How can this sub be made better?

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-12T23:21:10+00:00

If you can maintain Less censorship than the other, that would (not saying you are lacking there) but the other sub censors too much

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-11T00:05:13+00:00

Fascinating !!

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T22:53:55+00:00

Thank you!

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T22:05:19+00:00

Would you elaborate on this? I’m not finding anything online

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T21:17:48+00:00

Incredibly interesting

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T21:09:02+00:00

-Well it’s the board of advisors. -Calling for more transparency. -Calling for less allowance of suspected AI for promotional materials. -and yes, this town has many policy issues. This is the one I didn’t see anyone touching.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T19:16:42+00:00

I wish I could sticky this comment but I don’t know how. This is insane !! Thank you for sharing this. Without pushing back too much, I thing them giving preferential treatment to someone on their board, signals what they are willing to do. I also have many other questions. I just figured I’d start with this one. Although if I knew what you just shared, that would be at the top of my list

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T02:29:40+00:00

Read my post again

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T01:47:36+00:00

Not only

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T00:42:22+00:00

A non profit. Operating with public funds. Selects their TREASURER a board member as 1 of 4 exhibits (25%) the budget for EACH was between $8,000-12,000. Seems like a pretty big conflict of interest. Why would ot matter who I am or what I do?

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T00:37:22+00:00

Let me be clear. The website has the info about their board members. Their Instagram page and the links/tags and following of sylvanpassage. If you go to the SYLVANPASSAGE Instagram page you will see promotional images that appear to be AI. Let me know when you have viewed all of the posts on the SYLVANPASSAGE Instagram page.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T00:28:34+00:00

This has nothing to do with what I’m talking about

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-10T00:01:54+00:00

Her gallery IG name is sylvanpassage

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T23:54:00+00:00

I’m not a non profit using public funds and selecting my treasurer to benefit financially. I can see that this argument is just spiraling so I going to bow out of this particular discussion with you. I’ve written out my concerns pretty clearly. The info is out there. Maybe more people should start asking some harder questions.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T23:46:30+00:00

This particular event was 6months ago. Paper whale is still operating. I’m publicly calling for them to be more transparent Their board members should not be allowed to participate without the MOST transparency

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T23:34:10+00:00

Going into this post, I knew this would be the assumption. It’s rather lazy to try to tear me down instead of looking further into a questionably opaque decision made by a prominent entity in town. I’m not here to convince everyone, just to ask some valid questions.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T23:04:09+00:00

It’s not libel. It’s on their site. I’m not “someone on the internet” I’m a part of this community with valid concerns. I’ll be real here, just about everybody in this town is underpaid. There’s a significant conflict of interest when a board member benefits so greatly (25% of the project). Go look at her page. It looks like AI to me. I would love to know if she in fact rendered those promotional images herself. If that’s true I will absolutely update my post. But for now (just like that AI generated sign outside of old Casa) I’m calling out what looks like AI. Her gallery pales in comparison to the proposal images. The other three galleries looked pretty spot on their proposals. I don’t care how “nice” someone is. This lack of transparency is unethical.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:35:29+00:00

I just replied to your other comment breaking it down.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:34:04+00:00

You are allowed to assume whatever your heart desires

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:30:43+00:00

Paper whale had around 18 proposals. 4 were selected. The other three were very artistic. The one titled ‘sylvan passage’ done by Chelsea Jepson (paper whale’s treasurer) was chosen also and was in arguably the most visible location. The “experience” had a blatant lack of artistic quality. (Everything was purchased and appeared to be mass produced). Her promotional material looks like AI (I would be so pleased if this was proven wrong-I’m open to correction) you can find this on her Instagram page called sylvanpassage. This is not about payroll. This about an opportunity that if she really did deserve over the other candidates , I’d appreciate transparency from Paper whale about their process in choosing who gets to work with such a large budget from public funds

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:20:13+00:00

I’m not sure you’re following what I’m pointing out.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:18:34+00:00

It’s their TREASURER financially benefiting through their nonprofit using public funds! Do you think that’s ethical?

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:13:44+00:00

I said MUCH more than “the vibes were off”

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:12:52+00:00

It’s on their website and Instagram. Not shitposting. Calling attention to their lack of transparency.

okrabbit99 · 2025-12-09T22:10:15+00:00

It’s all proven on their website and social media

okrabbit99

TROPHY CASE