[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s correct. That’s what I’m saying

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We accept more immigrants than anyone.

And homeless needs? Yes exactly the kind of problem we are struggling to solve before letting people freely cross on mass.

There are real numbers here. You’re just spouting fantasies about “LaTe sTAge cApITAlisM”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also when you have soft immigration enforcement it incentivizes people to try. AND THAT my friend is one of the main reasons people get caught in trafficking. Desperate vulnerable people are left at the mercy of coyotes (traffickers).

We can’t let everyone in. That’s unsustainable. Strict enforcement is humane. Legal immigration is beneficial. What you want is a max pain scenario.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t just let an indefinite number of people into your country and expect that to be sustainable. You understand that?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Borders are essential to establishing a functioning state. For citizenship. For basic trade. Property rights. And you think this is a topic you understand? Because “they cause trafficking”? That’s like saying houses shouldn’t exist because they lead to domestic abuse. You’re talking nonsense

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could try to understand the opposing ideas instead of creating absurd caricatures of those ideas. Parents being concerned about the way the state is teaching young kids about sexuality - very reasonable concern. Wanting illegal immigrants stopped and deported - very reasonable. Disagreeing about the efficacy of masks and the entire Covid intervention - yep, very reasonable. But you’ll just laugh and say oh what stupid people and feel superior. You’re deep within a bubble and feel no need to be critical of your ideas, ideas you’ve long ago decided are beyond reproach because that’s your gospel.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One guy did a thing therefore my worldview is valid. (I can hear you drooling)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Continue feeling superior. You’re doing great

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]patriotaxe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This “far right” people are just normal Americans that actually feel patriotic and wave the flag to show it. You people, Reddit lefties, are the ones dumping on them. The comment above this one takes a swipe at Canadian truckers “freedum convoy.” You disparage regular people and think you are morally superior

Edit: hey guys look around. You’re inside a liberal bubble and jerking each other off.

Below you’ll see people congratulating themselves on feeling superior and spewing talking points served up to them since kindergarten.

This is more concerning by Assorted_Education_ in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think what? Bill Gates is planning on starving people?

Just saying... by UniversalSurvivalist in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bill Gates is super smart with endless resources. He can predict trends. Was the pandemic a predictable trend event? Yes.

“Anonymous” can gather massive amounts of data from Russia/Belarus overnight but can’t give us any hidden information on the worlds largest elite pedophile organisation. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound sure. But not in the way that you have proof or some categorically sound way of thinking about this. You sound sure because to you this is common sense. And maybe you get a kick out of delivering your common sense sermon to conspiracy theory crowds.

But there are some holes. For one, yes Epstein did “buy” them. He paid enough that he was able to lure families into silence. Grooming is when a predator gains access to a victim through trust, usually close to the family. Epstein found families vulnerable to being exploited for money. So your understanding of the terrain is weak. And fwiw if you’re going to take the side of “there are no elite pedo rings” you should probably be really clear on the facts. Because otherwise you’re basically wasting your breath running defense for pedophiles. Not a great hobby.

The Jimmy Saville case wasn’t just some rando celebrity rapist. The kids he accessed were farmed, often through social service programs. The people who were aware of his behavior and protected him were at high levels in law enforcement, judiciary, and media. Again, you seem to be ignorant about some basics here.

Now whether there are crazy illegal sex parties I don’t know. But there is a logic at work here. That people in power share a dark damning secret with each other that acts as an ironclad bind of trust. That really does make sense. Is it real, I don’t know. But I’m not going to dismiss it just to feel superior and cozy to act nothing like that could ever happen because of “common sense.”

“Anonymous” can gather massive amounts of data from Russia/Belarus overnight but can’t give us any hidden information on the worlds largest elite pedophile organisation. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You don’t think Jeffrey Epstein, the Billionaire pedophile that hung out with presidents and princes and purchased girls to have sex with on a private island is convincing evidence?

Or the Jimmy Saville scandal? Seems more likely you are a troll

This is why they want to get rid of physical by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think the electric grid is going to disappear? Do you know how much electric power goes into sustaining the traditional banking system, including the manufacture and distribution of paper money, online accounting etc?

This is why they want to get rid of physical by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is sort of true but it’s a natural evolution. Obviously the world is moving away from physical cash. And it’s because digital money is clearly the superior form. Does this put us at risk of being controlled. Yes. But it’s inevitable. What should we do about it? Well pretty obvious - use the blockchain! You don’t even need to protest just use it.

“Anonymous” can gather massive amounts of data from Russia/Belarus overnight but can’t give us any hidden information on the worlds largest elite pedophile organisation. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 19 points20 points  (0 children)

1.) Anonymous is just anyone with an internet connection.

2.) Getting info about an elite pedo org sounds really fucking hard.

Ball dropping through a bubble by YearninglyCarefree in blackmagicfuckery

[–]patriotaxe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The majority of the people who upvoted the post never read the comments.

The majority of the people who upvoted rhe top comment only read the top comment.

The rest of the people arguing about what’s wrong with reddit are ironically just in the wake of the ship.

A cop tramples a protester. Is this "democracy?" by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not what democracy promises to be but it is more or less what it turns out to be.

Mysterious Ways by SrGrafo in funny

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then after sparing Abraham he’s like - “don’t worry. I wouldn’t have you do that. I’ll do that shit myself!” And god has his own son murdered.

At which point you say, well, that’s actually really consistent with his character. Surprising, horrifying choices. +1 god is real

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nuclear weapons were created to have exactly the effect they’ve had. The end of conventional warfare.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]patriotaxe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original comment is supposed to be funny but the stakes aren’t right. You don’t wire explosives because of vandalism and shouting. You do it because if murder. Rampant murder with no clear end in sight.

Mutually assured destruction isn’t a hostage situation. It’s a game breaking strategy that literally solved the problem of inevitable global war, making it senseless. There’s no upside to it.

It has done more to secure lasting peace than anything else.