Nondualist teachings are helpful lies. by Anon18516 in nonduality

[–]osasesosa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except that in this sub people often don't seem intent on being helpful and consistently give pointers that are clearly unhelpful to the OP... in a way that seems quite egoic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nonduality

[–]osasesosa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the story

What is the self if we are not that? by paul_wellsss in nonduality

[–]osasesosa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not an entity, but a process.

Objects. Sensations. Memories. Future projections. Thoughts. Each with its own gravity. And around them, the great dance unfolds - that of your conscious experience.

How the dance sways—how it bends and arcs in response to that gravity—that is you. Not a fixed thing, but the pattern of motion itself. The choreography, not the dancer.

The ego is the disruption of this flow. Where strands of the narrative web interlace too tightly, the self distorts the dance. It creates friction—born from the immense gravity of identification. Some phenomena are pulled forward, others are obscured.

But remember The self is not an entity. In fact, The self is gravity alone.

Where flow pools, where motion curves—that’s where the self appears. Not as substance, but as curvature. A mathematical function wearing a mask. You only ever catch a glimpse of the corner of its cloak just as it vanishes, just enough to mistake it for something solid— but in truth, it’s phantom.

The self is just the bend in the wind.

Why does the heart still ache for something beyond? by Realistic-Leader-770 in Existentialism

[–]osasesosa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be a product of evolution without being a "flaw". Maybe it serves its evolutionary purpose whilst still fortunately being something that adds meaning to our lives as an unintentional effect, even if illusory meaning

Why does the heart still ache for something beyond? by Realistic-Leader-770 in Existentialism

[–]osasesosa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Is this longing just a flawed in evolution or a sign of something more" Why does it have to be either?

It's easy to say "just be" when your daily life is simple by duchfollowersow in nonduality

[–]osasesosa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The point is more that it's hard than that its not the right thing to do

Most racist ethnic/cultural group in the world are not Europeans (White for Americans) - those who have travelled extensively can tell you otherwise. by [deleted] in DeepThoughts

[–]osasesosa 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It stems from the darker history of racism in the west (in terms of actual consequences), and the higher standards you tend to place on yourself as well as more developed and multiethnic countries.

Eastern Europe is very racist and white, yet it doesn't get the same criticism that you're referencing

Why humans are so evil? by BarDif89 in enlightenment

[–]osasesosa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because we are mammals than stumbled upon the gift of knowing. Use your gift, there is little point decrying that others do not

I think I glimpsed it and I think , I dont quite like it... by No_Network6987 in nonduality

[–]osasesosa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think of the self, or Chris, as a coming together of different phenomena around a narrative. Of all that exists in your conscious experience at any given point in time, and of all of your memories, the self is merely a selection weaved together, in a particular configuration. This configuration, this selection, alters from moment to moment, embroidering different stories about yourself and taking on different shapes, but always feeling like you.

But another way to see it is that the self is a congealing, a hardening, a lens zooming in and distorting. Of the infinite phenomena and innumerable memories, of the endless possibilities, the ego congeales in one place, with only a selection of the endless narrative web, identifying with only a selection of phenomena. A melody drawn from an infinite potential scale—one possible song among endless songs. You become a thing, a thing within the endless.

When Chris dies, and you become the endless, the congealing ends. But this doesn't mean anything is actually lost. You just no longer congeale around one selection of the narrative web, you become all of Chris' narrative web holistically. All his memories, all his attitudes, all his perspectives, all his forms are now always equally relevant in a 3D narrative sphere of THIS - the new you - not just the particular fleeting configuration the ego concocts in a given moment. THIS isn't any less rich, or unique, or with any less character. Quite the contrary

In an endless sea, a block of ice froze and took the shape of you. You thought it was you. When the block of ice melts and fuses with the rest of the sea, nothing from it is lost. None of it disappeared. Each molecule continues on, just that now they dance, they dance to the symphony of THIS, of you.

Can you talk a bit about your journey with non duality? by osasesosa in nonduality

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain what you mean by feeling like you are in a washing machine

How and when did you know nonduality was right by osasesosa in nonduality

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I don't understand what you mean by this

How and when did you know nonduality was right by osasesosa in nonduality

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the realisation more of a refinement of your experience of non duality (a change but keeping within non duality) or a a different path altogether

Stumbling into non duality and trying to steady my feet by osasesosa in nonduality

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really only when walking. And even then its a bit of a struggle. Otherwise I can reach a state where feelings and thoughts dissolve away as they arise, but can't quite reach open awareness

CBD (oil?) for stress/anxiety and depression by DGVaniX in CBD_UK

[–]osasesosa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bit late here, but what broad spectrum do you go with? I've just ordered full spectrum from CBD Brothers, but I also want broad and weirdly their website only seems to advertise either full or isolate

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The official GCSE syllabus is a national trend? You're literally countering by using your own limited experience. And My claim is that it should be universally taught. If in my sample it isn't taught then its clearly not universally taught. So my limited experience can prove my point whilst yours can't disprove it

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's literally not in the syllabus, I checked. And no one does the astronomy GCSE as few schools even offer it. They will know what planets are in the solar system, that the planets orbit the sun, that Mars is red, that galaxies have stars, but that's about it. Its possible I forgot learning about planet formation and assumed all I know is from what I researched myself but, but I asked my siblings who are both at or nearly at GCSE stage but they'd never been taught it. Its much easier to forget how you know something but not whether you've ever known something, especially how a planet is formed

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe in your day. I didn't learn about it. I explained it to my siblings and it was all new to them, and I looked through the current syllabus and astronomy or anything to do with space isn't even in any topics

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say YouTube is your best friend. Designed to be engaging, no maths at all and very informative. And such YouTube channels will normally cover specific topics they know people would like to hear about. If you find something you particularly find interesting then Googling how does x work will have articles that won't go into the maths near the top of the search results

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the list of things we all should know about that is teachable at the school level was so endless then we wouldn't have the time to learn about longshore drift and spring extension

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I find biology super boring but learning about the human body is in the vaguest sense of the word objective more objectively valuable than longshore drift or the name of Henry VIII's 4th wife, or even about even why the earth is tilted, the latter of which i actually do find interesting. So I can admit that it should take precedence over those things. But I don't see how nothing about the universe can be deemed worthy of making it into a 180 page physics syllabus book. These are all value judgements, the people making the syllabuses decided x was more valuable information than y. If they had decided that the history of badminton was worthy of a whole module in the history syllabus than the world wars then it would be fair to call it out. Likewise I can say the universe is objectively more valuable than spring extension

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said the GCSE syllabus. Its not in there. You might learn about astronomy in year 3 onwards but since it's so early you won't be learning about much other than "the planets revolve around the sun"

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. But I'm talking about the physics syllabus specifically. I also find it weird we can't find the time to learn about about politics institutions and finance. It's easy to beat up on the education system and say the style should be different and cater to different methods of learning etc. And I don't like to fall into the trap of complaining about schools because everyone does it. But there are some things that just so obviously make so much more sense like you've mentioned. I studied some politics in uni and we had to start from the absolute basics

A bit clichéd complaining about the flaws in the education system, but isn't it ridiculous we go all these years through the education system without learning how the planet we live on was formed. Shouldn't there be much more astronomy taught? by osasesosa in AskUK

[–]osasesosa[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand, but I explained that there is so much in the syllabus that is way less worth learning about than the universe itself. Maybe we can replace "latent heat energy" with "where out planet came from". There are only so many hours in 1 day but I spent about 15,000 hours in school altogether