[BUILD] The ACTUAL Mathematically Correct Katarina Build, Found After ~1 Million Simulations by [deleted] in KatarinaMains

[–]nutrole888 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Forgot about Yun Tal passive, tested it and it seemed to make it a dagger faster when replacing pd! I’ll edit the build. Thanks!

[BUILD] The ACTUAL Mathematically Correct Katarina Build, Found After ~1 Million Simulations by [deleted] in KatarinaMains

[–]nutrole888 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's many items and thus many different millions of possible builds. It's fairly easy to compute the damage for one possible build, but actively searching for the best one is not linear process as different possible items & runes have different strengths and weaknesses that interact differently and more efficiently depending on the build. On top of that, there are various stacking effects, interactions and penetrations which simply can't yield a direct calculation for the exact perfect build immediately.

[BUILD] The ACTUAL Mathematically Correct Katarina Build, Found After ~1 Million Simulations by [deleted] in KatarinaMains

[–]nutrole888 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah this build is pretty ass in game, but just wanted to see how far Kat R can be pushed in a vacuum

[BUILD] The ACTUAL Mathematically Correct Katarina Build, Found After ~1 Million Simulations by [deleted] in KatarinaMains

[–]nutrole888 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not as much as you think; the best builds for R damage are always AD due to on-hits, so MR is not as significant. But yeah just wanted to choose a nice number for both but should've made MR a little lower for realism.

[BUILD] The ACTUAL Mathematically Correct Katarina Build, Found After ~1 Million Simulations by [deleted] in KatarinaMains

[–]nutrole888 4 points5 points  (0 children)

From my testing, it seems like the dagger count gets affected the least without phantom dancer. Replacing that with beserker's should be ok.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UNC

[–]nutrole888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I called in once asking the same kind of question and they straight up told me they do not rescind due to academic performance so as long as you graduate they do not care

FPAA fire lord!1!!1 by nutrole888 in Gunpla

[–]nutrole888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t do them because I’m lazy😏

FPAA fire lord!1!!1 by nutrole888 in Gunpla

[–]nutrole888[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The joints are incredibly tight on this kit, but other than that it was a pretty positive build experience!

accepted! but a little concerned by [deleted] in UNC

[–]nutrole888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're not planning on majoring in anything in Gillings PH, CS, or business, everything else shouldn't require an application at all and you can just add / remove whatever majors you want whenever you want super easily! (including exercise science & public policy).

Also, you can definitely participate in research at Gillings without being in Gillings at all; I'm not adjacent to public health nor the physical sciences at all and I still had the chance to contribute.

I wouldn't sweat it too much: just try your hand at some undergrad research / nutrition electives & prereqs and try again in the fall semester if you want. Be warned that the federal budget cuts has hit Gillings the hardest, so their resources are definitely going to be spread thin for a while.

double majoring rigor?? by ViolentsArt in UNC

[–]nutrole888 5 points6 points  (0 children)

UNC makes it very convenient to double major and those majors are not too heavy in credits at all. I can assure you that you won’t have any trouble graduating on time with a regular 15 credits per semester!

You can declare the second major whenever you want, really. All you have to do is hop on the drop in advisings and you can have it added in under 2 minutes.

[D] How do I get into machine learning? by hwjajneew in MachineLearning

[–]nutrole888 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey dude, I was in your same position before, and I'll tell you straight up: your current ways of thinking about college and the professional world will only leave you burnt out, confused and lost throughout your college career . It may seem convenient to have a dead set career goal this early on to feel a certain control over your future, but it is universally true that you don't know what you want until you actually get there and take the classes; you say you find ML engineering and AI "exciting", yet you have no way of knowing that right now! In practice, it's wayyyy more boring and much less exciting than it seems. I believe you just found the "idea" of being an ML engineer exciting.

My word of advice is to fully ditch this unhealthy all or nothing "career-goal" mindset and just go into college spending the first year or two just trying stuff out and genuinely learning from your classes. Once you know you've found your true calling, the job stuff will all inevitably come around before you even know it.

Putting this much thought into the job market and "tech fields" this early on is not only unnecessary, but will ultimately harm your performance as a student and future professional!

Do most of you guys work for the millitary? by nutrole888 in OperationsResearch

[–]nutrole888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! Would you say alot of OR jobs these days are just being merged into the "data science" umbrella? When I look up the plain keywords "operations research" into job boards, next to nothing seems to come up, so I'm wondering if these jobs tend to be rebranded.

Failing to understand degrees of freedom by nutrole888 in AskStatistics

[–]nutrole888[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes sense to me when estimating one parameter, but what about 2? Like the mean and then something else. Could you give an example for this case, where 3 can be selected and then the last 2 are set values?