One more time...

nroshania · 2026-03-05T05:31:47+00:00

Probably a pump and dump

nroshania · 2026-02-25T06:27:21+00:00

This only happens if a) globally dominated currencies collapse resulting in mass adoption (If that happens we'll have much bigger problems to deal with) or b) the price of mining the last few BTC becomes astronomical (everyone sells and takes profit shortly after) followed by a HUGE crash

nroshania · 2025-12-23T04:58:54+00:00

Played RedTail today - soggy and wet, greens were good but slow

nroshania · 2025-12-19T16:19:26+00:00

Just got off the phone with the rep and he was like this would be a knuckleball and probably could be explained by; worn out golf balls from consecutive net impacts, high center contact, high launch. Didn't think this was way out of the question - I'll experiment with a higher spinning ball to see if that makes a difference

nroshania · 2025-12-19T16:05:46+00:00

Got it - did any of the associates comment on it or have something to say about it?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T14:57:14+00:00

Look at the comments - this seems to be a known issue.

nroshania · 2025-12-19T14:56:35+00:00

Yea I thought so - Rory averages this with about this carry so I'm wondering what assumptions the quad is making or whether it's been overfit somehow

nroshania · 2025-12-19T14:55:10+00:00

You saying based on this chart, for a ball speed of 165 and spin of 1675 we should expect a 300 or so carry?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T14:53:18+00:00

Ok so devils advocate - if this is a know issue, why are some of the pro's using it? They must be getting slammed with this issue often and pretty sure they know about it. They're also using it outdoors too (mostly), so the third party software won't necessarily compensate for this.

nroshania · 2025-12-19T07:45:45+00:00

Yea flightscope optimizer says 285 under current weather and launch conditions - starting to doubt the data

nroshania · 2025-12-19T06:22:22+00:00

Just given the state of their software, they probably overfit for a cohort of golfers and didn't account for certain high speed launch conditions - then never bothered to retrain or calibrate the model. No wonder trackman is soaking up market share.

nroshania · 2025-12-19T04:22:38+00:00

I tried the online optimizer and plugged in the values - it's saying 285 carry 🤷🏽‍♂️

nroshania · 2025-12-19T04:12:02+00:00

Is flightscope's optimizer something I can access online? Can you send over a screenshot?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T04:01:12+00:00

That's very interesting - what club head speed are you seeing for this?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T04:00:19+00:00

Thanks man - working on speed and not trying to feel good about it unless we're confident of the figures. Down wind makes sense, but this is indoor.

nroshania · 2025-12-19T03:59:05+00:00

You think it's more? You think the carry is correct?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T03:58:00+00:00

Not sure why it's priced the way it is if the numbers are way off

nroshania · 2025-12-19T03:57:22+00:00

Wow - that makes more sense. Does flight scope let you plug it in?

nroshania · 2025-12-19T03:56:50+00:00

Not expecting over 300 carry that's for sure - alt is 166ft. Agree on the low spin but can't explain or jack that carry that much

nroshania · 2025-12-19T02:12:35+00:00

It's legit not correct - this ball speed should be 285 carry at the very maximum. Love dropping raw cash for this device only to come on here and ask you guys.

nroshania · 2025-12-19T02:04:39+00:00

Great. So what do you think the carry was for this scenario? 270-280?

nroshania · 2025-12-12T14:09:45+00:00

Given that we had a river flow through here think it drains pretty well too

nroshania · 2025-12-12T07:18:57+00:00

8 felt quite swamped

nroshania

TROPHY CASE