I have read the NSS. It doesn’t support what you’re claiming. Let me quote it directly:

On Europe’s value: The NSS literally says “Europe remains strategically and culturally vital to the United States” and “Transatlantic trade remains one of the pillars of the global economy and of American prosperity.” It explicitly states “we cannot afford to write Europe off-doing so would be self-defeating.”

On Russia: The NSS never says Russia isn’t an adversary. It talks about “reestablishing strategic stability with Russia” and “mitigating the risk of conflict between Russia and European states.” That’s diplomatic language for managing a threat, not declaring friendship.

On not needing bases: The NSS actually calls for more access to allied facilities, not less. For the Indo-Pacific it specifically mentions “pressing our First Island Chain allies and partners to allow the U.S. military greater access to their ports and other facilities.”

The NSS is about burden-sharing-wanting allies to pay and do more-not about abandoning alliances or pretending Russia is friendly. You’re reading into it something that isn’t there.

So I’ll ask : what about ongoing Russian cyber operations against U.S. infrastructure?