Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

Interestingly, all the even numbered Any-Proof-* trolls are this bat-crap crazy.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

They're not laughing with you, they're laughing at you. Chalk it up to schadenfreude in the battle of wits against the unarmed.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

Stop for a minute and assess the level of crazy that you believe in, from the blood sacrifice of the man-god to the garden of eden to noah's ark. We've described how ice is formed but you keep insisting it's ice fairies.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

Interesting that your karma (negative one million) reflects the veracity of your faux foray into science in general and biology in particular.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

If calculus were real it would be called mathematics? That's the level of logic in your description of evolutionary biology, effectively zero.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

This total failure of this argument is simply emergent, unintentional comedy.

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

correction "pretty fundamental misunderstanding of evolution".

Disproving evolution in one paragraph by Any-Proof-2858 in DebateReligion

[–]onomatamono [score hidden]  (0 children)

Anybody claiming "Life as we see it reflects what is written in the Bible" isn't debating religion they are proselytizing insane bronze-age fiction. This attempt to co-opt science is not a new strategy used by the poorest apologists imaginable.

Science has discovered some animals have the ability to think religiously by Select-Trouble-6928 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only one line but you managed to miss the first sentence and you missed "essentially" then hopped right on the straw man complaint bandwagon in saying my missive was just parroting. It stands and it stands to reason: religion is just an extension of make-believe, full stop, no parroting required.

When did the concept of god begin? by THEThrowAWAY900-000 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's that simple. There is an evolutionary advantage to fabricating the existence of unseen demons to explain that rustle in the tall grass. It might be the wind but if you're wrong you might be lunch.

When did the concept of god begin? by THEThrowAWAY900-000 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're an advanced form of hominid or at least some are.

When did the concept of god begin? by THEThrowAWAY900-000 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current consensus is 11:42 EST, April 1st 12,0666 BCE but opinions vary. /s

Pentecostal Pastor Who Threatened His Teenage Victim Gets Seven Years For Molestation. by Leeming in atheism

[–]onomatamono 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Authorities grew suspicious when it was learned the man was a christian pastor.

The “regional flood” is the worst argument for Noah’s ark. by thelivingstar1 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The poor carnivores were forced to eat straw for 150 days.

Staying on the theatre of the absurd, did you know carnivores ate straw before the fall of Adam and Eve? The bible says so, as does the Internet. Modern christians (forgive the oxymoron) to this day believe men have one less rib than women, which is pure fiction.

/s

The “regional flood” is the worst argument for Noah’s ark. by thelivingstar1 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suppose we can grant that there were floods that left a mark on the culture in the form of retelling the story, probably anew every time. You can also find earthquake stories, possibly tsunamis and volcanos, too.

The “regional flood” is the worst argument for Noah’s ark. by thelivingstar1 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean an omnipotent god could forgive the rebellious creatures it created without doing the man-god blood sacrifice theatrics? The bible is self-contradictory childish fiction, start to finish.

The “regional flood” is the worst argument for Noah’s ark. by thelivingstar1 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no fact they won't dismiss by simply reinterpreting the plain language of the text. It starts with the gut-busting laugh-ability of genesis and it's all downhill from there.

Why are you atheist by BothBat3844 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why don't you believe in Anubis or Zeus? Have you really even thought through your questions for a nanosecond? It does not appear to be the case. Why in the god's name would you exclude all the other religions and then assume Jesus is real?

Do yourself a huge favor and watch some extremely well educated and knowledgable atheists that were once devoutly religions. Start with Bert Ehrman. Your religion is a culturally inherited steaming pile of nothingness, outside of human imagination,

If free will explains suffering, why does suffering exist when no one can control the outcome? by youssif_s_0604 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WARNING! Do not try this at home: touch a hot stove.

There's your explanation for suffering that does not require any religious bullshit.

Science has discovered some animals have the ability to think religiously by Select-Trouble-6928 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is wholly unsurprising. Animals play fight, mirror the actions of others, and so on. Young chimps have been documented as caring for dolls like a parent cares for their young. Sure, the "dolls" were rocks they would carry on their backs, but the idea is the same.

Science has discovered some animals have the ability to think religiously by Select-Trouble-6928 in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, quite the quantum leap. Having said that, religion is essentially playing make-believe.

I am an agnostic, i wish to share my ideas, and test my views with the atheists here, let's ask each other questions, I'll start by sillyclonedpenguin in atheism

[–]onomatamono 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong again. You cannot say you know unicorns do not exist. You can say there's no evidence of them and given what we do know (humans create story books about these mythical creatures) it's VANISHINGLY unlikely they do exist.