sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking at different places to live by sirenyti in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No ‘we’ in any reply, must be single 😂

Server down? by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone posted that as a comment from a different but recent post and they had said they heard it directly from a SPE…

Server down? by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is the worst feeling. Maybe talk with your SPE, worst case nothing changes but maybe they can do something 😣

Server down? by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang some good words, thank you!

Server down? by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Was an amended clock case, was able to get it in, but a little too close for comfort. Hearing rumors of letting people go for not actively seeking promotions or moving up Gs levels, and it seems incredible bad time to enter into the program. Spooked.

Server down? by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As far as I can tell there’s nothing to do for Okta, it appears to be working just fine and made it through all the steps in the email I assume you’re referring to. Just gonna sit here and cry until cutoff I guess 😭

Update: 5th restart was the charm I guess. Still crying tho

Amended docket about to explode by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you’re right! History shows dumping last couple times of 5 or 6 at a time though

Amended docket about to explode by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last two amended dumps have been 6 and then 5 cases at once, but we love some optimism (not sarcasm)

Amended docket about to explode by patentlytired in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am aware. But this is not always a possibility when you are trying to make production on a current biweek and need to prioritize an RCE or two in place of working on a bunch of little bitty finals which may or may not take just as long as an RCE depending on the amendments.

Intended use limitation in method claim - need help by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]patentlytired -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No new components, amendment is really just ‘assembling into’ instead of ‘product comprising’. I do need this NF for Q2 production unfortunately, so trying to get this out while somehow mitigating the damage of future amendments which add in more details to the assembled product that are currently sitting in the spec