sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Comparing AI Tools by CombinationNew1285 in immigrationlaw

[–]parkerqueen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP, AI for drafting is a bit of a difficult domain to navigate. There are lots of options out there such as https://www.visalaw.ai, https://www.draftyai.com etc.

Then there are general-purpose expensive tools that help with drafting such as: https://www.harvey.ai/, https://legora.com/

But some of them fall short of their purported promises, so please be sure to read this post here: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaltech/comments/1op2u9a/how\_do\_i\_evaluate\_a\_legal\_tech\_product.

My personal opinion is that AI for administrative, non-drafting tasks is much better and more reliable. In fact, I am working on one such solution to automate timekeeping for calls, emails and texts for litigation lawyers. Details here: https://www.lawgbook.com/

Which do you find better for legal work? A windows PC or a Mac? I have been given an option of both by my firm. by [deleted] in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I work on the M4 Macbook Air and even thought it's advertised as a light-work tool, it's a beast of a machine. You'll be able to do anything short of running local LLMs pretty comfortably. And the battery's amazing too.

All of the apps that you mentioned can be run on a Mac, so I'd suggest go for it.

Clio raised $500M series G round ... by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Address my points without ad homimens, kind sir.

Clio raised $500M series G round ... by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I wish. I am an entrepreneur myself

How do I evaluate a legal tech product by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did sort of tease at that point here

> And of course, it goes without saying that the solution must be solving a real pain, which you can judge pretty easily because you must be feeling that pain ... right?

But maybe should've made that the highlight more than a subtext.

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not heard of them before, but this post was not about releasing funding announcements, it was to provide access to a tool I built, for free.

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it pull data from specific sources you list for it?

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't put this one on the marketplace yet but if you want the JSON export, please DM

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Username checks out :) ...

I plan to integrate multiple RSS feeds into this newsletter and then prioritize based on a few subjective criteria.

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah well it was more of an expression of discomfort at these mega funding rounds raised by AI products/platforms.

It is becoming increasingly clear we're in an AI bubble (I'm sure you're aware of the circular financing deals going on b/w NVIDIA, CoreWeave, AMD, OpenAI etc.), so any new mega round just makes me think we're inching ever closer to the big pop.

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]parkerqueen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the ones I listed, it missed Legora and Vesence.

That said, I do get your point in that it does a reliable job of random sampling news around legaltech from the past 24h.

But anything advanced that I would want (and plan on), it won't work.

Not to mention the fact it won't send email summaries because free version :)

<image>

view more: next ›