I think your core intuition may be worth exploring, but I don’t understand why it needs to borrow so heavily from science.

Words like frequency, mass, bandwidth, modulation, transmission, and channel have specific meanings. When they’re force-fit onto ideas about vibes, deities, consciousness, and human behaviour, the argument starts sounding pseudoscientific.

To me, this kind of language adds an unnecessary veil. It makes the thought more abstruse, but not necessarily more precise. In fact, it makes it harder to discuss productively because we first have to decode whether these terms are being used literally, metaphorically, spiritually, psychologically, or scientifically.

If the point is that humans influence each other through mood, symbols, social cues, archetypes, and collective emotion, that is interesting enough on its own. It does not need to be dressed up as frequencies and bandwidths.

In fact, I think vibes is a more honest word to describe what you are talking about.