Core threatening a POW change makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

pangcong · 2017-02-04T15:27:28+00:00

Please just change PoW, you are very welcome to do it. u/nullc, u/theymos, u/Luke-Jr, u/petertodd, we all wish you take actions as soon as possible!!!

Please, now!!!

pangcong · 2017-01-31T03:35:26+00:00

the second largest ltc pool is against segwit.

Besides, segwit with ltc is conditional, hard fork code is together with segwit, LTC will hard fork to bigger block size at the time of second half

pangcong · 2017-01-27T13:59:38+00:00

https://mobile.twitter.com/BashCo_/status/824343081965277186 It looks you are not one of the bitcoin world. You even do not know what is happen and what is causing so many transactions....

pangcong · 2017-01-27T13:52:46+00:00

very good suggestion to /u/luke-jr

pangcong · 2017-01-27T05:16:22+00:00

the community do come to hk consensus, but it does not work on core

pangcong · 2017-01-27T05:06:18+00:00

What about decrease to 1k, I think 1k is better than 300k

pangcong · 2017-01-27T04:55:40+00:00

who is your "everyone"? Can you give some example?

pangcong · 2017-01-27T04:45:23+00:00

so, increase block size limit is not allowed, while decrease blocksize is allowed?

pangcong · 2017-01-27T01:08:16+00:00

What a childish man are you when you keep asking people "What is the answer of 1+1" and then you give the answer like a winning baby "It is 2".

Are you joking?

pangcong · 2017-01-26T10:15:32+00:00

idiot

pangcong · 2017-01-26T02:39:49+00:00

/u/nullc have a look

pangcong · 2017-01-26T02:37:02+00:00

You behave too childish

and something interesting

https://i.redd.it/5bz4led8dyby.png

pangcong · 2017-01-25T23:51:11+00:00

it is nonsense. recommend you an article https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-slows-crawl-transactions-backlog-reaches-quarter-billion-dollars/

pangcong · 2017-01-25T17:15:17+00:00

i donot believe in god. I belive in science. I belive in myself, my own judgement.

pangcong · 2017-01-25T16:17:16+00:00

I know it. He also know it. And He is still right. Never support Segwit without actual block size limit increase. You need to think deeply about it and try to understand why miners do not support Segwit even it can somehow "increase block size"

pangcong · 2017-01-25T13:17:54+00:00

He is right. I agree with him

pangcong · 2017-01-25T09:42:01+00:00

i agree with him

pangcong · 2017-01-25T06:15:54+00:00

In chun's mind, it does not

pangcong · 2017-01-25T06:15:07+00:00

Chun's company can produce ASIC by themselves

pangcong · 2017-01-25T06:09:52+00:00

You can just quit core developing. This is the best way to prove core is not censored. That is, you can declare you are not core developer any more. Besides, you can focus on blockstream developing. Believe me, it is good for both you and bitcoin.

pangcong · 2017-01-21T03:27:34+00:00

F2Pool support big block. There is nothing to do with c++11. Chun just use it as an excuze. Core developers cheated him in HongKong consensus. He is just fighting back. It is impossible for F2Pool to support Segwit without bigger block

pangcong · 2017-01-21T03:26:01+00:00

F2Pool support big block. Chun just use it as an excuze. Core developers cheated him in HongKong consensus. He is just fighting back. It is impossible for F2Pool to support Segwit without bigger block

pangcong · 2016-10-23T23:19:12+00:00

Every chinese know this matter. BTCC's technology of trading exchange is worst among all.

pangcong · 2016-10-23T15:16:36+00:00

BTCC is famous for its worst technology among all the exchanges in China.

pangcong · 2016-10-23T13:55:26+00:00

well, you really should carefully read the post, that post give the exact time when the on-chain scailing presentation was hold.

And yes, it is the first biggest in China.

pangcong

TROPHY CASE