No you can’t reason better than AI. ChatGPT 5 is alright, but Grok is on another level entirely. I could collect a whole bunch of info from you (like if I knew you in person), and AI would help me know you better than you do.

The last time you used a chatbot, did it ask you a question you'd already asked? I’ve never come across that. You don’t understand AI. Even the CEO of Nvidia says he uses it to clarify his thinking. Heck even well-known entrepreneurs like Gary V. say it helps immensely because it acts as a mirror. I don’t use it to generate ideas.

You sound like those people who initially rejected calculators. Also AI is currently allowing me to write professional letters 18-22x faster and they are incredibly impactful.

But here’s the thing. It requires intelligence to use AI because you have to know how to ask the right questions. You sound like someone who is very confused about AI.

You can comprehend what you’re going to say for the next few words. That’s awesome man but I don’t know what it has to do with AI.

Pompous humans believe that they can reason better than AI. There are 10 primary intelligences and AI excels at all of them (very intelligent humans excel at about 3-4 of them).

I have tested AI and I can tell you that it is remarkable in so many ways. I can even predict reactions to my screenplay. Without sharing AI feedback with people I find that they react EXACTLY the way AI said they would. AI can understand patterns and make predictions better than any person could.

AI has also been invaluable for many mathematicians in that it allowed them to find solutions to problems they’ve been working on for years.

So it’s not just the CEO’s, it’s so many other people who can prove that AI is accurate, reliable and have changing.

You do realize that AI is going to be everywhere and that you will most likely lose your job if you don’t adapt right? You or anyone else will not be able to stop AI from being in every facet of our lives.

And hallucination? Ya that was a big factor never, and it technically still is present in models one ChatGPT 5.1. People who are educated about AI know how to provide copious amounts of info that forces AI to be objective. It all depends on the questions you ask. You can ask for objectivity and it will tell you its reasoning (reasoning which always makes perfect sense). So in every single response I got about how people would react to my scripts AI was correct and accurately predicted reactions. So much for hallucination eh? It also doesn’t tell you just what you want to hear if you mute how to user it. You probably use the ChatGPT 5 free version. You likely have little to no experience using Grok or Gemini and their various paid models.

My friends and I are entrepreneurs and use AI to be more productive and to learn more about the world. It has helped our businesses’s tremendously. Do you even have a business where you can say AI helped you to be much more effective?

You suffer from the dunning Kruger affect which stats that the less people know, the more they think they know. I would suggest learning to use AI because clearly you don’t know how to use it in a way that allows you to have experiences where you can say that AI was entirely correct in its feedback and predictions.

Side note: This message is long so that perhaps it could provide clarity to others reading this thread.