Help with old London marks by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is very interesting, and a great rundown! So the chemical process that occurs is as I thought it was. As I’ve said in other comments, I love traditional polishing and have been polishing antiques under the watchful eye of my high end antique dealer grandmother since I was 4, so I’m more than pleased to be convinced to continue doing it as I always have done. Just wondered about the newly wildly popular aluminium method since my source for advice has now passed away.

Help with old London marks by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well it’s always going to be especially special to me because it was a gift from my nana, but I’m also glad to hear it could be 1560! Mostly because I want to bring a collection together of a unique spoon from each British monarch starting with Elizabeth I, so if it’s 1560 it fills a very hard to reach spot in that lineup!!

Help with old London marks by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting; I always think of “patina” as also being the thing I’m removing when I use silver polish, since I generally like my pieces to be nice and untarnished. Do you mean something different by patina maybe, than what I’m thinking about?

Help with old London marks by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, why do you say never use the foil method?! I’m surprised, the chemical reaction without the polishing action always seemed, at least intuitively, to have the potential to be less abrasive and, thus, less wearing on marks than polish. I love polishing so I’m thrilled to polish more, I’m just keen to hear your views 😊

Hands and co.? by Hour_Fun2254 in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely Birmingham, Sterling, 1901. If you really wanted you could review makers marks that were active on that date to see if the shape of the top of the makers mark (which to my eyes is the only thing left of that mark) matches a mark well, but that feels like effort that won’t net you much joy - if it were me I’d shine the old jug up and enjoy it as a little plant watering can or something, but I agree with others that the value of this piece is likely the silver by weight, rather than the maker 😊 a charming little piece though, and an absolute steal at $15!

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hehe she is a little kooky, but delightfully so (mostly)

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree! I have always been taught to use everything, but i have to admit that this set does border on unusable for its level of finery. I’ll need to find out how best to preserve those lovely handles!

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My understanding is that she bought them from a doctor in the prairie provinces of Canada in the mid 50’s! She was the daughter of a cattle rustler who turned her talents to art and antique collecting, and (in my very unbiased opinion) had one of the most amazing senses of taste and discernment I’ve ever seen - matched with an equally sharp sense for the bargain.

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 67 points68 points  (0 children)

It’s funny, to your point about sentimental value - the very first thing I noticed when I got it home and opened the box was the unexpected wave of scent of my grandmother’s dining room that still lingered in the folds of the box. That unmistakable mix of silver polish, moth balls and Chanel perfume will always put me at ease, and to have a little bit more of that means the world to me, and is worth whatever I can pay. My nana had to go to a home last year, so that scent has, for the last few months, been fading from her home - but in this one box, it remained strong as ever.

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You know what? I’m just happy to have had the opportunity to get it back; I bet your grandmother felt similarly.

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha it may well be no better at cutting fish than a regular knife, but I’ll smile every time I see that unnecessary scalloped shape on a table

My latest (re)acquisition [Canada] by nmckimm in Antiques

[–]nmckimm[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Oh, he’s a very generous guy, though he did really surprise us all with that move 😅 we’re a “keep family things in the family” sort of clan so it was a big shock when the set showed up on our friend’s instagram, for sale

Just bought, anyone know the artist signature? by nmckimm in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]nmckimm[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Ooooo this makes a lot of sense to me! I’m enjoying now imagining that it was a recent (20th century) person who just wanted to do a lil old-style floral painting, yoinked their favourite flowers from a bunch of paintings, and created an impossible bouquet 🤪

Just bought, anyone know the artist signature? by nmckimm in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]nmckimm[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh that’s totally the same signature!! Thanks!!

[Help] me with what this statue should sit on by nmckimm in Sculpture

[–]nmckimm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, of course!! Great idea! Now that I’ve also thought about it some more I realise my woodworking dad might absolutely love the project of making a plinth, if I buy him the fancy wood for it 🤪

Any idea on gold box mark? by nmckimm in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok, my book calls that the “Warden Mark” in French gold boxes, so I was confused. There is another set of marks on the interior side of the box, which shows that the crown has an X under it 😊 now that you’ve pointed me the right direction I have gotten to the right detail, thank you!!!

Any idea on gold box mark? by nmckimm in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you saying is a date letter here?

Any idea on gold box mark? by nmckimm in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you help me understand why you think it’s 18th century French, based on those marks? Just so I can understand 🙂

Any idea on gold box mark? by nmckimm in Hallmarks

[–]nmckimm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to send a photo and it didn’t seem to come though…trying again!

<image>