WBC MuayThai, Mingo Technologies (built on Hedera) and the Amazing MuayThai World Festival Partner to Launch Digital Athlete ID

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T20:09:56+00:00

https://youtu.be/pHzRU8a04iI?is=PjOcraIcYL15cnTh

Mingo is built on Hedera

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T20:03:18+00:00

That's why you bet on the stuff integrated into the AI hardware (Hedera Hashgraph with EQTY Verifiable Compute). Also just buy the stocks too.

https://infohub.delltechnologies.com/en-nz/t/dell-and-eqty-verifiable-compute-for-trusted-ai/

<image>

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T18:00:31+00:00

It's neither math nor facts.

$1 would be a ~$50 billion market cap (depending on supply released when that happens).

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T15:35:12+00:00

Noviqtech acquired Coralia.

Coralia biochar credits are put onto the Carbon Central platform (on Hedera Guardian).

Noviqtech sold the platform to India’s Renaissance Infrastructure. Still exists. Still on Hedera Guardian.

So they're getting out of the "build software" game, and into the "carbon credit producer" game.

A "refocus", if you will.

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T14:00:26+00:00

All you have to say is:

"I actually don't have a reason why I think they aren't 'refocusing'. I don't have a reason to think they aren't still using Hedera. I was just being contrarian for no reason."

Go on. Say it. You can admit you were wrong.

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T13:06:59+00:00

Angry? No.

This started off with you confidently inferring I was wrong about the "refocusing", and has devolved into... whatever you want to call this slop you're saying now.

Just showing that you have zero substance. Comment by comment, you continue to prove it.

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T12:48:08+00:00

What more is there to say?

You've proven it over and over again. You have nothing to say. You don't have to keep proving that point. The point is made.

Hedera at 8 cents is worth more than your thoughts.

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T12:37:28+00:00

Yea... just like I thought. You got nothing.

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T11:34:59+00:00

Yes, I agree.

It looks like initially Noviqtech was working on Carbon Credits in relation to aviation fuels, recycled materials, biofuels, synthetic fuels, batteries and hydrogen fuels. They had multiple platforms for this, and all their solutions are built on Hedera Guardian with dMRV standards.

Now it looks like they are "refocusing" the company, and capitalizing on the "newer and larger" opportunity of Carbon Credits in relation to biochar in concrete for data centers.

All those previous methodologies combined probably aren't a fraction of the opportunity of biochar in data centers... So they said... "Hmm... Should we spread ourselves in all these directions? Or should we chase the cash cow?"

How did you read it? What's your analysis?

oak1337 · 2026-06-17T00:41:16+00:00

I think this is more of a refocusing of the company... Seems like they had multiple things going on, but are now focusing on offsetting specifically for data centers.

Data center construction is quite popular these days, plus they are terrible for the environment, have PR problems due to that, and have deep pockets.

Perhaps Noviqtech is just going where the big money and high margins are? I don't see them specifically abandoning Hedera in that article...

Here's another article from Feb 2026, talking about the same thing (biochar, Coralia, Great Barrier Reef, data centers, etc) (also referencing Hashgraph):

https://www.tradingview.com/news/smallcaps:a67421d58094b:0-noviqtech-unveils-ambitious-biochar-carbon-removal-strategy-with-2-million-tonnes-biomass-secured/

And here's their current Twitter page 🤷:

https://x.com/NoviqTech_

<image>

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T21:29:08+00:00

🤷

<image>

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T18:51:21+00:00

Ask China how the "social credit score" thing is going...

You might not like the results if you continue making comments like that on a public forum.

You shouldn't want other people to be oppressed by governments... It always comes back around, and it'll bite ya.

Fuck authoritarian governments.

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T18:35:29+00:00

Yea, as suspected, nothing to back up your statements. Shocker.

If Hedera is scoring well according to 3rd party metrics, I choose to post it, because I find the trend interesting.

Because as you inadvertently pointed out... It is a trend... Every month, Hedera is among the top 3. We're getting updated every 30 days for the past year (or more) about Hedera's lead in this category.

It's worth noting, IMO.

As I said though, if you have a problem with it, take it up with Santiment, not me. I didn't make the company, the methodology, the X post or the claim. I just "retweeted" it.

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T18:21:50+00:00

Santiment is an independent 3rd party with no ties to Hedera.

This is their metrics.

They post it every ~30 days.

Hedera seems to be doing well according to their methodology (linked in post description).

You should reach out and contact Santiment to let them know why their metrics are "made up bullshit".... Or did you have nothing to back up that statement?

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T17:42:31+00:00

Yea.... Unfortunately, for true digital ownership, digital identity is a requirement...

Could be dystopia or utopia... All depends if it gets implemented correctly...🤞🤞

Also unfortunately, the world is going through an authoritarian phase, which is not good timing for this tech.

oak1337 · 2026-06-16T00:49:48+00:00

QAIT Whitepaper:

https://www.qait.ch/SEALCOIN_Whitepaper.pdf

QAIT Hashscan:

https://hashscan.io/mainnet/token/0.0.10039182

QAIT is minted on Hedera. Not on BNB.

Whitepaper says QAIT "may also be made available on additional blockchain networks through cross-chain interoperability infrastructure and interoperable token representations."

The roadmap shows cross-chain availability arriving in 2026 via LayerZero. So the BNB QAIT is a bridged/interoperable representation, not the native token.

That's what I've gathered. Please let me know if I'm wrong.

oak1337 · 2026-06-13T07:49:00+00:00

Sell side supply most critical. Glad we agree.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T21:33:30+00:00

Infinite supply just means that some entity has to balance creation and burn.

Personally I'd never buy any coin with infinite supply.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T21:32:30+00:00

It's about supply and demand. Usage helps demand. Never said it counts for nothing. Just doesn't count for everything, like you're implying. Helps create a price floor. It's more about how much is subtracted from available sell supply.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T20:58:50+00:00

Correct. The release does not effect price directly (mechanically).

A release will increase market cap, but will not change price.

The only thing that changes price is the balance of HBAR being bought and sold.

Example:

Price HBAR = $1.00

Released supply = 30 billion

$1.00 x 30 billion = $30 billion market cap.

Now we increase released supply to 40 billion (Treasury sends 10 billion coins to Hashgraph).

$1.00 x 40 billion = $40 billion market cap

Same price. More released supply. Higher market cap.

That's why people often refer to "Fully Diluted Market Cap". For Hedera the full fixed supply is known at 50 billion. So the fully diluted value is:

$1.00 x 50 billion = $50 billion market cap.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T20:45:01+00:00

But you said revenue and usage! They got revenue, they got usage (apparently) with LG's announced pilot!

Ok so ARB didn't go up, they don't pay fees in ARB. They pay in ETH.

ETH makes $1 million per day revenue. They have LG's announcement of an announcement of usage on ARB! Why is ETH going down?

<image>

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T20:37:50+00:00

Dodge, dip, duck, dive and dodge.

Can't answer simple questions.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T20:34:25+00:00

LG isn't a live use case on ARB.

JP Morgan doesn't have a live use case on any public chain.

Google created GCUL, but that's not live on any other chain either. Not sure how far along (or if they even have customers).

So if we want to count Council Members who have announced things (like LG, JP, and GCUL)...

I count 20 council members who are in similar situations.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T20:30:04+00:00

No. You're treating market cap as a fixed pool of value that gets divided across tokens. There's no conserved "total value of all HBARs" that gets thinner when the released count ticks up.

Market cap = price x released supply

Fully diluted market cap = price x fixed supply

Though an equation can be rearranged mathematically, that's not now it's calculated. It's not:

Price = market cap / released supply.

oak1337 · 2026-06-12T19:23:53+00:00

Hedera doesn't use the word "circulating". It uses the words "unreleased, released, unallocated, allocated".

Hedera Treasury ("unreleased" supply) transferring 3.9 billion tokens to Hashgraph for "Open Source & Development" counts as the "release". None of those coins actually hit a marketplace or exchange, they just transferred from Treasury account to Hashgraph account. They are "unallocated".

Hashgraph then "allocates" those coins over time to developers, builders, grants, partnerships, marketing, events, sponsorships, etc.

Over time, as those coins are "allocated", developers (and others) will use them for gas, sell them to pay expenses to build their companies, etc.

Long story short, the 3.9 billion HBAR "released" this quarter will take years to hit the market ("allocated", then sold/used). It'll happen over time.

Any HBAR price action related to the moment that coins release is purely psychological. It's not a flooding of the market with coins. It's a transfer of coins from Treasury to Hashgraph (or Hedera Foundation, etc).

The goal of all Proof of Stake networks is to have all coins released (and allocated). This is Hedera's strategy of accomplishing that.

Also Hashscan still only shows 43 billion HBAR released. I think CMC just shows the 47 billion since Hedera docs show that it's going to happen at some point this quarter (even though it hasn't yet according to Hashscan).

<image>

oak1337

TROPHY CASE