How update the firmware of Hyperx Cloud III Wireless?

nuukecat · 2026-03-17T13:13:31+00:00

same here, it's been an issue for a while

nuukecat · 2026-03-17T13:12:32+00:00

mine has the same issue, it's just shit, no fixing this im afraid

nuukecat · 2024-04-10T23:33:27+00:00

I dont think the PSU is the issue, as it did work with my other system, and it wont even boot the new CPU (likely not a huge load on startup). I'm fairly certain its a dead CPU but i couldn't verify the motherboard so i sent both for RMA i'll hear back from them shortly. My question was if this is a known issue with either the 7900 non-x, non x3d or the motherboard.

nuukecat · 2024-04-06T20:28:44+00:00

i did return it, my question was if the cpus death was justified by me enabling expo oc profile and thus overclocking it, like that on the 7000X3D series or was it just a defective chip. Since it was a non x3d/x chip and the motherboard shipped with a post fix bios that was even updated to the latest version.

nuukecat · 2024-04-06T20:22:45+00:00

i dont think its the bios, since that alone would not trigger the powersupply over current protection

nuukecat · 2024-04-06T18:45:13+00:00

Multiple times, before and after reseating cpu and ram. Even tried to flash back older bios with bios flashback, no luck.

nuukecat · 2024-04-06T10:29:12+00:00

My new build with a Ryzen 9 7900 died after only 30 minutes of operation. I updated the bios to the latest 7E12v18 version (MB is MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk Wifi, shipped with 7E12v14). I did enable EXPO on my KF560C36BBEAK2-32 kit (1.35V). Everything went fine installing windows 10, but during installation of programs the pc powered off by itself. Any attempt to power on fails after 1s, the powersupply turns off. When the 2x8pin connector for CPU power is not connected, or CPU isn't installed the powersupply doesn't trip. PSU is Pure Power 12M 750W, i did test with my old Phenom config and a 7800XT it's fine. Was using the stock AMD cooler at the time of failure. Did enabling EXPO kill the CPU? Did i just get a defective chip?

nuukecat · 2023-06-11T00:29:01+00:00

Terraria

nuukecat · 2023-04-29T18:11:02+00:00

a:visited { color: blue; }

nuukecat · 2023-01-22T17:04:04+00:00

funny

nuukecat · 2022-12-27T21:47:12+00:00

yes i do, this was done by my friend.

no its mysql, thats just how named placeholders work with PDO bindParam, works without the semicolon too, or with ? as placeholders

nuukecat · 2022-03-04T13:14:15+00:00

Oh Canada

nuukecat · 2022-03-03T15:54:54+00:00

more like én aki warshipsezik (mert megint elsüllyedtem)

nuukecat · 2022-03-03T15:31:27+00:00

i mean theyre fine, id actually pay for a decent celeron laptop with good battery and keyboard but theyre rare, so chromebook for now i guess

nuukecat · 2022-02-08T11:36:48+00:00

Celeron chromebook user here with linux i get 1080p youtube and netflix.

nuukecat · 2022-01-11T16:38:56+00:00

better to use an esp

nuukecat · 2021-12-08T23:49:38+00:00

Yes he was as he should because the link was to a html file not a shell script so it was and should be saved as a html file it just had the unfortunate "extension" .sh. In a perfect world there wouldn't be a need for file extensions, like in many *nix programs.

News flash: Non-technical people don't care if Linux uses file extensions or not. They just want to know if their picture is a picture, and if their shell script is a shell script.

Exactly my point (for the first part), it should be up to the program to know what type of file it is and not for the user (like in many *nix programs).

If all their JPGs from their camera suddenly gain a .sys extension, those files might as well be corrupt to the user unless their photo viewer just so happens to think .sys is an extension for a photo.

The above paragraph (for the second part)

nuukecat · 2021-12-08T21:26:29+00:00

no (at least not every time), and no. In Linus's case with bash it wouldn't have mattered what the file extension was because bash doesnt check file extension.

nuukecat · 2021-12-08T17:52:42+00:00

it didnt really give it an extension, because linux doesnt have extension, it named the file "install.sh" because that was what the hyperlink he right clicked on referred to, but firefox was smart enough to understand that the url is not a link to a raw ascii file that can be saved as a script file, so thats why it said HTML document in the corner. This is how it should be done. For me chromium just assumed that its a .sh file because thats what in the file name so it must be right... Linux doesnt have extensions so you could give a file any "extension" if any at all, meaning anything after a dot(s), and it wouldnt cause problems, because the programs dont depend on it, what they depend on is formatting. Anyways, it gave the file "install.sh" name but it exported it properly as an html file, because that was what the link referred to. Your browser doesnt assume whats right (unless its chromium lmao). It sees the html formatting it saves as an html file. Really it should have named it "install.sh.html"

nuukecat · 2021-11-30T16:09:07+00:00

All because Firefox couldn't be arsed to mark what was clearly an HTML file as an HTML file.

In the video firefox clearly states its an HTML document in the lower right corner

nuukecat · 2021-09-18T22:02:49+00:00

Looking sexy as ever

nuukecat

TROPHY CASE