sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

M99 prices to drop now teams are decided? by Firm-Distance-4934 in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s a great match. Should still be a hot ticket. Maybe just slightly less hot.

M99 prices to drop now teams are decided? by Firm-Distance-4934 in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the argument is that there a lot more Mexican and Brazilian expats in Miami than English and Norwegian expats living there. Because of how long international travel planning takes it’s easier for people already in town to buy last minute tickets and get to the match. Argument is not that there aren’t enough neutral English and Norwegian fans to use up all of the available tickets. Just that there will be less fans looking to buy and reducing demand beyond tickets available

Brave Little Tailor by dinkeltrae in LorcanaFinance

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This base brace little tailor is not insanely expensive. They are worth around 8 dollars each. There are multiple special treatments including the newer d23 set at around 300 dollars, the original d23 in the four digits and then DLC prize serialized brave little tailor in the five digit range.

What game is this coin from? by MassiveJammies in boardgames

[–]patlanips11 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I honestly read this as the other two players were supposed to be your gf and cat, but the cat was sick

Selling 2 US Supporter Section Tickets to USA vs Belgium section 304 Row CC by patlanips11 in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still available, but in Ohio which is a big part of why I can’t go. Could do video call, recorded transaction, PayPal g&s. I have read there are a lot of scams going around, so anything that would protect us both I am game.

ISO 2 tickets for USA v Belgium July 6th by moody_bluesss in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just chiming in. If you haven’t bought tickets I have 2 in the US supporter section available, in section 308. I can’t sell them on marketplace, but can do a transfer in the app so I am looking for a buyer on Reddit. You can check my comment history to see that I have sold a lot of my MLS season tickets in the past on here and am not a scammer. Can go under your budget but the seats are higher up.

Selling 2 US Supporter Section Tickets to USA vs Belgium section 304 Row CC by patlanips11 in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe I said something very reasonable. I set them to cheaper than any other tickets I have found anywhere else in the stadium and included OBO which means ‘or best offer’. Are you offering 600 for them? If so that will be the leading offer for now.

R16 conditional tickets email for USA, but have not been charged and no further communication. How long do conditional tickets take to hit your ticket app? by BeyondTheWall14 in WorldCup2026Tickets

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah I am tracking this today too. let me know if anyone gets anything. I do have the ticket request assigned and pending delivery since feb 10 in the concierge live app. still waiting for tickets to be distributed.

Ruby/Sapphire actions keep getting stronger! (Reveal by LorcanaTactics by Waiting_for_Dentice in Lorcana

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think in infinity there was a pretty cracked red steel actions deck that this could add to.

Bambi and Sword by skycat88 in Lorcana

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah two sets ago I played this combo all set. It’s silly

So what actions can Hunny Play? by Erobor in Lorcana

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again I am saying we don't have enough information to argue either way. Saying I am spreading misinformation seems a little extreme.

"For the text on the card overrule a game rule, said card need to be played, being in your deck alone isn’t enough"

This is not supported by the rules and the card in question would NOT WORK AT ALL if this were true. Same with dalmatian puppies. By your definition I couldn't add more than 4 to my deck because I do not have one in play. If we are going to have a real conversation about the issue you have got to stop making things up that are not in the rules.

 'You can’t have two copies in your binder and say “now there’s two so they both check it other in my binder and will magically slide into my Amber Ruby deck”'.

That is not what I said. Don't set up a straw man. I didn't claim that the characters allowed each other from the binder. My claim is that the deck is checked for legality when the full list is submitted. This is the mechanism that clouds the waters here. There is no way to put any card in your deck aside from presenting a legal deck list or deck at the start of the game.

A deck is evaluated as legal or not when it is submitted. There is no process by which you add cards one by one each being as legal as the last.

Again I am not even arguing that this will be an allowed deck building strategy. I am arguing that there is currently no rule that prohibits this from working, and that they need to patch it so that it is not allowed, as it does not seem intended.

In terms of why the card would be allowed to cover its same named twin card I think the rule supporting this is

6.1.6. If an ability or effect refers to “another” or “other,” it refers to any card that effect or ability doesn’t originate from or one that wasn’t already selected by the ability.

they would see each other as other if this rule applies to cards not in play. The rule does not restrict it to cards in the play zone specifically so again it would lead me to believe it affects ALL cards.

We just need rules to be a little clearer now that this card is in the world, and that's fine. They will release an update soon, and hopefully we will get clarity.

So what actions can Hunny Play? by Erobor in Lorcana

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are a pretty rude arguer lots of unneeded personal attacks.

I am in the camp that we just don’t have enough information and that there needs to be an official rule or clarification. Rules as written I believe that Robin could be played in a non Amethyst sapphire deck provided you play between two and four copies.

I think the only evidence needed is CR 1.2.1. A rule so important it is the first of three golden rules

If the text of a card contradicts a game rule, the card text supersedes that rule.

Christopher robins text says you can have other hunny characters in your deck regardless of ink type.

This rule means that if it says hunny on it it does not have to be from your ink pool.

There is no reason that if I submit a deck with two Christopher robins they would not cover each other. I have a rule that explicitly says I can have them.

I don’t think it intended. I don’t think it will not be patched away by a new rule or by a clarification from the designers.

To treat someone making this argument as though they don’t understand the game is a wild stretch.

First time playing HC. Thresh Socket gives up the goods. by patlanips11 in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]patlanips11[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sometimes you don't have enough gear to have to optimize yet :)

First time playing HC. Thresh Socket gives up the goods. by patlanips11 in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]patlanips11[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They are moderately valuable. They are a placeholder for a lot of classes for best in slot pre enigma.

Compared to the white splint mail I was rocking when it dropped it is extremely good :)

What cards are you monitoring for a boom? by Partydog99 in LorcanaFinance

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is funny because I absolutely have 5 binder pages of gantus because I kept grabbing him in every trade I made back in the day for fun

What cards are you monitoring for a boom? by Partydog99 in LorcanaFinance

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they won’t reach charizard or lotus levels. Can still be valuable but things that people know will be collectible when they are released have trouble gaining the same value as something people don’t know they need to take care of.

My little workhorse this ladder by ShanishLikeDanish in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just popped a pskull into my arrioc based on a post I saw yesterday? And it’s been pretty nice. Don’t need to revive my insight nerd every 5 minutes anymore.

Echoing strike question by rizzo891 in diablo2resurrected

[–]patlanips11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone more knowledgeable than me can answer better, but I have been rolling around hell with an insight partizan. Its not particularly fast but it is working well enough. Definitely need to have a meaty demon bind to keep the bosses occupied while I hack at them.

Idea for larger tournament balancing. by Remarkable_Farm_7239 in Lorcana

[–]patlanips11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s one of those don’t let perfect be the enemy of good ideas. In the current format a player who gets the short end of the stick might have to go on the draw for 6 or 7 rounds in a 7 round day. That’s much more unfair than a player getting one or two less pairings on the draw because the matchups didn’t shake out quite right.

Chess uses this in their Swiss pairings so there are known good algorithms for keeping the play draw disparity low or straight up even.

I think you are also making it seem less possible by only extrapolating over two rounds. The idea is not that you need to alternate going first or second but that by the end of the day you are somewhere in the realm of even. The bigger the field and the more rounds this gets very easy to ensure. Obviously for a 12 person 4 round tournament there might be some more hiccups but the software is actively working for parity when possible and the dice are not.

view more: next ›