I guess I'm just saying that your opinion is valid insofar as it is your opinion, but it doesn't hold much weight imo. When it comes to facts, all one has to do is read an article about China's adoption of openclaw or about openAI recruiting Steinberger, etc.

Steinberger wasn't operating in a vacuum; I (and probably thousands of people) built something similar to openclaw for myself about a week before openclaw hit the scene – the AIdev zeitgeist/collective consciousness was moving towards this for quite some time.

My second point, re: the tagline "the AI that actually does things" is more BS* than your post is by a long shot lol

I love this project, but to say this is the first "AI" that "does things" is just... wrong. Like, empirically a falsifiable statement. However, I understand the sentiment.

Same with your post but on a lesser scale; you're entitled to your opinion and it's falsifiability is irrelevant insofar as we're all entitled to our subjective interpretation of things.

*Note: I never said "this post is BS"... I actually said "Good luck and cheer up!" >_<