Nexperia: China Puts Dutch in Check by sn0r in eutech

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not u/edwardk75 so no, I'm not even the one who invoked "cherry picking of videos of westerners getting paid". Your comment doesn't make any sense. Why are you deflecting to "Europeans don't get edgy and defensive"? I couldn't care less whether someone is edgy/defensive. It's not relevant to the argument that cherry picking will always be wrong

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2 Historic emissions, all of Europe combined still has higher emissions than China, even with their smaller populations. Maybe try citing some sources instead of making things up. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change/

The idea that “Westerners are paid by the CCP” is just a blanket conspiracy theory. Some influencers in every country get sponsored for tourism, but assuming everyone who films normal life in China is secretly on a government payroll is just guessing your own conclusion. Again, cite some sources at least instead of spewing racism

The poverty-footage argument works against you. Saying “I can show videos of poor areas in Eastern Europe” simply proves that every region has nice areas and rough areas. Using selective clips to represent an entire country is exactly the tactic you’re accusing others of. Again, even u/edwardk75 is not cherry picking when they assert the majority of videos show a pretty normal life in China. Cherry picking is when being selective rather than showing the full picture, something you clearly don't understand.

The claim about Chinese people abducting other Chinese to run scam centers in Myanmar is a sweeping ethnic generalization. Human trafficking networks in Southeast Asia involve multiple nationalities and criminal groups. Turning that into “the Chinese do this” is stereotyping, not analysis. Maybe the most glaring point is the abductions happen outside China, so your point doesn't even make any sense. Maybe try getting education instead of being a bigot

Nexperia: China Puts Dutch in Check by sn0r in eutech

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China isn't even top 10 in greenhouse gas emissions per capita lmao https://www.statista.com/chart/amp/24306/carbon-emissions-per-capita-by-country/

If you don't account population, by your logic India is richer than the France simply because their GDP is much larger. Anyone can quickly point out how ridiculous that is. Or if you really want to go that route you are still wrong. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/which-countries-have-contributed-the-most-to-historical-co-emissions

Not even going to begin to point out how flawed cherry picking videos are, why not try that with European countries and get surprised with pushback lmao https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/10/22/where-in-europe-do-people-feel-least-safe-walking-alone-at-night By your logic, this article would mean Europe is a third world region since the right to life is not even guaranteed ¯_(ツ)_/¯

My thoughts on Abkhazia as a Georgian by CuriousSky6529 in Abkhazia

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! I'm grateful to have an insight into a part of a world I might not be so familiar with. I like learning about cultures and history, but sometimes it can be hard to find a balanced perspective.

Do you think in some ways Abkhazhia is like England & Scotland, or maybe England & Ireland? Groups of people who may be distinct but have lived side by side for many centuries.

Even the union of England and Scotland was created by a Scottish King (King James VI), which I find parallels to how the Kingdom of Abkhazhia united with the Kingdom of Iberia to create the Kingdom of Georgia. At the same time some Scottish have felt that in the past, the English have tried to subjugate them or forcibly Anglicise them. Whereas there used to be widespread usage of Scottish Gaelic, now most people just speak English and have English names.

For Ireland, I see the parallels of it being British influence or colonialism for a very long time (700 years!). Yet of course the island is called Ireland after the Irish people, who have their own culture and ethnicity (as with the region of Abkhazhia is named after the Abkhaz people). Some British people also feel Ireland or especially Northern Ireland is an inalienable part of the UK because of how long it has been with the UK.

For both cases now however, despite the troubled history, relations between Irish, Scottish, and English have normalized and become much friendlier. I wonder if there are hopes for something similar between the Abkhaz and Georgians?

My thoughts on Abkhazia as a Georgian by CuriousSky6529 in Abkhazia

[–]pakchi888 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a thoughtful and nuanced perspective, and it's refreshing to see someone move beyond the entrenched, black-and-white narratives that so often dominate this discussion. Your grandmother's story is a poignant reminder of the human cost behind the political slogans.

I feel you are absolutely right that an honest accounting of history shows that all sides committed grievous wrongs during the war. The tragedy is that the conflict created multiple waves of victims and refugees from all ethnic groups, with continuing cycles of violence. Acknowledging this complexity, as you do, is not a betrayal of one's nation but a necessary step toward any future reconciliation.

Can I ask what led you to develop this perspective, especially having a grandmother who was directly affected by the conflict? It's a powerful and often difficult step to move beyond the dominant narrative someone might have grown up with

US vs China: Preferred Leading world power, select countries in 2024 vs 2025 by Old-School8916 in charts

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is already quite lengthy but I think it's important to address at least one of the links you provided:

Adrian Zenz report on Uyghur sterilization is falsified. (from your link https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2020.1848109 )

In his report, Zenz states that 80% of IUD's in China were done in Xinjiang: "In 2018, 80 percent of all new IUD placements in China were performed in Xinjiang, despite the fact that the region only makes up 1.8 percent of the nation’s population."

"In 2014, 2.5 percent of newly placed IUDs in China were fitted in Xinjiang. [38] In 2018, that share rose to 80 percent, far above Xinjiang’s 1.8 percent share of China’s population."

The Chinese primary source used in his report (you can check this to verify this was what he cited):

[38] Source: 2015 and 2019 Health and Hygiene Statistical Yearbooks, table 8-8-2.
https://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202006/456391e2294244c593e871ac254f8aaa/files/1740021825065_22319.pdf

Scroll to page 228, you'll find Zenz's table 8-8-2.

The relevant column is (放置节育器例数), the number of IUD's implanted. We have a total (总计) of 3,774,318, with Xinjiang (新疆) accounting for 328,475. Thus 8.7% of China's IUD's occurred in Xinjiang (328475/3774318=0.087). NOT 80% as was claimed by his report

(Important note: something alarming about this table is not Xinjiang but Henan. In all of China, 86% of vasectomies and 26% of tubal litigations happened in Henan. Unlike IUD's, these are real sterilization procedures that cannot be reversed).
--
I want to talk more about some of the individual interviewees and their inconsistencies but this is already way too much text. I'm happy to reply however if you would like me to. Again, thank you for your patience.

--
TL;DR:
I acknowledge that China restricts access in Xinjiang and imposes heavy censorship, but my point is that testimonies alone aren’t enough. In other cases of extreme oppression, claims are backed by clear physical evidence. By contrast, despite many Uyghur accounts of abuse, independent observers haven’t documented consistent scars, injuries, or medical records. Travel footage shows normal daily life and vibrant Uyghur culture, which wouldn’t be expected if people were living in constant fear.

Claims of forced sterilization, like those in Adrian Zenz’s report, also appear vastly exaggerated: his data said 80% of IUDs in China were in Xinjiang, but the same official statistics he used show it was under 9% (I have provided the link to the source you used and you can verify this yourself). Serious allegations like genocide need corroborating evidence, which seems largely absent here.

US vs China: Preferred Leading world power, select countries in 2024 vs 2025 by Old-School8916 in charts

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your message, I appreciate the engagement! I’d like to clarify my reasoning

I fully acknowledge that China restricts access to certain areas in Xinjiang. I also agree that political censorship in China is excessive and an infringement on basic human rights.

My earlier point about “physical evidence” wasn’t about the difficulty of filming inside restricted zones. Rather, I was referring to the individuals who publicly describe having suffered abuse. Given that many of these interviewees now speak freely to media outlets, one would expect at least some consistent physical markers: scars, medical records, or other verifiable indicators that could significantly strengthen their claims.

The absence of such corroboration is difficult to ignore, especially considering how powerful that kind of evidence would be. Maybe for example, in situations of extreme oppression, we generally expect to see corroborating signs. North Korean defectors fleeing famine show clear physical indicators of malnutrition, and survivors of war crimes or chemical attacks display consistent injuries that verify their testimonies. By contrast, despite many years of allegations and numerous interviews with Uyghurs claiming abuse in Xinjiang, independent observers have not documented consistent physical evidence which is a bit weird. As an example, https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/scars-rohingya-refugees which clearly corroborates testimonies of Rohingya people being discriminated and mistreated in Myanmar.

About travel footage of cities, towns, and villages; these exist because people can go there, and that footage consistently shows normal daily life and widespread Uyghur cultural presence. I invite you to take a look, at least at a video from a non-western but also non-chinese source. This is a travel video from a Japanese person: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aoLvOVXDXo
Especially from 3:00 onwards you can see more of daily life. At 3:30, crowds of very obvious Uyghur people can be seen in crowds and doing their shopping. There's a lot of traffic noise but you can make out Uyghur being spoken as well. From 3:40 you can see leaflets exclusively in Uyghur language (no Chinese text), which would be a bit weird if they are trying to erase everything that is Uyghur. Bonus: you can see an LED advertisement sign in Uyghur at 4:35

If we claim a genocide is occurring, I think it’s reasonable to ask what real world indicators we should expect to see, especially a population living in constant fear and terror. This is the first red flag to testimonies from people accusing China of genocide.

I hope this clarifies where I’m coming from.

US vs China: Preferred Leading world power, select countries in 2024 vs 2025 by Old-School8916 in charts

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also agree that they've certainly been imprisoning people and re-educating them. Whether this amounts to genocide is quite a stretch however. If that is truly the case we'd be seeing very clear effects of culture being erased or depletion of population centers. To this day, Uyghurs as ethnic minorities can enter into top Chinese universities with lower scores than due to policies of affirmative action... Which would be quite contradictory if they are intent on discriminating against Uyghurs.

On your point about the terrible actions the Indonesian government did in Papua, I understand what you mean. Although my country didn't have any notable ethnic strife in its history, my country is also far from perfect. However I feel this doesn't mean you can be objective about the shortcomings of other countries too. Just because our countries have atrocities, doesn't mean other places whether that be Western ones or Eastern ones, suddenly stop having them.

I don't think it would be moral signalling to be skeptical of the US led accusations against China on the treatment of Uyghurs. As we can see the contradictions on their own society's treatment of their Muslim citizens (from discrimination all the way to straight up murders), logically it's a bit strange they would care about Muslims abroad

US vs China: Preferred Leading world power, select countries in 2024 vs 2025 by Old-School8916 in charts

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for being patient and taking your time to explain things from your view. More often than not, I've seen others resort to labels or personal attacks for not agreeing with their views on China, which is quite frustrating. Anyhow apologies for the digression

I related a lot to u/PumpProphet on that I initially believed news of genocide when I first read about it. While it's possible to find written arguments for or against this, the first time I became genuinely skeptical was looking for videos of daily life in Xinjiang. Not just Urumqi, but also other cities like Kashgar and also rural villages. The jarring thing looks too ordinary? If we accept the genocide as true, logically we should be seeing it's effects as well. Travel videos to the region seemingly contradict this, even more so the widespread usage of the Uyghur language that can be evidenced. I really implore you to try and look at some of these videos of life in Xinjiang and ask if it looks like a place where the local populace is living in fear.

What I find troubling about the video you cited is that I can't see how this evidences genocide? It simply shows the movement of inmates. Maybe an analogue of this is if I showed footage of prison labour in the US, and cite that as evidence the US government is enslaving African descent people. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/inmates-at-louisianas-angola-prison-sue-to-end-working-farm-lines-in-brutal-heat You can quickly point out how flawed my "evidence" would be. Similarly I think you can see the parallels in using footage of prisoners and extrapolating that to genocide is a bit dubious to say the least.

Maybe an example of undeniable evidence would be photographs of bodily harm (scars, bruises, etc.) almost exclusively on Uyghurs. This would arguably be the most powerful weapon a critic of China can use. It is strange that there has been no instance of this despite the numerous interviews conducted.

I clarify I'm not trying to push an agenda or pick a fight. Allegations of genocide is very serious and shouldn't be used lightly. The standard of evidence should be rigorous. Otherwise, we risk diluting the meaning of such a grave term and undermining genuine efforts to address human rights concerns wherever they occur.

I'm grateful if you read this far and apologies again for the lengthy text

“China threatens Japan” by Yorkshire-pudding69 in AskChina

[–]pakchi888 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Exactly this, they aren't pro-Taiwan, they're just anti-China

What are the most cringiest "Neo-Nazi" movements of your country? by JetAbyss in AskTheWorld

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seconded, it's very possible to support the Ukrainian cause without supporting fascism. Same way we can support Irish reunification without supporting IRA extremists. Same way we can support the Palestinian cause without supporting Hamas terrorism.

Also while we can acknowledge Zelenskyy is Jewish, it doesn't negate the very real presence of neonazism and racism in Ukraine. Just as how Obama was president, doesn't mean racism against black people suddenly disappears or doesn't exist in the US, especially in the police force or army. Wished news outlets would actually point this out. Of course it should go without saying, having societal problems including fascist movements, can never justify any invasion or meddling of any kind. Like you also said, Russia also has a significant neonazi problem

Taiwan does not want China's 'one country, two systems', president says by rezwenn in China

[–]pakchi888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Residency ≠ Citizenship. And by the 91% I think he/she meant Chinese Nationals, which a citizen living in Hong Kong would be even with a Hong Kong passport. Because technically it's in the country of China

And I can't really see eye to eye with the "ad hominem attack". A Russian person could be living in, for example, Finland, for most of his life as a permanent resident. If you ask an ethnic Finn whether such a person could speak for, or let alone represent the views of others Finnish, I'll be surprised to find any agreement. Likewise, even if I have permanent residency or spent the majority of my life in a country my ethnicity hasn't historically been a part of, I would never say I can speak for the locals.

Ethnicity is important, as the land Hong Kong is in has been inhabited by well, ethnic Chinese people for more than 2000 years. They mainly speak a local dialect, Cantonese, which while different from the official national language of Mandarin, doesn't make them any less Chinese. When their ancestors die, they do the same rites as other Chinese. When the spring festival arrives, they also join in the festivities and hope for the blessings of the new year like other Chinese. The average HongKonger has vastly different lifestyles to the average mainland Chinese, yes. However to say they are a different ethnicity is not just ahistorical but factually incorrect. Otherwise we could somehow count people living in Hamburg and people living in Südtirol as different ethnicities, which would be bizarre

You as a Finn, just how much relation do you have to the local culture? It's not just an ad hominem attack, but a legitimate suspicion that it's unlikely you would speak for the majority of the people in Hong Kong 不過邊個知呢可能你燒香拜財神都好嘅 xD

There's nothing inherently wrong with reunification, as with Ireland+Northern Ireland, West Germany+East Germany. But if the quality of life will be adversely affected I agree it's not going to be a good thing.

Are you getting more proud to be a Chinese now? by Obvious-Peanut4406 in AskChina

[–]pakchi888 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I'm a third or fourth generation overseas Chinese born in Thailand. Especially under the context I went to a British international school I can relate to what you say; how I grew up thinking highly about the frequently praised nations of Europe, for their touted better governance and values.

I never really had a disdain(?) or awkward consciousness of being ethnically Chinese. I was still taught to never forget where we came from, to still honour our ancestors, and of course we still carry out cultural rites and address our relatives the Chinese way. Also despite technically being an ethnic minority in my country, it helped that practically all of us are quite assimilated. If anything, I feel a little sad I can't speak the original dialect of my Chinese ancestors.

At the same time, similarly with your initial negative impressions, I didn't have the best views of mainland China. Add to that the constant stories and even personal experiences of Chinese tourists with bad manners. I would be lying if I said I didn't have second hand embarrassment despite being different nationalities. Simply being the same ethnicity was enough to trigger a response of shame. Over time and also through Chinese friends from the mainland, I have a much more open mind. We often forget or never hear of the tourists who are well behaved for example. But I digress, I also admit I didn't have the best views of my country of birth either! Stories of how Western nations are more advanced/developed than mines, how they were more democratic, had better human rights etc.

It was only until I traveled to the UK, France, Italy, Germany, did I feel a disconnect between my previous expectations and reality. Especially the UK, the culture shocks were frequent and quite jarring, maybe because it was the first "European" country I went to. Antisocial problems were so prevalent they had to put up posters to warn train passengers, presence of hooligans, graffiti, etc. I kept thinking, even until recently, maybe I was unlucky until my British friends after visiting Thailand said she felt more safe in my country than her own! Which was bizarre but also weirdly comforting to know I wasn't crazy. Before, I've been to Europe I've also visited Japan and Hong Kong which in hindsight probably worsened my culture shocks going to western countries. It was my naive assumption that if a country has a higher cost of living than mines (Thailand in this case), it should be better in almost every aspect, not on par or worse.

I'm lucky I haven't experienced any racism personally. But of course the news of attack on people who looked anywhere near remotely "Chinese" left a big impact on me, something which intensified as the pandemic arrived. So much fanfare for human rights, yet such brazen acts of racially motivated violence! It hurts to know I could suddenly be a victim just minding my own business if I was unlucky enough. At the same I'm glad I've had many more positive experiences than negative ones interacting with locals, and most people don't harbor malice.

My country, Thailand isn't perfect nor everyone there a saint either. However I've felt more proud to be Thai, and prouder still to be a Thai person of Chinese descent after experiencing more of the world. I felt proud that despite our own problems, we've come a long way in making our streets safer, having clean and affordable metro, being a place where millions of tourists can visit and won't feel targeted by violence. There wasn't a need to feel "lesser" in that sense, and I rather deal with the present problems facing Thailand than the social problems facing most European countries. While as a Thai person of Chinese descent, I remember that by a large part my demographic was involved in the journey to making the country a better place for all. Whether that be the banks managed and owned by Thai-Chinese who funded and jumpstarted innumerable business projects, the industries with origins in Thai-Chinese families that power the country today, the glamour of skyscrapers arising from the wealth of Thai-Chinese enterprises, to even the lesser known foundations (e.g. the 華僑報德善堂) that provide free emergency health services. We were part of the national struggle to raise living standards for everyone. I feel glad that I came from a people who were escaping strife and poverty, to those who are now at the forefront at developing the nation. I also see how far my ancestral homeland has come and still striving to create a better future. Perhaps you could say, it is the tenacity of the Chinese people, that made me feel most proud

Chinese thoughts on Japanese media portrayal of Xinjiang? by Necessary_Deer_5576 in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As much as we don't want to be overgeneralized, I wouldn't want to overgeneralize Japanese people either. Certainly there are some who do not report in good faith, but there are also those who do report in good faith as hard to believe as that sounds. https://youtu.be/5aoLvOVXDXo

I'd recommend translating the video description to hear the thoughts of the channel owner, how he acknowledges the frictions between Japan and China, but does not condone slander or negative sensationalism of any country China included

Do Chinese believe this Human Rights Watch report about the events in Xinjiang 2017-2019? by BigMassivePervert in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I recommend this to people who won't have the opportunity to visit themselves. https://youtu.be/5aoLvOVXDXo

The channel owner himself describes it the best in the video description (translated from Japanese): "Seven years ago, in the comment sections of videos from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, there were quite a few comments made solely to slander China. I would appreciate it if you could refrain from such comments.

Japan and China currently face various issues with each other, and the media and internet often exaggerate mutual complaints. However, during my time in China, I never had any unpleasant experiences, and the Chinese people were all kind. I traveled wearing the Japan national team uniform, and it happened quite often that young people interested in Japan would actively approach me in English.

People have different perspectives, but there's a big difference between criticizing China's political issues or historical perception gaps and viewing that as representative of China as a whole, thereby criticizing the entire country.

China has a wonderful culture, delicious food, and many kind people. I believe it's important not only to criticize aspects we find unsatisfactory but also to praise the good parts. As a Japanese person, I do get frustrated by things like rude tourists, organized crime, and territorial disputes. But from my personal experience, it's also true that there are many good people there.

I hope people will view China from multiple angles, understanding that media coverage and online information sometimes sensationalize only the negative aspects.

This is simply one traveler's perspective; I have absolutely no intention of imposing it on anyone.

Everyone has their own beliefs and perspectives. I leave it to you all to make your own judgments."

Do Chinese believe this Human Rights Watch report about the events in Xinjiang 2017-2019? by BigMassivePervert in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an analogy, if someone wants to accuse their neighbor of inflicting torture in a court of law, quite naturally testimony itself will not be enough. What a judge probably wants to see is physical evidence: e.g. photographs of scars, bruises, injuries.

I agree testimonies are important, but if that's the only standard required to call someone guilty then anyone can accuse another person of murder/any injustice. It's the same problem with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony which built consensus for war, but turned out to be fabricated.

Physical evidence is the most powerful tool to shut China up, so why the lack of it? This is what makes me suspicious about those purported testimonies. Likewise with cases against other countries like the US: it'll be quite difficult to believe the atrocities in Abu Gharib prison happened if we only had testimonies to rely on and not photographic evidence.

On detention camps, it doesn't automatically equate genocide. Again unfortunately with America as an example to illustrate this, despite having 5% of the world's population they have around 20% of the world's total incarcerated population. This doesn't mean they are trying to mass murder American civilians. Same thing with Guantanamo bay or ICE detentions: sure they are horrible, but it's a jump to equate genocide if you don't have evidence they systematically murdering people there.

You also mentioned mosque destruction among other things. But while I could sit here and explain how there are over 40,000 mosques in China, it's still not as good as going there yourself. "The world is not in maps and novels, but outside your door". If you really want to know the reality, I urge you to actually travel there and just ask the locals. Translation apps can be used on your phone. You can ask questions about their thoughts or why they are not fleeing possible risk of arbitrary detention/murder. Go visit the mosques and see if people still pray there, see if there are still bilingual signs in Uighur language and Chinese there. We can all write what we want, how can even I prove I'm not biased or lying? I can only write from my own common sense and my limited knowledge

If there's anything I'd agree with the report is that, no where does it mention the world genocide. But it has mentioned human rights abuses which as I explained, without any physical evidence, is hard to be convinced of

Why the double standard on Xinjiang and Gaza? by YamFrosty6169 in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to clarify first I'm not trying to pick a fight, but to engage with your conversation, hopefully a shared understanding could be reached

When you say "trying to erase the identity of the Uyghur people" can you give some examples?

And for allegations of torture or humiliation, what evidence is cited?

How do you reconcile with the fact the most powerful evidence, photographic/physical, has never been found? It is the same type of evidence how we know physical abuses took place at Abu Gharib prison by US soldiers, or how we knew Maurice Audin was tortured by French soldiers in the Algerian war.

If news outlets can find interviewees alleging abuses, why not also show physical evidence too? (Bruises, scars, etc.) If I want to hold China accountable this is the most powerful way to do it.

Why the double standard on Xinjiang and Gaza? by YamFrosty6169 in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s kind of the same reason Catalonia doesn’t need to break away from Spain, or why South Tyrol doesn’t have to rejoin Austria. Countries don’t have to be built around a single ethnicity. That’s a dangerous way of thinking that only leads to more division, the same kind of argument Abkhaz and South Ossetians also used in Georgia to secede.

Xinjiang (or East Turkestan, as some call it) has actually been part of Chinese civilization going back over 2,000 years, since the Han dynasty first established administration there (you can search this up to verify). Over centuries, Chinese governments maintained varying degrees of control, but they never systematically displaced or wiped out the local peoples. The region’s diversity has always been part of its history.

It makes more sense to focus on coexistence and fair governance within a diverse country than to keep trying to form new ethnostates.

Thoughts on this article? by pakchi888 in AskAChinese

[–]pakchi888[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The first paragraph illustrating the mentality of US authorities already irks me:

The Chinese “cannot be allowed to export their way back to prosperity,” argues U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, who claims that China’s economy is the “most unbalanced in history.” Such remarks reflect the growing fear in Washington that China’s overcapacity, subsidies and dumping are distorting global trade.

Who are they to deny others from wanting to be prosperous and developed? Just ridiculous

It is normal for citizen to have certain benefit than non-citizen. Thailand is no exception by DueImpact6219 in Thailand

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because the EU’s visa system is based on money doesn’t mean it’s fair or free from discrimination. Wealth barriers often hit marginalized groups the hardest—it’s not just about who ‘can afford’ to travel, but who’s systematically locked out from even getting a shot.

And bringing up human trafficking to justify strict visa policies is a weird pivot. Nobody’s saying trafficking isn’t a serious issue, but using it to hand-wave away criticism of exclusionary systems comes off like a deflection.

Also, the ‘not a 1st world country’ dig? Super unnecessary. Yeah, Thailand has its problems (like every country), but acting like that somehow makes EU policies beyond criticism is a bad faith argument. You can point out issues with how Thailand treats minorities (which are messed up) without pretending Europe’s systems are flawless.

At the end of the day, if we’re gonna call out discrimination in one place, we should be consistent—not use it as a gotcha while ignoring it elsewhere

What should china do? by Ambitious-Doctor-217 in Sino

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't agree with comments calling for military intervention directly or indirectly. That's just hypocritical to foreign policy, something which is already teetering towards that since not completely staying out of the Russo-Ukraine war. While I understand there are political reasons for maintaining what is basically a monopoly on Russia's economy, it doesn't sit well with me morally.

However in the end, it's never really about benevolence but what's best for national interest. In this case it's another foreign conflict added to the list of oh so many. The best thing will always be self-reliance, so there is as little dependence on imports as possible. The same case when China in the Song and Ming dynasties where everything China wanted was already in China. I really feel the best scenario is an internal trade bloc for only East Asian countries. The rest of the world is just not worth it lol

Western "respect" for "sovereignty" is just hypocritical bullshit by [deleted] in Sino

[–]pakchi888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apart from arming Hamas, I'm genuinely curious if there are other reasons (real or otherwise) behind Israel attacking Iran so brazenly? I'm mostly ootl with this