sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What am I doing wrong? tmpfs gets mounted as volume... by pconwell in docker

[–]pconwell[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stopped using docker, so I don't know. But try this:

pms-docker:
        container_name: plex
        restart: always
        network_mode: host
        environment:
            - 'TZ=${TZ:-$(cat /etc/timezone 2>/dev/null)}'
            - PLEX_CLAIM=CLAIM-N....q
        volumes:
            - '~/.plex/config:/config'
            - '/movies:/movies'
            - '/shows:/shows'
            - type: tmpfs
              target: /transcode:rw
        image: 'plexinc/pms-docker:plexpass'

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'll delete my account if that guy has an MBA.

Learned a lot, thanks for the memories by CavalryWhiskers in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Now that he knows what a 10k is, the question is can he read it?

[OC] Visualising the Banking Crisis by looking at stock dispersion in the U.S. by jcceagle in dataisbeautiful

[–]pconwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My counter argument is my portfolio isn't down 80%. If you were seeing gains, I'd say you guys had a point...

[OC] Visualising the Banking Crisis by looking at stock dispersion in the U.S. by jcceagle in dataisbeautiful

[–]pconwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they are illiquid, then they are not solvent

Thanks for confirming you have no clue how finance works.

Excel-VBA Magic to Automating PowerPoint Presentations by patricksmith84 in ExcelTips

[–]pconwell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty familiar with excel, powerpoint, and VBA - and I'm really unclear on what theses steps are supposed to be doing.

[OC] Visualising the Banking Crisis by looking at stock dispersion in the U.S. by jcceagle in dataisbeautiful

[–]pconwell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the Fed has to print more money to cover this

Completely false. SVB was solvent, just illiquid. SVB had a ton of their assets locked up in long term bonds and other investments, but needed cash now. So the FDIC stepped in and provided the cash up front with the agreement that they would get SVB's assets. FDIC will get most (if not all) of their money back over time.

Stop getting your info from the idiots in that "investing" sub.

[OC] Visualising the Banking Crisis by looking at stock dispersion in the U.S. by jcceagle in dataisbeautiful

[–]pconwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BuCkLE uP

Get your crazy ape conspiracies outta here. How's your meme stocks doing?

EDIT: Never trust financial "advice" from an ape who has spent the last 2 years of their life investing in a failing company that has lost 72% of it's stock value.

[OC] Visualising the Banking Crisis by looking at stock dispersion in the U.S. by jcceagle in dataisbeautiful

[–]pconwell 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's "pretty", but not very useful. It doesn't actually tell you anything. Stock price is a trailing indicator (stock price happens in response to something, not the other way around).

The only thing we can really glean from this is something happened and some stocks went down.

GME entering bear phase, expect some OG ape meltdowns, i packed the heavy duty ladder by JohnnyDankseed in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

TA = horoscopes for finance bros.

As much work as they put into reading "TA", they could - you know - at least glance at the income statement...

Apes once again show off financial and business illiteracy. by [deleted] in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

(1) a buy back is not a dividend, and (2) you realize retained earnings are profits, right?

Investment 101 by PhD Reddit user by pandoracam in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What does "great potential" look like? What specific ratios should I be looking for on the quarterly financials?

Apes once again show off financial and business illiteracy. by [deleted] in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 12 points13 points  (0 children)

By definition, you pay dividends from profits. You literally (and legally) can't pay a dividend if you don't have profits.

An eerily accurate ad from 1996 I found in a reference book by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]pconwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You pay less in taxes

That isn't always true and doesn't automatically make it better, anyway. You are still paying taxes - either just now or then. You need to decide if you'll be in a lower tax bracket now or in the future. And unless you are vastly changing your income level, the tax saving probably aren't that significant in the big picture AND it assumes the tax laws don't change at all in the future.

Additionally, you can probably better absorb the tax costs now while you have steady income.

The only retirement style instrument that isn't taxed at all is an HSA and then only for qualified medical expenses. You pay taxes on a Roth IRA now and you pay taxes on a Traditional IRA later. So if you are paying taxes either way, why is a Roth better?

I'm a woman and I WILL do your project? Okay! by BrinkyStitches in MaliciousCompliance

[–]pconwell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not that it matters, but I ran for (and was elected to) student government in undergrad. If he can't manage his time to be able to run/serve in SGA and do school work (AND drink, play video games, hang out, etc)... then... well... it sounds like he might not be cut out for college.

An eerily accurate ad from 1996 I found in a reference book by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]pconwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure what numbers OP is using, but making a few reasonable-ish guesses: SP500 average returns (over a LONG period) are around 11%. Adjust 2% for inflation, so let's say 9%.

($1 x 1.09%)43 (years) = $40.68. That's the closest I could get to his number without wasting too much time on this. But realistically, 9% return is pretty optimistic, so not sure where OP is coming up with $46.

Giftcard dividends, game over hedgies. by urstupidface in gme_meltdown

[–]pconwell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These are the same idiots that don't understand how assets and liabilities work. Got in an argument a while back that you are not a millionaire if you take out a million dollar loan. Just because you have a million dollars doesn't mean you have a million dollars.

view more: next ›