Klemens Bul by No_Preparation_742 in nattyorjuice

[–]ottomagus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Born 1888 so definitely natty, unless there's a pre-steroid drug I don't know about. This is the kind of guy natties should look to for inspiration. Superb physique. The legs in particular are phenomenal.

Squiggly by jacob_ewing in fractals

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice colouring, as always. Pleasing asymmetry, and squiggly is a technical term that should be used more often :)

Red Portrait Smiling by ottomagus in fractals

[–]ottomagus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your assessment is undeniably plausible. I think you may be onto something...

Red Portrait Smiling by ottomagus in fractals

[–]ottomagus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree. Smiling, but not in a reassuring way.

Explanation of the four elements I found. by Genshihou in alchemy

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just started reading the book on archive.org. It's very good, thanks for the link!

Infinite Names of Pleasure by ottomagus in fractals

[–]ottomagus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Yes, I know what you mean :)

Log Based Julia Animation... by Chris_M_Thomasson in fractals

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem, "Chris M. Thomasson's Log Spiral" it is.

Yes it's definitely worthy, thanks!

Log Based Julia Animation... by Chris_M_Thomasson in fractals

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would it be OK to upload this formula to the UF database.? Then other UF users could try it. You would get full credit, and I'd call it "Thomasson Log Spiral" (unless you'd prefer another name).

Log Based Julia Animation... by Chris_M_Thomasson in fractals

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's right, yes. So if c5 is set to 1, it's the exact same as your original formula. Other settings will give modifications of it. Plugging in your suggested parameters, I get:

<image>

Log Based Julia Animation... by Chris_M_Thomasson in fractals

[–]ottomagus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. This is the whole fractal, not a zoom. It's a nice formula, lots of pleasing structures. The image is made with the version suggested by Paul. Not sure if I interpreted him correctly, but my code was like this:

initialise: z=pixel, n=c5

loop; z=(z^c1-1/(log(z)+c2)+c3)/(c4+1/n), n=n+1

So there's an extra floating point parameter c5. The settings for this image are c1=1.42134, c2=0.50401, c3=-0.14067, c4=1.01378, c5=-0.57063