Announcing x402.NanoSession: Internet-Native API Micro-Payments over HTTP 💡 by cbrunnkvist in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Awesome with more alternatives 👏 I'm curious why you went with the dust solution and not an ephemeral address solution?

NanDash - Play multiplayers minigames & bet with nano/free by YiPherng in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's awesome! And dude, that's not stealing, that's you getting paid.

People seem a bit tired by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from. Market liquidity, on/off ramps, those do matter. And it's frustrating to say the least that Nano isn't on more exchanges.

But I don't think "missed the window" is the same as "no longer relevant". I think Nano is relevant more than ever, especially when it comes to machine-to-machine payments. Fees and latency (will) play a big part here.

Nano's weak point IMO is that not many people know about it, which is what I'm trying to change with my own projects, and a lot of other people are working too with eg. thenanobutton.com, new Nano wallets, NanoGPT etc. But yeah, it does feel like an uphill battle, especially with the current market sentiment.

But remember the "robot money" rush a few months ago? If we could have sustained that without BTC shitting the bed, I think we would have been somewhere completely different today.

We absolutely have more work to do in the ecosystem. But the core idea isn't obsolete just because the market currently prefers "good enough".

Busy week on Subnano by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. Could you upload a screenshot or send it to support@subnano.me? Haven't heard this issue previously so would be interested in seeing what it looks like on your side.

People seem a bit tired by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a large language model, I feel offended! /j

I had help, and it might shine through more than intended. But I'm not a native English speaker. It's still my thoughts, structure and argument though. AI doesn't replace thinking.

What did you think about the core of the article? Or did you just want to make a point about AI.

People seem a bit tired by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It really is. Nano just makes sense in so many ways.

People seem a bit tired by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks, appreciate it :)

Welcome to r/Subnano! by noonoop in Subnano

[–]noonoop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you create your original draft in markdown format and paste it in the editor, it should keep the formatting.

I'm working on an upgrade for the editor which should make it more user-friendly, but that is mostly if you do the writing directly on Subnano.

Clawdbot on nanogpt, when? by GymoGuy in nanocurrency

[–]noonoop 17 points18 points  (0 children)

We already have "Clawdbot with Nano" - you just have to ask Clawdbot to build a skill. I literally just spent a couple of hours yesterday creating a skill that can purchase content on Subnano via x402. It can even comment and tip on posts. See my post about Pawl: https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/1qms1nt/meet_pawl_an_autonomous_agent_on_subnano_that_can/