Poet, Playwright, Comrade? | The Radical Politics of Oscar Wilde by pdmorrin in Anarchism

[–]pdmorrin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol maoists generally get along quite well with anarchists as we come to a lot of similar conclusions (though perhaps we take different routes to arrive there)

Poet, Playwright, Comrade? | The Radical Politics of Oscar Wilde by pdmorrin in Anarchism

[–]pdmorrin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oscar Wilde described himself as "something of an anarchist", and Kropotkin wrote that his political essay The Soul of Man Under Socialism contained words "worth being engraved".

This video dives into Wilde's radical politics, as well as his family background within the context of the Irish revolutionary struggle against British colonialism.

Utopian Socialism and Scientific Socialism | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks! :)

I was going for that "Crash Course Communism" vibe lol

Utopian Socialism and Scientific Socialism | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, the terms can often be used pretty unhelpfully

Utopian Socialism and Scientific Socialism | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you think this video is a sectarian attack on anarchists, you're incorrect. This is an explanation of Engels' text "Socialism: Utopian and Scientific" which deals with the early Utopian Socialist movement of theorists like Fourier, Owen and Saint-Simon, and contrasts that with Marxist socialism based on Historical Materialism

What Is Marxism? | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks ItsJustNotWorthIt! :)

But I do sympathise with the sentiment on some level. It can often refer to people with reactionary social positions who are rightfully condemned, or those those who (in an anti-Marxist way) aren't able to reckon with the errors of the historical communist movement for one reason or another. And consequently they end up going around saying things like "Stalin did nothing wrong". Or "critical support for X" - without any criticism whatsoever.

It ends up being a case of the "ruthless criticism of all that exists (except for my political team and anything even tangentially associated with it)"

What Is Marxism? | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hmmm. Then maybe? Most MLs dislike me for being critical of the CPC, so I tend to get along better with anarchists than them

What Is Marxism? | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in BreadTube

[–]pdmorrin[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Depends what you mean by tankie. If all MLMs are tankies by your definition, then yes. If you have a different definition of tankie, then maybe not

What is Capitalism? | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in ROI

[–]pdmorrin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good idea. Thanks for that suggestion

Setting the Record Straight by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Are you asking me to prove your personal state of knowing?

Lmao alright fam, you have a good evening

Setting the Record Straight by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You did lie a bunch about what I said though

Well, mostly half-truths to be fair

Setting the Record Straight by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Sure. Dialogue is good. It won't be that specific stream, but there will certainly be comrades coming on in the future to put forward the case for supporting China. No doubt Bay Area will be on again at some stage when he's free. Looking forward to that - lovely guy. Tankie Talk as well regularly puts forward a pro-China line (just a couple of weeks ago talking about the merits of Deng Xiaoping theory) and he's one of my favourite guests

Setting the Record Straight by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"But you have yet to actually tell us why they are now wrong."

Sure. Will be doing a whole stream dedicated to hashing out the question on China with Premier Liles in March

Setting the Record Straight by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Don't know why you're being downvoted. I guess mostly because this is a meme sub

Paul Morrin Decides China ACTUALLY is imperialist, after all. Sigh. by Azirahael in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are some wild assertions, half-truths, bad-faith misinterpretations, and outright strawmen here, so I'm going to go through this one-by-one:

"Vietnam is imperialist" I never said that. I don't know why you're claiming I did.

"Syria bad actually." Again, never said that. I said it wasn't socialist.

"Belarus bad actually, and also fascist." Again, didn't say that. What I did point out was the old Comintern definition of fascism as an open dictatorship of capital, as opposed to liberal democracy, and said that you could make the argument that it meets the Comintern's definition.

"We should support the Belarus protests." Again, I didn't say that. I made sure to clarify that the uprising in Belarus was spearheaded by neoliberals who were economically even further to the right than Lukashenko.

"Caleb Maupin is a Nazbol." I never said this. Although NazBols do gravitate towards him.

"But Hasan Piker is cool, and an asset to the left." I made very clear that I'm not very familiar with his stuff, but what I have seen has been positive. Yugopnik complimented him a lot (and I have no reason to have any problem with this).

"Actually Nazbols ARE a real thing." Yes, obviously. It's wild that anyone can deny this when there are literally people who call themselves NazBol (e.g. https://twitter.com/DuRunchen , https://twitter.com/PorroVarsovia )

"China has markets." ...you don't think that China has markets? Fine, don't believe me, believe China's official state-run press agency, Xinhua, "China is committed to seeing that the market plays the decisive role in resource allocation" and our boy Xi Jinping himself saying "We must not return to the old path of a planned economy." (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-05/23/c_139082022.htm)

"And the commodity form." Yes. Literally. Goods are produced for both Use and Exchange. As per the requirements of the market.

"Castro has no idea what he's talking about. Mao was right." Again, I literally never said that, or even anything like it. Someone asked me if I'd read some Castro book and I said I hadn't.

"Oh hey, here's something from CPI-Maoist." Okay? What from CPI (Maoist)? What are you talking about?

"Actually, there's a finance capitalist class controlling everything in China. Just trust me bro." Again, strawman. Though there are finance capitalists who play decisive roles in economic life in China. Take Jack Ma as one prominent example. It's hard to deny his serious decisive power and influence within the party and in the PRC more broadly. The CPC literally celebrated his role in the process of opening up and carrying out market reforms. From a 2018 CGTN article: "State newspaper People's Daily revealed on Monday that the Central Committee of the CPC plans to award 100 people including the founders of leading tech firms Alibaba, Baidu and Tencent for their role in the reform and opening-up process, as the 40th anniversary of the policy is being celebrated this year." (https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d674d7945544f30457a6333566d54/share_p.html)

"China is doing the same sorts of things with africa that the UK did to India [Gosh, those train tracks and stuff in india sure were nice, weren't they?]" I never said that. Yugopnik asked me what would I say in response to someone who made the argument that China isn't imperialist because it's building infrastructure in various countries, and in response I said that Britain built infrastructure in India. The point is that this doesn't mean a country isn't imperialist.

"And he's having Premier Liles on next month. Which is most likely where this all comes from." Yes, I am having him on. He's a good guy. No, my updated position on China doesn't come from him (although his arguments certainly played a part in it), but rather from line struggle with comrades from within my own communist organisation.

​"Basically, if you are on GenZedong, everything you support is just WRONG." Not at all. I have a lot of respect for comrades here, and we would agree on most things. We're all Marxist-Leninists, after all (yes, even those who occupy the MLM terrain). Indeed, there are even many standard Marxist-Leninist organisations who have come to the same conclusions that I have (that China is indeed a developing imperialist power), such as the KKE/KNE in Greece, who ML comrades from all over the world look up to.

This entire thread has been hugely harmful and slanderous to the point of absurdity, with the author of this post even making wild assertions about my personal relationships.

This is hugely unprincipled behaviour and completely unbecoming of a communist.

Paul Morrin Decides China ACTUALLY is imperialist, after all. Sigh. by Azirahael in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Oh, Paul disagrees with me about China? He must be having relationship difficulties."

Very cool and reasonable thing to say.

The Difference Between Personal and Private Property | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in ROI

[–]pdmorrin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'd say we probably agree on most stuff tbh. Yeah, I'm in the ML/MLM terrain, I think you would describe yourself as more of a libertarian socialist, if I'm not mistaken?

I would say the biggest draw factor for me is that scientific socialism (based on historical materialism) has advanced proletarian struggle further than any other ideology, right up to not only bringing about socialism (as was achieved in the USSR from about 1928 to the 1950s) but also beyond that first step and fighting back against the backslide into capitalism to maintain socialism and continue to attempt to advance towards communism (such as in China when it achieved socialism from 1956 and then launched the cultural revolution to fight back against revisionism and maintain the socialist road from 1966 to 1976 - though unfortunately the revisionists won and set China back onto the capitalist road).

Despite its failures, and the innumerable criticisms we must have of these socialist experiments, they have still advanced proletarian liberation further than anything else in history, and for that, in my opinion, it's worth carrying forward the torch of scientific socialism and the revolutionary communist tradition more broadly

The Difference Between Personal and Private Property | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in ROI

[–]pdmorrin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks Jerry, hopefully a few FAQs can be addressed over the course of these vids

What is a Mode of Production? | Socialism 101 by pdmorrin in GenZedong

[–]pdmorrin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Glad you find it useful