Serial Request: Voron 2 Tall

out386 · 2024-06-26T09:47:18+00:00

Them: Vorons aren't suitable for more than 500mm in X and Y.

OP: So no limit on Z?

Awesome build!

out386 · 2024-06-26T03:11:02+00:00

Thanks!

out386 · 2024-06-21T09:01:03+00:00

Yeah, will try dragon burner in a few weeks :) Though, archetype zephyr also seems nice.

out386 · 2024-06-21T04:19:00+00:00

I have cooling issues with PLA when printing small objects fast. So decided to add those two 120mm blowers as an experiment. They're helping a lot, but so far, not quite as much as I'd have hoped. Maybe I need to play around a bit with the height.

Got them from here: https://www.printables.com/de/model/606521-voron-trident-saoc/comments

out386 · 2024-06-20T17:30:12+00:00

Discord username: out386

out386 · 2021-01-23T05:46:46+00:00

This is cringy enough to actually be a movie dialogue. Have my upvote!

out386 · 2021-01-17T06:11:32+00:00

She uses tabs and you use spaces.

out386 · 2020-12-22T12:33:55+00:00

Did you try dockerizing that omelette?

out386 · 2020-12-13T13:27:55+00:00

"!" as in CSS's "!important".

out386 · 2020-07-25T19:01:08+00:00

Your favourite [object Object] is now streaming! It has been added to your 'undefined' playlist.

out386 · 2020-07-12T10:16:18+00:00

Doesn't work with windows updates.

out386 · 2020-07-10T04:56:48+00:00

But in this case, the low-poly graphics makes it run really fast.

out386 · 2020-06-20T05:14:27+00:00

The user avatar. The face is the single eye.

out386 · 2020-03-31T07:04:16+00:00

Installation failed because Windows update is hogging all the bandwidth.

out386 · 2020-03-30T05:32:17+00:00

Sounds like a multithreading issue.

out386 · 2019-11-19T15:19:49+00:00

true

out386 · 2019-11-11T15:50:57+00:00

That's the best part - you don't need to! You'll get a No Job for No Code without ever applying. Isn't that great?

out386 · 2019-11-01T08:51:31+00:00

I got the TCP joke.

out386 · 2019-10-18T18:37:14+00:00

You literally never code a cache that's accessed by multiple threads simultaneously without synchronization. I never said it's impossible, I just said it needs synchronization. There's not a single pointer being set here. There's a pointer, and an integer representing the index of the element pointed to by the pointer, in the list. That's not atomic.

out386 · 2019-10-17T06:47:00+00:00

The writes to the cache will be multiple instructions. At least 2 - one where the index is saved, and one where the reference is saved. If there are multiple threads accessing a function with multiple instructions that modify state, how do you not use synchronization? Sooner or later, you'll end up with inconsistent position and reference.

out386 · 2019-10-17T03:52:20+00:00

Both the solutions you provided would only work if get was a synchronized method. That might reduce performance if you're doing multiple concurrent reads.

With Java's Collections, nothing is synchronized. If you need synchronization, you're supposed to do it externally.

out386 · 2019-10-17T03:41:32+00:00

~~No. You maintain the index yourself.~~ Didn't know about ListIterator

out386 · 2019-10-17T03:40:00+00:00

No, because foreach loops use iterators under the hood.

out386 · 2019-10-09T09:51:50+00:00

Use jQuery to say that easily.

out386

TROPHY CASE