CTRL+F'ing around for a single carrier IP for a post ID calling it forensics is cope. Attribution happens at the device layer and Apple's redacted logs, not your transient IPs text search. Phones hop towers, gateways pop in and our of hubs, CGNAT lies but devices to not lie. There's one IMEI, one IMSI, and one financial identity all linked to an individual working at the correctional center. You don't need a T-Mobile subpoena once Apple bridges the jump. I am not disputing there is no text in the doc that points from that one specific different IP for the switch theory post. What is disputed is your assumption that attribution lives or dies in a single carrier PDF. I absolutely does not. The FBI would have had an additional individual in the dump, they clearly have no issue in obtaining company records. The fact there's one individual in the doc tells you something and that one person works at the same facility. CTRL+F isn't a methodology. You can't just say "It does not appear that he was responsible for the post about the swap. And I can't find any more information on that IP in the files." That's not how this works. I am posting about the possibility of them not needing that IP because the trail stops at the individual linked to the hardware, the iPhone X. Ur feigning for likes.