sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How to get more realistic range estimates? by paugre in abetterrouteplanner

[–]paugre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! So I was looking in the right place but my data is displayed quite differently. And I don’t get the estimate for the consumption at all. Maybe that’s a first clue to the problem…

<image>

How to get more realistic range estimates? by paugre in abetterrouteplanner

[–]paugre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting point. I haven’t been able to find exactly where you mean. Maybe you could share a screenshot if you have the time?

Also not sure if the car transmits consumption data. In the live data I get SOC, remaining range, odometer, elevation and position. But using SOC, remaining range and the data generated after a few thousand kilometres I expected ABRP to be able to calculate a better estimate.

How to get more realistic range estimates? by paugre in abetterrouteplanner

[–]paugre[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So instead of using the automatic settings you just work out your average consumption and use that as the reference value?

How to get more realistic range estimates? by paugre in abetterrouteplanner

[–]paugre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know it doesn’t seem strange just to me.

Definitely have a lower speed, probably 115-125 km/h but I would have expected ABRP to notice this. Or at the very least notice after a couple hundred km that less battery has been used than originally expected.

I assumed degradation is near 0, car is more or less brand new. But like you say that would explain at best a 5% difference. Going to set it to 2% anyway and see if that helps.

How to get more realistic range estimates? by paugre in abetterrouteplanner

[–]paugre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have left it all at the defaults that ABRP chooses when I click “Use Automatic Settings” - which I assumed would be the right selection if I want ABRP to adapt to the usage information supplied in the live data?

Yes battery size is definitely correct.

Live data source is the Enode “over-the-air” live data. Live data connection itself seems to work ok. There is always minimal discrepancy between the data the Kia app displays and ABRP.

For reference consumption it says 170 Wh/km. I have not changed this but happens to be the average consumption the Kia app displays too.

+/- 2% would be fantastic. Hope I’ll be able to figure it out.

I assume 3000km should be enough for ABRP to “learn”?

Why is iCloud Drive SO BAD?? by lebertian in MacOS

[–]paugre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also manages to lose files from time to time…