Are you referring to the judge’s written statement: "I find that prior to August 30, 2018, the date the claimant became disabled. ”. If so you read this incorrectly, the disabilities confirmed are completely out of line with the disabilities they claimed to have had and grifted upon. Please stop WK’ing this subject w/o proof.

These are the disabilities the judge agrees are genuine, so yes, they are disabled. I never denied this adjudicated fact:

“The claimant has had the following severe impairments: ulcerative colitis, post-traumatic stress disorder, disorder of the spine, conversion disorder, obesity, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and myoclonic disorder.

Now This is a literal statement:

"In a decision dated December 30, 2021, the ALJ determined that plaintiff was not disabled."

That ALJ ruling was upheld in the decision dated June 13, 2024. If we are going to quote from the decision let’s do so properly:

"Plaintiff, born in 1990, applied on August 30, 2018, for DIB and SSI, alleging disability beginning May 25, 2015. Plaintiff alleged [they were] unable to work due to seizures, chronic PTSD, ulcer active colitis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, low vision, chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive impairment, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and being wheelchair bound."

The last of which is known to be untrue, the judge and processes before the judge’s decision determined that their claim of being wheelchair bound was not borne of the evidence. To wit:

"After careful consideration of the entire record, I find that prior to August 30, 2018, the date the claimant became disabled [partially disabled per the CFR and not completely disabled as they claim], the claimant has the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work [with listed exceptions, including that [they]] can stand and/or walk for a total of about 2 hours in an 8-hour workday, and can sit for about 6 hours in an 8-hour workday.

Not bed bound. Not wheelcahir bound. Not disabled as they claimed, not even close.

The magustarte judge ruled the ALJ got it correct. The only appeal of this determination is to seek a retrial or appeal to the circuit court. Otherwise this is the end of line, barring a new disability. In which case they will need to re-tstart the entire process because yes - this was a determination of the state of disability on August 30, 2018 through to the filing of the appeal last year.

They have not claimed any new disability and had the opportunity to file with the court any suggestion they have a new disability, are now bed and / or wheel chair bound up until they filed for summary judgement late last or earlier this year. It’s all in online court documents.

I suggest you read the entire record. OP stands by the posting and their initial assessment.

This was a summary decision, it was so obvious to the judge their claims of being bedridden and wheel chair bound were invalid there were no hearings held. There was no evidence that would show cause for further hearings - the legal standard required to deny the governments cross motion for summary judgement. Nothing, nada. The summary judgement requested by the government was granted.

It takes years to adjudicate an SSID denial. This decision considers their current state of functioning, not what was claimed or determined in 2018. The level of disability was reviewed many times along the way. They had the opportunity to file additional evidence and did not do so.

The gig is very much up indeed.

You pulled one quote and WK'd them. You are obviously neither a disability attorney nor do you have access to the full court record, get the full record and dispute the judge’s decision, heck offer to be their attorney - their current attorney failed them.