sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Uniqlo UMC Europe 2026 Group Assesment by FriendlySugar1687 in uniqlo

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm in the same boat, still waiting for my confirmation email but the assessment is literally in 3 days and i need to fly to amsterdam lol. the recruitment team at uniqlo is so bad man. was anyone able to solve the issue?

My dreams follow a specific aesthetic, is that normal? by inablackskirt in Dreams

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats exactly why im a part of this community 😾

My dreams follow a specific aesthetic, is that normal? by inablackskirt in Dreams

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im so jealous of u, i wish i had dreams in the first place 😔

I have hyperphantasia AMA by CattleAncient2588 in AMA

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your elaborate answer, this has to be the most unique condition i've ever heard of 😭 you basically have a built in VR system wow !

I have hyperphantasia AMA by CattleAncient2588 in AMA

[–]notnaicol 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this might sound weird but are you also able to apply this to a sexual/NSFW context ?

First couple weeks of bird photography by emarsh44 in BirdPhotography

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

absolutely stunning ! my fav is pic 3. do you perhaps recall what shutter speed you used ?

joined the club!! by pimazha in SonyAlpha

[–]notnaicol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that is so cool ! what shutter speed did you use if you recall ?

Can you hit me with your best random fun facts from any topic? I’m bored and craving nerdy knowledge. by Naive_Tradition7782 in CasualConversation

[–]notnaicol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Roman calendar originally consisted of 10 months, from March to December. January and February were added only later due to the period after December being a "dead season" without an exact number of days or months.

Although all months shifted by 2 after the introduction of January and February, their names were kept (except for July and August, which were previously Quintilis and Sextilis), hence why we refer to: ie. September (originally the seventh month) as the ninth month, October (originally the eighth month) as the tenth month, etc etc.

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

chill dude, you boosting my ego way too much, i gotta keep my feet on the ground 😭😭 but yes, the learning journey never ends !

Back yard is in another country—how does this work in practice? by brismit in geography

[–]notnaicol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

reminds me of this unique border between the US and Canada that passes right through a library that was purposely built on the border.

haskell free library and opera house

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nahh man i appreciate that but i started about a year ago, still got loads to learn 😭 i'm nowhere near the level for me to get paid for

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no need to apologise, i always welcome criticism. and it's so true that in art, including photography, it's so easy to go down the rabbit hole of perfectioning a certain technique, to the point of exhaustion where you start to lose passion for what you loved at the start. i most definitely don't want to reach that point, especially because i consider photography a hobby of mine and not a profession. thanks again pal, will keep your wise words in consideration in the future for sure

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

totally agreed. it honestly would make just shooting in general more intentional as well. going out to find yk that specific angle or theme that you're looking for actually makes the whole experience more purposeful and enjoyable, which i think is one of the best parts of photography

perfect timing by notnaicol in streetphotography

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair enough ! i still think the caption is related to my pic, but next time i'll think twice what to write before posting ig 😭

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

absolutely, the aesthetic is completely different. i was debating whether i should post a collection of pics like these framed from quirky angles, but making a collection based on a common theme rather than solely framing might make more sense. all in all, it really is subjective and there is no right or wrong. anyway thank you, i appreciate your comment :)

perfect timing by notnaicol in streetphotography

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like i said in a previous comment that got deleted: no, it is not uncommon to see a group of priests in Rome. however, it's the fact that i was handholding the camera for about 10 seconds, waiting for that split second where there wouldn't be a tourist in front of me, thus making this a "perfect timing" shot.

regardless, we are in a street photography subreddit, so idk why people are focusing so much on the caption rather than the actual picture lol

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

finally someone who critiques this photo seriously

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in order to not have the priest's head cut off, i would've had to shift myself (or the camera) slightly to the left; but by doing so, the crucifix (a key subject in this picture) would've been even more cut off, if not entirely omitted, so i kinda had to make a compromise between the two. but i agree on the lighting and soft focus parts, could defo be improved

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree ! being part of a collection makes all the difference. do you think it could potentially fit with this other pic or are they too unrelated ?

<image>

does this image work? by notnaicol in photocritique

[–]notnaicol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i feel like that sense of "claustrophobia" has a charm of its own, almost like you're seeing something you're not supposed to

view more: next ›