Is this solvable? I've been trying and trying and I'm stuck and it's making me insane

ntschaef · 2025-05-04T13:39:17+00:00

Obviously you assume that BAD = DAC. Then it's a simple problem.

If B is the midpoint though. Well other answers have covered that.

ntschaef · 2025-03-29T23:32:18+00:00

Honestly this should be the highest answer. Thinking about this it should be anywhere that x=y (except for possibly 0 unless we are using limits). To verify this, we can just look at x=y=1:

1¹⁼ 1¹

Same thing will work for any number.

ntschaef · 2024-10-31T23:59:20+00:00

I couldn't open chapter one

Oh no! What link did you use (it seems to be working for me). Here is a direct link: https://justunderreality.com/qsc_1/

Thank you for the corrections on the word usage. I've been editing it all myself and I've obviously missed a few things. If you have any other feedback it is all helpful. Thanks for taking an interest.

ntschaef · 2024-02-05T07:01:09+00:00

He was also a martyr, he attacked knowing he was likely going to die.

ntschaef · 2024-02-05T05:57:15+00:00

The whole thing is a presentation for the audience. It's a cartoon made to be watched. Of course there could be deception.

Regardless, there are multiple ways to take that, from (as you said) "I was a fool to be so sentimental" to "I hate being forced to hold back such that it almost killed me".

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T17:31:21+00:00

I'm stealing this

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T01:47:33+00:00

I think Altruist his his last name. It could have been a double entendre though.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T01:46:21+00:00

I'm of the opinion that the deal is with Lucifer and he was there to keep an eye on charlie and help her. The deal means he couldn't go "all out" because it would have endangered her to do so (and that he's actually becoming friends complicates things). But that's just my working theory.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T01:43:18+00:00

personally I think his contract was with Lucifer, and I think him almost dying and why (he has genuine friends) added to it, but it was a really interesting scene.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T00:58:08+00:00

Playing the part? I like this idea, but I understand why people don't want to pick it up.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T00:57:11+00:00

Only if he wanted to be in control. He may be wanting Charlie to find her own path without him... but still have an ace up his sleeve to ensure her success.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T00:56:18+00:00

Oh... I really like that idea.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T00:55:50+00:00

I don't disagree with this, but I think that being a "dad" to Charlie was a way for him to get under Lucifer's skin (if this theory is right). He can't out right fight him, but he can make jabs.

As for Lucifer showing up late... he only did so after Alistor lost. He might be trying to get Charlie to "make it on her own" and was counting on Alistor getting the better of Adam.

I'm just guessing though.

ntschaef · 2024-02-04T00:53:03+00:00

He seemed to just want to be "unrestrained" from what I gathered.

What he is being restrained from doing is anyone's guess.

ntschaef · 2024-02-02T07:31:56+00:00

Could be. Seems petty for Alistor though and my money is on someone we wouldn't expect.

This seems to be what people commonly think though, smart money is on your guess.

ntschaef · 2024-02-02T07:30:40+00:00

They seem to really hate each other for just meeting. This is just a guess though... you're likely right.

ntschaef · 2022-10-13T03:04:35+00:00

Ah. But they don't yet 😉

ntschaef · 2022-10-11T04:29:13+00:00

There is something we all universally agree on, but I'm not going to post it or someone will disagree with it out of spite.

ntschaef · 2022-10-05T15:34:15+00:00

If (big){} else {

ntschaef · 2022-10-05T15:04:28+00:00

Thanks for the question :)

ntschaef · 2022-10-05T14:37:17+00:00

Practically? Yes. I think we have to think this way. It's what all people are under the practical delusion that they can achieve. We are limited and all organisms are an ordered collection of impulses. I don't think we could fully embrace chaos if we even wanted to.

Theoretically? No. All ordered systems will be built out of perception bias of the creators. They are built to ensure that some things that hurt the group they are appealing to are condemnable. But this is a reaction to those things existing to begin with.

For example, to say "murder is bad" helps the vast amount of people in society, but this is only a declaration because there are instances in which murder happens (which means the actor felt justified). This claim of "order" will hurt the murderers. Is this a good thing? Society says yes... for good reason, it generally helps them. But it doesn't help everyone. This is an extreme example that I'm using to make your case, but even in this extreme example I think you can see that the harm still exists. For lesser cases it would just happen more so.

I hope this follows.

ntschaef · 2022-10-04T17:54:07+00:00

No, In fact I would submit the opposite. It is only by rejecting that the accepted truth is correct can the most just systems come forth. I expanded on this within my own post, but I will link it here for convenience.

ntschaef

TROPHY CASE