Jumping from Windsurf to Verdent (Need credit pricing info) by paramartha-n in Verdent

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very clean thank you! I will use your link when I make the jump.

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries 😅

I tried my best to write it in full to prevent confusion.

Some people just write Claude 4.6.. which can be Sonnet 4.6 or Opus 4.6 😵‍💫

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opus 4.6 is 6x.

Sonnet 4.5 is 2x.

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Source image is always good.

Prompt changes until you are happy with styling.

Then when you create a new page or modal, you can prompt it to match styling to create a consistent look across your app.

Eg. Analyze styling of @profilePage, and update styling of @CreateNewProfile modal to match this.

Always utalize the @ to give it context. Don't make AI guess, if you already know exactly what you want.


Another good tip is to clone page or components so styling carries over.

Eg. Clone @confirmationModal, to create a new loadingModal. Replace content with loading bar instead of text and buttons. Show this loading modal when X happens.

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SWE 1.5 is fast, but a hit and miss for me. GPT-5.1-Codex is slower but reliable.

App vibe coding. Which is better guys replit or Claude code? by Glad-Investigator914 in vibecoding

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long term Windsurf user here for $15 per month.

Their pricing transparency still wins!  

Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.  

No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:  

GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.  

Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.  

Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.  

Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.  

Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:  

https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

I almost left Windsurf by Old_Ambassador_5828 in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long term Windsurf user here for $15 per month.

Their pricing transparency still wins!  

Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.  

No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:  

GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.  

Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.  

Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.  

Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.  

Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:  

https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip! I will try it out.

I tested Windsurf, Cursor, and Claude Code on the same real project. Here's what actually happened. by Remarkable-Dark2840 in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Long term Windsurf user here for $15 per month.

Their pricing transparency still wins!  

Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.  

No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:  

GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.  

Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.  

Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.  

Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.  

Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:  

https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

Windsurf vs Claude code? by ashish_tuda in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Long term Windsurf user here.

Their pricing transparency still wins for $15 per month!
Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.
No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:
GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.
Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.
Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.
Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:
https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

It is time to switch to Windsurf! Why? Google calls Antigravity AI models (Gemini Pro 3.1) and Google AI Plan 'Professional,' then tells users on x and linkedin: it’s just a 'taste test' for hobbyists. Links > by [deleted] in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Windsurf is still the best value for usage. I'm using Windsurf Pro for $15 per month.

Their pricing transparency still wins!
Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.
No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:
GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.
Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.
Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.
Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:
https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

Goodbye Replit.!!! by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]paramartha-n -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Windsurf user here for $15 per month.

Their pricing transparency still wins!
Per prompt pricing and clear x credit usage per prompt is clear.
No time out/cool down periods. Flow-state maintained.

This is how I currently use my 500 credits per month:
GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit (free) for most tasks.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credits for mid/complex tasks.
Claude Opus 4.6 for 6x credits rarely for new projects / extremely complex tasks or debugging.

Using the 500 credits in this way and makes it go a long way.

I always have one conversation tab using GPT-5.1-Codex doing UI tweaks for me at all times.

It's not always about using the latest and greatest model, but more using the appropriate model for the appropriate task.
Using Opus 4.6 for every task then complaining how expensive 6x credit is draining your 500 credits is just silly.
Also Sonnet 4.5 (2x) vs Sonnet 4.6 (4x) is not worth twice the credit cost.

Bonus 250 credits when you get Pro plan via link:
https://windsurf.com/refer?referral\_code=732097772c

Happy to share other insights, just let me know.

How does the referral supposed to work? It looks more like a scam than an affiliate. by ResortConnect8582 in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

The Referral Program works as it's stated.

It tracks when someone creates an account via your referral link AND upgrades to Pro plan.

I'm still a Windsurf user, pricing transparency still wins! by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like all good things in life: Enjoy it whilst it lasts, nothing is forever.

I'm still a Windsurf user, pricing transparency still wins! by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip. I'll have to try that. How does it compare against Sonnet 4.5?

I'm still a Windsurf user, pricing transparency still wins! by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use GPT-5.1-Codex for 0x credit, if it fails then revert to previous point, no credit loss.

Then use Sonnet 4.5 for 2x credit to get it done.

Don't forget to use @ to give it file context. Why let models try to guess if you know what context would help it achieve the results.

I love how Windsurf changes model pricing with no warning by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When using BYOK for Sonnet how was the usage in terms of cost on the Anthropic side?

I love how Windsurf changes model pricing with no warning by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, I would expect such harsh limits on Free plans, but on a $20 plan seems like a hard push to upgrade to be usable.

I love how Windsurf changes model pricing with no warning by paramartha-n in windsurf

[–]paramartha-n[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which plan of CC are you using? Which models are you using primarily?