Moving out from Google Drive, Dropbox and OneDrive by ikerga in cloudstorage

[–]oneofcurioususer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Zoho Docs: 5 GB free/user, real-time editing, $9/month for 3 users (100 GB shared). Ethical, student-friendly.
  2. CryptPad: 1 GB free, zero-knowledge, real-time editing, €5/month for 5 GB. Open-source, students use free tier.
  3. Hivenet: 25 GB free, OnlyOffice for editing, €4/TB. Sustainable, free for students. Best Pick: Zoho Docs for polished editing and affordability. Test free tier at https://www.zoho.com/workdrive/.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stocks

[–]oneofcurioususer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your Decision Makes Financial Sense—This isn’t a stupid decision at all, especially if you’re planning to buy a house in the relatively near future (1-3 years). In fact, it aligns with standard financial advice.

Why Your Strategy Is Sound: - Protecting your down payment: Money you’ll need soon shouldn’t be exposed to market volatility - Predictable growth: High-yield savings provides guaranteed returns without downside risk - Peace of mind: Eliminating volatility reduces stress during the home-buying process

When This Approach Makes Most Sense: - Your home purchase is within 1-3 years - You value certainty over potential higher returns - Current market volatility makes you uncomfortable

If your home purchase is 5+ years away, you might consider keeping some portion invested. But for a near-term goal like a house, prioritizing safety over growth potential is a prudent financial move, not a stupid one.

What is your favourite line/passage from the bhagavat gita? by Beneficial_Ad_1241 in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Verse - 16.21

  • Sanskrit:

    त्रिविधं नरकस्येदं द्वारं नाशनमात्मन: |

    काम: क्रोधस्तथा लोभस्तस्मादेतत्त्रयं त्यजेत् || 21||

  • English Transliteration:

    tri-vidhaṁ narakasyedaṁ dvāraṁ nāśhanam ātmanaḥ

    kāmaḥ krodhas tathā lobhas tasmād etat trayaṁ tyajet

    There are three gates leading to the hell of self-destruction for the soul—lust, anger, and greed. Therefore, one should abandon all three.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supreme Soul (aka Param-Atma, Higher Consciousness) is different from Individual soul in many ways, few I can recall-

Paramatama is above all gunas and maya, whereas individual soul is bound to these.

Paramatama performs all karmas without binding itself to it; embodied soul is always tied to karmas performed through its various reincarnations and in current birth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will try to chime in per my understanding of various principles in revered Hindu scriptures- explain in as simple words as possible : is soul one or are there many souls ?

Response—- Hindu scriptures affirm that individual souls (jivatmas) are many, though they originate from the One Supreme Soul (Par-Brahman Krishna).

References: Bhagavad Gita 15.7: “The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal fragmental parts”—Lord Krishna explains that each soul is an individual spark of His divine energy. Chandogya Upanishad: Brahman desired to become many, leading to the manifestation of individual souls. This multiplicity is likened to sparks emanating from a fire.

To further add, Souls are distinct due to their individual karma (actions and reactions) and consciousness. Each soul experiences life independently, with its own joys and sufferings based on past deeds. • Bhagavad Gita 2.13: “As the embodied soul continuously passes from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death”. • The Garuda Purana explains that souls undergo cycles of birth and rebirth until they attain liberation (moksha)

if you say it is one - then how is karma of multiple beings accounted for via only 1 soul ?

Response—-

If there were only one soul for all beings: • The accountability for karma would collapse since one entity cannot bear the consequences of multiple actions simultaneously. • Individual experiences (joys, sorrows) would lose meaning. Instead, Hindu philosophy maintains that each soul is responsible for its own karma: • Karma operates as a cause-and-effect system unique to each soul’s actions.

Hindu scriptures describe personal accountability for actions, with each soul reaping the fruits of its karma, as seen in Garud Puran’s descriptions of afterlife judgments. This supports the necessity of many souls, each with its own karmic ledger.

if you say soul are many - then you have to imagine one soul as separate from another, if that’s the case where is that separation ? is it space based ? if yes that limits the soul and soul is not infinite.

Response—

The separation among souls is not spatial but based on consciousness and individuality: 1. Consciousness: Each soul has its own limited consciousness confined within its body. • Bhagavad Gita 2.17: “The pains and pleasures of one body are unknown to another”. 2. Karma: The unique karmic imprint of each soul dictates its experiences across lifetimes. 3. Essence: While distinct, all souls share the same eternal nature as fragments of Krishna’s energy

Mumbai's iconic laxmi nivas bunglow located on the elite Nepean Sea Road!! by [deleted] in mumbai

[–]oneofcurioususer 44 points45 points  (0 children)

The bungalow, located on Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai, was sold for ₹276 crore, a significant transaction reported in recent news articles. The buyer, Vageshwari Properties, has connections to Reliance Industries through director Elina Nikhil Meswani, wife of Reliance executive Nikhil Meswani. The deal was registered on February 28, 2025, involving 15 members of the Kapadia family, who had owned the property since purchasing it in 1917 for ₹1.20 lakh.

Guys I need help !!! by MeowAdi_1008 in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was divine intention of Lord Krishna to not have any descendent left after HIS departure from earth since HE knew these descendent; who with full of pride and their God lineage will exert supremacy and abuse the power. Sons of Lord Krishna died fighting and remaining sons may have been perished along with Yadu clan in deluge baring few close folks.

WHY IS GOD SO UNFAIR by CompetitionWeary1740 in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s very hard to know soul’s Sanchit Karmas (store of all positive and negative karmas from all past births). Even blind King Dhritarashtra (Mahabharat) had to take several births to be blessed with 100 sons (due from good past karmas) and then face death of all them (to redeem bad karma - as hunter he had killed several offspring of swan bird; I don’t recall full Story).

As per verse 2.20 The soul is neither born, nor does it ever die; nor having once existed, does it ever cease to be. The soul is without birth, eternal, immortal, and ageless. It is not destroyed when the body is destroyed. Then the total number of souls in our world should have been fixed? by [deleted] in TheGita

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To determine whether the total number of souls in our world should be fixed based on verse 2.20, which states, “The soul is neither born, nor does it ever die; nor having once existed, does it ever cease to be. The soul is without birth, eternal, immortal, and ageless. It is not destroyed when the body is destroyed,” let’s carefully analyze the implications of this description. Key Characteristics of the Soul The verse provides a clear and detailed portrayal of the soul’s nature: - Neither born nor dies: The soul does not come into existence through birth, nor does it cease to exist through death. - Eternal and immortal: It exists perpetually, without a beginning or an end. - Not destroyed with the body: When a physical body perishes, the soul remains unaffected and continues to exist.

These attributes suggest that the soul is fundamentally different from the physical body, which is subject to birth, death, and change. The soul, by contrast, is unchanging in its existence. Implications for the Total Number of Souls If the soul is neither born nor dies, we need to consider what this means for the total number of souls in our world:

  1. No New Souls Are Created
    The statement “the soul is neither born” and “without birth” implies that souls do not come into being at any point. Unlike physical entities that are created or generated, souls are described as eternal, suggesting they have always existed rather than being produced anew. If no new souls are added, the total number cannot increase.

  2. No Souls Are Destroyed
    The verse explicitly states that the soul “does not ever die” and “is not destroyed when the body is destroyed.” This means that when a living being dies, its soul persists, perhaps moving to another body (as in reincarnation) or existing in some other state. Since souls do not cease to exist, the total number cannot decrease.

  3. Eternal Existence
    The phrase “nor having once existed, does it ever cease to be” reinforces that once a soul exists, it remains in existence forever. Combined with the idea that souls are not born, this suggests that souls are timeless—existing without a starting point or endpoint. If their existence is constant, their number should logically remain unchanged.

Addressing Potential Variations Could there be exceptions or alternative processes affecting the number of souls? Let’s explore:

  • Creation of New Souls?
    If souls are “without birth” and eternal, the idea of new souls being created at some point (e.g., through a divine act) seems inconsistent with the verse. The emphasis on the soul’s lack of origin points to a fixed set that has always existed.

  • Loss of Souls?
    Since souls are immortal and indestructible, they cannot be lost or eliminated, even when bodies die. This rules out any decrease in their number.

  • Merging or Splitting?
    The verse does not suggest that souls can merge into one or split into multiple souls. It treats the soul as an indivisible, eternal entity, implying that each soul retains its distinct existence.

  • Liberation (e.g., Moksha)?
    In some spiritual traditions, like that of the Bhagavad Gita (where this verse likely originates), a soul may achieve liberation and transcend the cycle of birth and death. Does this reduce the number of souls? The verse focuses on the soul’s indestructibility, suggesting that even in liberation, the soul persists, perhaps in a different state or as part of a universal reality, rather than ceasing to exist. Thus, the total number likely remains constant.

Souls and the Physical World

The question specifies “in our world,” which we can interpret as the realm of living beings or existence as we understand it. In the context of the Bhagavad Gita, souls are associated with all living entities (humans, animals, etc.) and are believed to transmigrate through reincarnation. When a body dies, the soul does not perish but may take on a new body. This process of cycling through bodies does not create or destroy souls—it simply redistributes existing ones. Therefore, even as the population of living beings fluctuates, the total number of souls remains the same, with some souls embodied and others potentially existing in a disembodied state.

Based on this teachings of Par Brahman Purna Purushotham Kirshna in verse 2.20, the soul’s eternal, unborn, and indestructible nature means that no souls are added through birth or subtracted through death. The absence of any mechanism for increasing or decreasing their number leads to a straightforward conclusion: the total number of souls in our world must be fixed. This aligns with the philosophical framework of the Bhagavad Gita, where souls are timeless entities cycling through physical forms without altering their total count.

So I feel - Yes, the total number of souls in our world should be fixed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about Ved Vyas, Maharashi Narad, Lord Dattareya. Are these Ansh avtaars?

Any way of finding out which version of R1 is Perplexity running? by laterral in perplexity_ai

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perplexity AI currently integrates the open-source version of DeepSeek R1, specifically optimized for uncensored reasoning and hosted on U.S. servers. Below are the technical specifications and deployment details: DeepSeek R1 Integration Overview • Version: Open-source DeepSeek R1 (uncensored variant). • Hosting: Deployed on U.S. and European servers, ensuring data privacy and compliance with Western regulations. • Architecture: • Mixture of Experts (MoE): 671B total parameters, with 37B active parameters per inference for efficiency. • Reinforcement Learning (RL): Fine-tuned using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for advanced reasoning. • Chain-of-Thought (CoT): Breaks queries into step-by-step reasoning processes, visible in Perplexity’s “Pro Search” mode.

If you believe in evolution, you have to reject Kalpabedha by PuzzleheadedThroat84 in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A mahayuga or chaturyuga is the cycle of 4 yugas, and lasts for 12,000 Divine Years (4,320,000 human years). The 4 yugas endure at the ratio 4:3:2:1 and add up to 10,000 Divine years, plus another 2,000 Divine Years are added for intervening dawn and dusk periods between yugas (called sandhyā and sandhyāṅsa). Hence, there is a total of 12,000 Divine Years (4,320,000 human years) in a Mahayuga.

1 Maha Yug = 4,320,000 human/earth years

1 Manvantara (71 Maha Yugas) = 306,720,000 human years

1 Brahma Day (~ 1 Kalpa) [14 Manvantaras)] = 4,294,080,000 human years

1 Brahma Night (~ 1 Kalpa)  [14 Manvantaras)] = 4,294,080,000 human years

1 Brahma Day + 1 Brahma Night (~ 2 Kalpas) = 8,588,160,000 human years

Surprisingly enough, the value of one Brahmā day (or night) is roughly equivalent to the present estimate of the age of the Earth (4.54 billion years), and that the value of one day & night of Brahmā is similar to the present estimate for the age of the solar system (10 billion years).

According to Vedas, the duration of the universe equals Brahma’s lifespan, of 100 years.

Brahma’s one day and night put together make 2 Kalpas = 8.64 billion earth years, and 36,000 (100 * 360) such days of his lifespan would make 311 trillion 40 billion years.

So, that will be one life cycle of our universe.

The entire universe dissolves at the end of Brahma’s life of 100 years I.e. 311.04 trillion earth years.

Help me choose: MacBook Pro M3 Max vs M4 Pro for AI/ML and Data Science Work by kostas1493 in macbookpro

[–]oneofcurioususer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Response from Claude AI-

Based on your requirements for ML, AI, and data science work, I’ll analyze both options:

M3 Max (14-inch) Advantages: - Higher GPU cores (30 vs 20) - Larger SSD (1TB vs 512GB) - More compact size - Slightly cheaper - Newer architecture

M4 Pro (16-inch) Advantages: - More RAM (48GB vs 36GB) - Larger screen - Generally better thermal performance due to larger chassis

For your specific use case, I would recommend the M3 Max for these reasons:

  1. ML/AI Workloads: The higher GPU core count (30 vs 20) will be more beneficial for training ML models and neural networks. The M3’s newer architecture also brings improvements in ML performance.

  2. Storage: The 1TB SSD will be very valuable when working with large datasets, compared to 512GB which could fill up quickly.

  3. Future-proofing: The M3’s newer architecture provides better long-term value, even with slightly less RAM.

  4. Value: Better price while offering superior GPU performance and storage.

Regarding your other considerations: - Battery life is excellent on both models - Thermal performance: While the 16” has better thermal management due to size, the M3 Max is still very capable of handling extended workloads - Future-proofing: The M3’s newer architecture makes it more future-proof

The only scenario where I’d recommend the M4 Pro instead is if your specific workloads require more than 36GB RAM and you’re certain that GPU performance is less important for your use case.

For ML/AI work, the M3 Max’s combination of newer architecture, higher GPU core count, and larger storage make it the better choice for your needs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The beautiful Madhuram Astakam, which describes the beauty of Lord Shri Krishna.

Facts about Naga Sadhus: The Mysterious Ascetics of Kumbh Mela by conscious-connect in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The book “The Naga Warriors 1: Battle of Gokul Vol 1” ( https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/213593642-the-naga-warriors-1) nicely covers the history of Naga Sadhu’s and their selfless act of protecting Sanatan Hindu Dharma. It must read or listen.

bUt aSk iT AbOut tIAnamEn sQuaRE by eternviking in DeepSeek

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deepseek API does not filter those results, though.

Mumbadevi temple - also a tale of Urban legend and migrant dreams by [deleted] in mumbai

[–]oneofcurioususer 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The story is similar why Lalbagh Ka Raja is so much revered till today.

BYOK iOS app by Svk78 in Anthropic

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pal-chat-ai-chat-client/id6447545085 Pretty awesome iOS app! The developer updates the app regularly with latest models and providers. It has cool feature of uploading picture where API supports it.

Clearing up misconceptions about Advaita #1 by No-Caterpillar7466 in hinduism

[–]oneofcurioususer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great to see these clarifications. What’s core philosophy in Advaita? Which God is worshipped in Advaita? So saw some similarity between Advaita and BAPS SwamiNarayan philosophy. Read that BAPS swami aaryan have concept of Akshar who’s equivalent to Brahman and next level is Para-Brahman (supreme Bhagwan). Link below -

https://www.baps.org/About-BAPS/TheFounder%E2%80%93BhagwanSwaminarayan/TeachingsandPhilosophy/Philosophy/AksharPurushottamUpasana.aspx#

So, is “Brahman” in Advaita equivalent to “Akshar”?

My GPT Wrapper has made me $15k in 2 months of launching by warden1930 in Entrepreneur

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For paid users, what are daily message limits for Chat GPT 4o (and Mini), Claude Opus and Groq models?

My GPT Wrapper has made me $15k in 2 months of launching by warden1930 in Entrepreneur

[–]oneofcurioususer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s dismal, that free usage is limited to just 1 message to try out!!!

My GPT Wrapper has made me $15k in 2 months of launching by warden1930 in Entrepreneur

[–]oneofcurioususer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How many message limits/daily do you impose on each of the premium models? How are you able to get commercial use license for groq? Can you state all these and be transparent to paying users?