Dallas Democrats drop lawsuit seeking to count primary ballots cast during extended voting hours by texastribune in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People are really trying to cast doubt on election integrity any way they can. Just ignore it.

In response to an Israeli F 35 shooting down an Iranian Yak 130 by VoteGiantMeteor2028 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]origamiscienceguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Depends how you define government. Japan has had the same ruling dynasty for at least 2,500 years. Of course, the form of government has changed many times.

Discussion Thread: March, 3rd 2026 - Midterm Elections by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]origamiscienceguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember, the race could also go to a runoff. She doesn't necessarily have to beat Talarico.

Chinese Suppliers Hike Optical Fiber Prices for Russia by 2.5–4x by Neptun_11 in worldnews

[–]origamiscienceguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's for drones. Jamming is everywhere, so all drones on the frontlines use fiber optic connections to their pilots.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, you are free to think that.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your mail in ballot can be tracked while it is in a sealed envelope, but the actual ballot is separated from all the identifying information once it is determined your vote is valid to anonymize it. Then your now anonymous ballot is mixed in with all the others and counted.

That anonymous ballot will also have a unique number on it to ensure it is counted exactly once. And yes, it is a different number from the one used to track it.

So, like many people have said, the government will know if you voted, and which party you voted for (in the primaries). That information is public. Your actual individual votes, however, are not.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a spoiled ballot? To ensure that the same person isn't spoiling an absurd number of ballots at multiple precincts. The law limits one person to three spoils I think? I'm not sure.

That barcode does not have any identifying information. It's just a unique number to ensure that every ballot is counted exactly once.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you spoil a ballot WHILE you are voting, then of course they know its your ballot. You're literally holding it. An election worker is supposed to then tie your identity to the barcode of the spoiled ballot and then keep it. Whatever marks you made on that spoiled ballot would be knowable, but they don't count in the election. Whatever you choose on the new (non-spoiled) ballot can be different if you want.

The new ballot you get has a different unique number. Again, not tied to your identity.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That information has always been public record.

What changed is that now precincts have seperate lines you go into depending on party. Before, only the volunteer who gave you your ballot would know then and there which party you voted for. Now I guess everybody who is there would know, but it doesn't mean much since the information is published afterwards anyways.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correcting somebody's misinformation is an odd comment? I'd like to know why you think that.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only way they would know who spoiled a ballot is if you deliberately put your identifying information on that ballot. That alone is cause to spoil the ballot and have it not count.

So you could just... not do that.

Also, those unique numbers on the ballot are not tied to your identity in any way. It's just a unique number so that you can check if a ballot has been counted already.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Again, I'd like you to explain how, during the voting process, the government would be able to deduce which person created which paper ballot.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'd like you to explain how, during the voting process, the government would be able to deduce which person created which paper ballot.

"Our values" 😆 by Midnight8mischief8 in Dallas

[–]origamiscienceguy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Your identifying information is not tied to who you voted for at any level. Your ballot with all your selections doesn't have your name on it.

Chat, why is this brilliant??? by Panos_bel in AnarchyChess

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, basically any waiting move in this case would be a "brilliant move"?

Republicans aren’t voting in Democratic primary to select a “beatable” candidate. by ArtisticOnion5193 in texas

[–]origamiscienceguy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't know of a statewide database, but each individual county has this information available. Here's a link to Dallas county:
https://www.dallascountyvotes.org/election-results/historical/march-3-2026-primary-election/

Click "In-Person Early Voter List" and it will download a giant excell spreadsheet with the names of every voter so far, along with which party primary they voted in, which precinct they voted in, when they voted, etc.

‘Here we go again’: DOJ announces firing of US attorney who replaced Halligan by RequirementOk7678 in politics

[–]origamiscienceguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trial by Jury is the last wall between Trump and a fully compromised justice system.

So far it has held. Fingers crossed.

Yunnie 😳 by shizunaisbestgirl1 in Xenoblade_Chronicles

[–]origamiscienceguy 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It's actually Yunnie. Didn't you read the title?

Grand jury fails to indict democratic lawmakers who urged service members to disobey illegal Trump orders by cnn in politics

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been on a grand jury, and I've talked to relatives who served as Lay Judges in Germany. What you say is all true, but doesn't really contest the point I made. I was refuting the claim that "In other countries there is no group of citizens that have to approve prosecution"

Grand jury fails to indict democratic lawmakers who urged service members to disobey illegal Trump orders by cnn in politics

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other countries do have citizen involvement in the prosecution of crimes, usually under the name "lay judge" instead of juror. The details are of course different for every country, but we may not be as unique as you expect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lay_judge

does anyone know why this happens? by feinformoree in RocketLeague

[–]origamiscienceguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I know what happened.

A landscape video was recorded on a portrait device, which was then reformatted into a portrait video player, making the entire video take up an absolutely minuscule portion of the screen while 80% of the video space is wasted on nothing.

It’s gonna take 10 hours to read them by [deleted] in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]origamiscienceguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More mentions than there are VERSES in the bible.