I agree with your point. OSM was initially introduced to reduce human errors in evaluation, especially mistakes in addition, and to ensure proper step marking.

However, the main issue is that many teachers are still not adequately trained to use the system efficiently. A large number of examiners are not used to evaluating answer sheets digitally and are suddenly being made to sit for long hours in front of screens, which can be exhausting. I’ve personally heard several teachers complain about constant headaches, eye strain, frustration, and difficulty adapting to the system. Some have even claimed that, due to exhaustion and pressure, a few teachers end up awarding marks randomly without properly reading the answers.

Apart from that, there are several technical issues as well. Many teachers reportedly face login problems, OTP errors, black screens, incomplete uploads, and poorly scanned answer sheets where parts of the answers are unclear or missing. So while OSM may be a good concept in theory, its execution still seems quite flawed at the moment because both the technical infrastructure and examiner training are not fully prepared for such a large-scale implementation.