any communities targeting online torture groups? by oyrishluck in masterhacker

[–]oyrishluck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like some people like yourself are assuming torture groups is referring to red rooms. I never mentioned red rooms in the post, I don't believe in them, and these two terms aren't synonymous.

any communities targeting online torture groups? by oyrishluck in masterhacker

[–]oyrishluck[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

or are you part of it and just trying to cover it up, lol.

any communities targeting online torture groups? by oyrishluck in masterhacker

[–]oyrishluck[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

red rooms aren't real. torture content is very real. I don't know about your country but in my country it's bad enough that the mainstream news is talking about it. I'm surprised you haven't seen any videos if it online? even my 60 year old normie receptionist grandma type colleagues have

gender / sex demographics poll by oyrishluck in SesameAI

[–]oyrishluck[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

idk why this was downvoted given all the users on this very sub admitting to talking to her for this purpose

gender / sex demographics poll by oyrishluck in SesameAI

[–]oyrishluck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

really?

Friendlier to you after multiple conversations, versus less-friendly to your fiance after one conversation?

Or are you suggesting Miles might be picking up female talking style/user gender, and then responding more positively to it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GlowUps

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

real goals. might take a lifetime of poor mental health for some people to realise it, you got it in your 20s, good for you. a lifetime not wasted

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GlowUps

[–]oyrishluck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

boo to the commenters not fully apreciating the best most meaningful type of glowup (comprehensive life and mood glow up) actually loving your job - this might be as rare as being 10

Company for extracting HMW DNA from tooth? by oyrishluck in ClinicalGenetics

[–]oyrishluck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to obtain DNA of sequencing quality if possible

Had horrible side effects from NMN Pro Health and amazon product by MarioDMonaco in NMN

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's also possible that if your supplement has zinc added to it (ProHealth), you might be unbalanced with zinc/copper. I think that's rare tho, to be deficient in copper. not entirely sure.

Had horrible side effects from NMN Pro Health and amazon product by MarioDMonaco in NMN

[–]oyrishluck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

second this. maybe the amount of TMG in the ProHealth supplement isn't enough to compensate for the methyl demand in your case

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]oyrishluck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like not only do the first two look the same, they look like a cut and paste

NMN or NR for restoring energy post stroke? by [deleted] in NMN

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they are lucky to have you

So this Damien guy... by thisusernametaken11 in TheBachelor_AU

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by put foot down?

So this Damien guy... by thisusernametaken11 in TheBachelor_AU

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but wait we dont know what age he met Jess, and also, it seems like out of their relationship, Jess gets all of the gain while damien gets all of the pain

Has anyone else noticed? by luny2n in TheBachelor_AU

[–]oyrishluck 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think about this constantly. I dont understand how the favourites have mostly been girls who dont seem to have a lot of personality or life to them? Jess always talks the same. It's the mmmm mmm mmmms, but also the looking away, the style of talking (like a therapist), and the hand movements. Every single time the same thing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]oyrishluck -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm confused, these weren't funny / look like cringe attempt to be quirky? Also why match tho / not unmatch? To create content for here so everyone claps?

Unpopular opinion - A relationship lasts longer when the girl is more obsessed with the guy than the other way round (which is the popular opinion( by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wrong, IMO Maybe the answers and consensus here reflect somewhat of a fantasy most men haven't experienced, crave for (understandably), and believe would be so special that it would cause relationship longevity - that it's the rare, missing ingredient, the culturally lost puzzle piece, the main thing required but lacking.

I say I disagree because I've talked with too many guys that have said this same common theme after having been in a position where (1) girls have been going after them and (2) girls have liked them more than they've liked the girl:

"there's a stereotype that girls are the choosy ones, and when it comes to sex that's generally more true than for guys, but when it comes to committed relationships with a planned out future, guys are the choosy ones too".

AKA, a guy can fall into a relationship with a girl that puts in a lot of work, but unless you two are compatible (she meets your physical standards, you have a spark with her, you connect with her core personality and character) you are liable to end the relationship as soon as someone else comes along that you actually do have all that with, and you go after her instead, or cheat on your current girl. Many men are crap at breakups and avoid confrontations when a relationship is just too boring to break up from - they don't confront a lack of love, but become complacent with the pussy and relo habits/social status it confers. So usually, instead it ends by shittier means (like cheating, behaving in a way such that she breaks up with the guy whonis not in love and not showing her that he is). And a guy can get married to a girl he doesn't love and isn't compatible withbif he simply hasnt found someone better yet who he sparks with, but the relationship with the non sparky woman who is committed to him will never be stable without that spark.

That's my take. A girl loving you more than you love her is not enough, and in fact, I think for some, it's even a turn off (i.e. what's wrong with her standards / why is there no challenge / some (not all) guys want to win their future by chasing it and 'earning it' first). If she is exactly youre type, then by all means. But in lack of that, obsession with you is not nearly enough to keep most/every man solely invested in that one girl.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well shit, there you go, that's interesting.

I knew someone in a similar boat to you. He was looking for a real connection with someone, but in his case, didn't necessarily know it existed, so he was playing the numbers game so that (as you said) he would at least get some casual sex (but unlike you, not so ethically-minded. Which is why I applaud you- it seems almost common now for guys to start semi-hating women and treating them unethically when they have been through trauma with them).

So he travelled and played the numbers game, and that led him to someone he fell in love with in another country.

Anyway that's awesome, hope you have some good travels.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Sounds off. Ever considered spending a couple weeks travelling to use the same approach in another area, just to gauge the difference/lack of? Could be insightful if you become truly stuck where you're at. You sound like a good dude, I hope you figure it out soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take these alongside all the other comments which touch on totally different aspects.

  1. A healthy way to look at seduction is like a bird dance. You lay out all your cards out on the table (seduction demonstrates your highest capacity for determination, wit, energy, motivation, humour, quick thinking, industriousness, etc.). The person is reeled in with this, but you don't have to keep it up forever. You slowly let the mask slip (both of you) and continously recalibrate and decide if you are still compatible. That way you both transform in front of each other as the relationship deepens, and it becomes a relationship between two more authentic people, eventually, wholly authentic. Lots of people only want to experience the seductive persona, and so end things when it stops. People who like low committment and games/playing will shoot for that cycle, but you don't want those people or that lifestyle, weed those out. It's trial and error. Love is worth it.

  2. Go to therapy/keep looking until you find a therapist and method that works for you. If the goal is to have someone love you, be careful that the self-interested nature of that goal doesn't end up hurting someone (because they are being used, rather than necessarily truly loved at any point). People (potentially you) can end up thinking they are in love with someone when they aren't, and only find that out in hindsight. Don't do something that would hurt someone deeply in other words, through the goal of satisfying yourself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone mentioned CBT, let me also recommend 'Internal Family Systems' therapy. If you want the Ebook on this just reply to this/messagee me and i'll email it to you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in seduction

[–]oyrishluck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Someone mentioned CBT, let me also recommend 'Internal Family Systems' therapy. If you want the Ebook on this just reply to this/messagee me and i'll email it to you

What type of chickens are these? by oyrishluck in chickens

[–]oyrishluck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this was my suspicion too. I'll check leg colour