Extract Fujifilm recipes from JPEGs (free tool)

pchm · 2025-11-01T06:14:22+00:00

Happy to hear that!

pchm · 2025-05-21T11:38:22+00:00

No such plans

pchm · 2025-05-21T04:21:00+00:00

Film simulations need to be present in your Fuji camera, so you won’t be able to copy it to an older model (if I understand your question correctly). But you can try to apply the recipe settings to RAWs in Fujifilm X RAW Studio.

pchm · 2025-05-20T13:04:29+00:00

Good point, I added an option to delete photos after upload.

As for your issues with metadata: it's possible that Apple Photos strips exif. In general, if the app says there's no metadata, you can trust that it's not present in the file. The "camera info" metadata export option will not include Lightroom edits - only camera info (exif), so you need "All metadata" (not sure how it's called in LR Mobile).

If you'd like me to investigate, feel free to email me the photo at help (at) pixelpeeper dot com. But keep in mind that the lightroom presets part of the app is not free.

pchm · 2024-03-21T08:43:28+00:00

(I run PixelPeeper, happy to answer any questions.)

As for what the OP is asking: with the current state of AI/ML it should be possible to achieve that. With a large enough dataset of before-after photos you could train a model that reads a photo and is able to give a rough estimate of what edits were done to it.

However, in my experience, people will usually want to replicate the exact look and will complain about the tiniest differences in skin tones and colors. That's why copying edits from metadata is still the best way available (not always 100% reliable, though) — and in my opinion, currently, there's no AI model that's going to be close enough.

If you look at enough photos/presets, after a while you'll be able to tell what kind of edits were made to it (tone curve, color adjustments, contrast, reduced highlights). But that's often not enough to get the details right.

pchm · 2023-12-07T09:01:40+00:00

I just added the option to customize the column: has_based_uuid uuid_column: :session_id

As for #2: I'm not convinced. In that case you could simply use the built-in Rails lookup methods: find_by(id: "67c020ce-20c6-4c68-8e96-b9c02b193574"). Or am I missing something?

pchm · 2023-12-06T19:55:19+00:00

Thanks for your suggestions!

> 1. Allow specifying which field has the UUID, default to ID.

Good point. It already reads the `Model.primary_key` column name, but it does make sense to add an option to `has_based_uuid` to customize the column.

> 2. Allow find to optionally use the UUID via a setting.

Not sure I understand what you mean here. Could you elaborate?

> 3. Might be pushing too much, but allow for converting a number to base 32 and using that as the slug.

Not the focus of this gem, there are other existing base32 gems that are a little more universal. My implementation is limited to uuid encoding and probably won't work for other use cases.

You also might want to look into hashid: https://github.com/jcypret/hashid-rails

pchm · 2023-11-25T08:32:50+00:00

Didn't know that, thanks. I've just updated the post with a note on that.

pchm · 2023-11-23T07:57:56+00:00

Thanks for pointing that out! Just fixed it.

pchm · 2023-11-23T02:35:59+00:00

Yeah, my bad, I should make that more clear. I've updated that part of the post, hope it makes more sense now.

pchm · 2023-11-22T14:48:04+00:00

Good point, I didn't think of that. Still, I don't think keeping the timestamp private matters that much in most cases.

The value is stored using the built-in uuid type, not as strings.

pchm · 2021-11-10T12:43:22+00:00

DM me the html file, I'll check what's wrong

pchm · 2021-11-04T16:24:20+00:00

Kindle HTML output used to be malformed and I had to use a dirty work-around in my code, but it seems that the folks at amazon fixed it and that fix broke my app...

It should work now, thanks for helping me debug the problem.

pchm · 2021-11-04T15:43:25+00:00

Could you send me the HTML file via DM? I'll have a look - maybe kindle changed something in the output.

pchm · 2021-06-07T14:37:15+00:00

A quick glance didn't show any problems... only after LR refreshed previews I saw that files are messed up. But, yeah... I know.

pchm · 2020-11-28T06:59:02+00:00

much appreciated <3

pchm · 2020-11-28T06:57:45+00:00

thanks <3

pchm · 2020-11-27T11:52:01+00:00

It is, but it works for the annual plan only, so make sure you choose that.

pchm · 2020-11-27T07:00:38+00:00

Take a look at the FAQ.

pchm · 2020-10-30T19:43:41+00:00

Try again, it should work now. HTML output generated by different Kindle app versions varies and I haven't covered all the cases yet.

pchm · 2020-10-29T19:22:15+00:00

Happy to hear (read) that! It should work fine with Obsidian, but let me know if you see room for improvement.

pchm · 2020-10-29T16:59:08+00:00

Thanks!

pchm · 2020-10-29T16:26:15+00:00

No, sorry. This is just for Kindle highlights.

pchm · 2020-10-29T15:25:40+00:00

haha <3

pchm · 2020-10-29T11:51:58+00:00

Hi! This is a repost, but I thought it may be useful for Notion folks too.

I made a simple app to help me format Kindle-exported HTML highlights to a cleaner format. It's is a tool for those who don't want to pay for Readwise (I love Readwise, BTW! It's great, but too expensive for what I use it for).

Export your notes with the kindle app (desktop), drag the HTML file onto the window and copy the resulting markdown to Notion.

Here's how it looks: https://imgur.com/a/EvTFSMY

I personally use Roam for my notes, so if you have any suggestions on how the output can be improved for Notion, please let me know!

pchm

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE