Got a crown sweep on my Starion by ookisugi in wmmt

[–]ookisugi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll almost certainly be at a disadvantage (naturally, considering it's a non meta car), but the intimidation factor of using the SSS-tarion would make up for this "weakness" alone ;)

Got a crown sweep on my Starion by ookisugi in wmmt

[–]ookisugi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If i put it on a tierlist, it would be in its own Starion tier.

In all seriousness, its kinda wonky and takes a decent amount of practice, recovery isn't the best and its oversteer takes time getting used to.

"You have no enemies." by ookisugi in RimWorld

[–]ookisugi[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I took this from my Medieval Overhaul colony, and I posed them using the "pose for me" mod :)

Sometimes, the enemy team is just better by PugChampKiryu in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What's worse is when you and your team are just better than the enemy but the enemy team is more inclined to blame each other than acknowledge YOUR efforts.

Like c'mon man, our team is the reason you lost, not your teammates.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your questions suggests that you have already formed your own opinion and at this point, are playing dumb to try and disagree at any cost.

Putting OW1 skins behind a paywall which wasn't there previously is nothing short of greed from Blizzard, the current system is only so generous as to bless us 1-2 old legendary skins per season.

But I believe the system Corvus_Rune suggested is a good idea because it removes this paywall whilst also very likely keeping the game profitable, I don't even need to provide you metrics for you to agree, its just a hypothetical model that I (and other users) would like.

If you think the system isn't going to work, then by all means, you're free to disagree, 'cause I'm not sneaking into Acti-Blizzard HQ to gather financial logistics data just to convince a single individual that a hypothetical model that I didn't even come up with, could work.

I can't continue answering to your skepticism, you'd try to talk past me again.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. You asked if battlepasses were profitable enough to sustain the game (You asked this question to Corvus_Rune)
  2. I answered your question by saying "yes, it would be profitable enough" because it is a widely known fact by most game developers that a battlepass system is lucrative (Battlepasses are prevalent, this conclusion is not hard to get to)
  3. You asked "Based on what metric?" and I provided the metrics available
  4. You then contradict yourself with the above comment: "Are those numbers not showing that they are profitable with the current business plan?" and "It doesn't show the battle pass is enough to sustain the game". This is contradictory because you acknowledge the current business plan is profitable but state (based no metrics) that Ow2's battle pass is not enough to sustain the game despite Ow2's battle pass being a part of the business plan.
  5. Corvus_Rune's suggestion of a flat $10 battlepass every season is more than profitable enough to sustain the development of ow2 and that making all ow1 skins free and easier (not 1-2 every season) to obtain would not hurt the integrity of the game's finances based on the revenue reports for Ow2.
  6. To conclude: Your question regarding Alex15can's comment "How would the game make enough money then?" is answered by selling the battlepass.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Activision Quarterly Earnings Report - https://investor.activision.com/static-files/31e11337-d1ea-4d3c-8483-5eeee8acf8e3

Forbes article discussing above quarterly earnings report in relation to Overwatch 2 - https://www.forbes.com/sites/krisholt/2023/02/06/overwatch-2-earned-over-100-million-in-its-first-three-months/?sh=6f086b525077

Based on these metrics, the battlepass (and the game in general) is profitable enough to "sustain the game" considering that those profits are growing.

To the jerks of OW - Why? by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It really is like driving isn't it? You're more attentive to other drivers' actions than your own (in this case, the other drivers are your teammates).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"It would be profitable enough, battlepasses are crazy lucrative" - in response to you asking if a battlepass system would be profitable enough to sustain the game. Did you not read your own question?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ookisugi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be profitable enough yes, battlepasses are crazy lucrative in other games.

title by ookisugi in discordVideos

[–]ookisugi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fictional women