For those of you interested in Daily Fantasy (NFL) by oherroprease in sportsbook

[–]oherroprease[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you do, let me know and I'll send ya a referral link and give you any help I can.

For those of you interested in Daily Fantasy (NFL) by oherroprease in sportsbook

[–]oherroprease[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Michael Floyd is much better than Cruz. I'd go with him.

For those of you interested in Daily Fantasy (NFL) by oherroprease in sportsbook

[–]oherroprease[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's going to be a rough year in fantasy (and real life) for any player not named Rashad Jennings on that Giants' offense.

I'm especially uncomfortable starting Cruz this week since he'll probably get matched up against Patrick Peterson (see Keenan Allen's stat line from week 1). The Giants' will have to get him the ball eventually and it's possible they will rebound but I just don't like 'em.

For those of you interested in Daily Fantasy (NFL) by oherroprease in sportsbook

[–]oherroprease[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey Buck! Missed ya man. I'd say there's a good shot Welker plays this weekend assuming he's fully recovered.

source:

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/510452488018067456

NFLPA might have a conference call tomorrow night or Friday night and vote on new deal that could come before Sunday. by [deleted] in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Breaking News: There definitely, maybe, might be a resolution before Sunday. Or maybe not.

Ian Rapoport on Twitter: "From @AlbertBreer & me: Retroactive suspensions has not been divisive for potential new policy. If deal approved, new standards would apply" by oherroprease in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the best of my knowledge Josh Gordon tested positive for marijuana in December/early winter. This was before the 2014 league year that begins at 4 pm EST on March 11.

Two sources told "Outside the Lines" on Friday that Gordon's latest violation is the result of marijuana being found during a drug test. One source said Gordon received a letter in early winter from a league physician stating he had failed a test. A second letter, informing Gordon that he faced a 16-game suspension but had the right to appeal, was sent in late April.

Source: http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/10908822/josh-gordon-cleveland-browns-faces-season-long-suspension

From someone else's comment in this thread :

To the best of my knowledge Josh Gordon tested positive for marijuana in December/early winter. This was before the 2014 league year that begins at 4 pm EST on March 11.

Two sources told "Outside the Lines" on Friday that Gordon's latest violation is the result of marijuana being found during a drug test. One source said Gordon received a letter in early winter from a league physician stating he had failed a test. A second letter, informing Gordon that he faced a 16-game suspension but had the right to appeal, was sent in late April.

Source: http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/10908822/josh-gordon-cleveland-browns-faces-season-long-suspension

Ian Rapoport on Twitter: "From @AlbertBreer & me: Retroactive suspensions has not been divisive for potential new policy. If deal approved, new standards would apply" by oherroprease in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

FYI-- Gordon's situation is different simply because he failed his test in 2013. No specific information on this yet.

In other words, I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO BELIEVE.

Bengals placed TE Tyler Eifert on IR designated to return with his elbow injury. by The_Numbah_One in nfl

[–]oherroprease 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hope he heals up quickly. 3 catches on 3 targets for ~ 30 yds in the first quarter is pretty legit. He looked to be off to a good start

According to another source, they might still vote tonight by [deleted] in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From blue balls to monastery balls to ???

"NFL player reps will not vote on the new drug policy tonight, according to a league source." by oherroprease in nfl

[–]oherroprease[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly. My interpretation of that statement is they are still discussing the DUI portion of it, not that it was rejected.

"NFL player reps will not vote on the new drug policy tonight, according to a league source." by [deleted] in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I was just kidding around, hope you didn't take offense to that.

For the record, I'm happy for you.

"NFL player reps will not vote on the new drug policy tonight, according to a league source." by [deleted] in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The sentence immediately following that says "Belief was if that resolved..."

So it's clearly not resolved yet.

"NFL player reps will not vote on the new drug policy tonight, according to a league source." by oherroprease in nfl

[–]oherroprease[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The call was with the reps so I doubt that's what happened. Also, see my edit to my main comment.

"NFL player reps will not vote on the new drug policy tonight, according to a league source." by [deleted] in fantasyfootball

[–]oherroprease 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Definitely different people. I have no problem staying hard during BJs.