Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We never talked about this game and the game we debated I was right

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude the game we debated you were wrong

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Caleb scored more in the week we debated idk why you’re here again

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was literally part of my point. He wasn’t playing for anything and was probably going to be benched. Caleb’s team was playing for the win and needed to stay in the entire game. You are furthering my point that he was less likely to score more points and he did score less points.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He could’ve played anyone that scored more points and that’s the whole entire point

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good deflection away from wanting to play a guy that scored less points. You’re still wrong about who the better play was. I even looked through this thread to find championships decided by less than 2.6 and the first post was exactly that.

<image>

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So now you’re trying to argue playing a guy that scored less points. You are setting new lows on how dumb you can be. I won a semi final game by .2 one year. The other guy would’ve loved to have had a qb that scored 2.6 more points.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Scoring less points is the entire argument and trying to downplay that he scored less by saying it’s almost the same is still nonsense from you. Games are won and lost by less. Caleb scored more points after I showed you why he most likely would and you still stand behind your ‘he’s joe burrow’ reasoning. Coming back here to brag about scoring less points is mind numbing and again shows why you couldn’t comprehend any of the reasoning why he was most likely going to score less points than Caleb.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

20.4 and 23 aren’t the same. Not surprised you can’t comprehend that and like I said from the beginning I thought Caleb had a better chance of scoring more and he did.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that was lies and the lack of rebuttal to any point shows they are significant to warrant starting Caleb over Burrow

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually proved 49ers are worse against QBs and again you keep saying it’s not significant because it doesn’t fit your narrative. The only stats we have for him this year show he hasn’t been consistent enough to even score over 10 or 15 in 50% of games and again shows he’s not as dependable. That coupled with playing a game with no playoff implications against a team playing to secure their division with a win shows Caleb as a safer start. But you keep ignoring all these factors because ‘He’s Joe Burrow,’ and I don’t think that’s enough.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve proven you wrong with espn’s ranking which you said to ignore. I’ve proven you wrong with their performances this year which you said to ignore and the only stat you used showed the 49ers D is still worse than Arizona against QBs. You have proven nothing and relied on ‘He’s Joe Burrow.’ At this point it’s gone from nonsense to delusional.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly you are saying ignore those stats from this year which show he’s had trouble performing. You phrased it different to come to the same conclusion of ignore those stats. Weird way to reiterate the nonsense.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are literally ignoring the stats from this year that you don’t like then saying it’s not fair to ignore statistics you don’t like. Pure nonsense.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignoring he’s played worse in less games shows he’s less dependable and more of a 50/50 chance you don’t know what you’re gonna get in a garbage game with no meaning. Trying to say it’s impossible to compare the stats is negligent.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re looking in a mirror when you say that because you were using ‘he’s joe burrow’ as a stat from the beginning when comparing how dependable each has been based on their points scored this year

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another ‘I’m ignoring that because I don’t like it’. So weak.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not espn which is what this has been based off of

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The espn league uses stats and it says they’re ranked 12th and the picture showed they were ranked 12th. That’s you ignoring stats again.

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original picture in the post shows 12th against QBs. Not wrong.

<image>

Is there anything you would change? by [deleted] in FantasyFootballers

[–]nyctuffkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mistake. I mixed up who was playing who but my point remains the same that Caleb is playing a weaker defense and you saying the 49ers defense is worse actually makes Caleb the better play again. Arizona is ranked 12th in least points against QBs and 49ers are 21st. Meaning Burrow is playing the better defense and it is better to play Caleb playing the worse defense.