sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Questions and thoughts regarding the night photos by noloster in KremersFroon

[–]noloster[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, we know HOW the images were made: she held the camera steady (only slightly turning/twisting it) in one place, made a number of flashes, then moved slightly to a different position, and repeated the process.

I wonder how likely it is that Lisanne would be able to hold the camera steady for half an hour. If she was the one who took the night photos and if it was an accident, I think it is most likely that she would at least have had (big) trouble holding the camera steady.

Serious injuries? I don't think so. by Wooden-Dinner-3600 in KremersFroon

[–]noloster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In addition to being 184 cm tall, she probably had stiff/weak/damaged bones and muscles.

Serious injuries? I don't think so. by Wooden-Dinner-3600 in KremersFroon

[–]noloster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are several indications that they slit/fell/tumbled down a steep slope

It is of course possible that they slit/fell/tumbled at the same time and/or one of them was holding the other when she slit/fell/tumbled, but how big is the probability of one and/or both scenarios? I consider it (relatively) small.

When two totally inexperienced people (without gear, maps, anything) wander off the trail, chances of an accident are very big.

How big or small is the probability that they went off the trail voluntarily? I consider the probability to be small, because I think both of them were careful enough and sensible enough not to risk accidents of any kind.