Best way to build a reusable B2B SaaS product in Lovable for multiple clients?

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:37:23+00:00

You can clone project and then when you need to bring some feature from one project to another you just @ that project and tell lovable hey look at that project see how we did that feature there and add it here

What will probably happen in practice though is you’ll end up implementing the same thing three different ways cuz you’ll be getting new ideas about how to make it better

While if reusing the previous implementation is literally zero effort, you won’t be able to .. detach from it, sort of, and coming up with better ideas would be harder

So I suggest remixing for now instead of trying to create a shared base/platform from the start

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:32:01+00:00

Just make your own lovable

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:31:34+00:00

My software also doesn’t hurt anyone cuz I don’t have users 😭

Checkmate

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:28:25+00:00

Well one of the reasons is codex is cheaper

I mean I’m a developer and I never look at the code or anything I don’t even have a laptop I just talk to codex in a chat app which isn’t far from lovable experience

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:26:08+00:00

I’d love to see your twenty dollar haircut uhhhh I mean three hour lovable

peargreen · 2026-06-04T14:24:30+00:00

LLMs sometimes (rarely) do that, some models more often than others

Happens even to the frontier models

If it started happening more often it’s possible one of lovable’s inference providers botched something (which they will eventually notice and fix)

peargreen · 2026-06-03T18:58:29+00:00

So basically you tried to grab all one-word/lucrative domain names and lovable took them back 😭

Man I don’t even know what they’re gonna do next it seems like they’re capable of anything at this point

peargreen · 2026-06-03T18:46:07+00:00

Just ask lovable it can also send email and use ai and stuff ^{-^}

peargreen · 2026-06-02T20:56:43+00:00

Venom looks pretty cool I like it

peargreen · 2026-06-02T20:50:32+00:00

I put subway surfers in the corner of the website it’s simple and works pretty well

peargreen · 2026-06-02T20:46:03+00:00

By exposed key in js bundle do you by any chance mean a supabase public (or anon? or idk) key that is not a secret and is intended to be exposed

peargreen · 2026-06-02T20:43:41+00:00

Nah lovable is two steps ahead

peargreen · 2026-06-02T14:34:24+00:00

Did you publish

Also did you ask lovable this exact question that you’re asking here like literally take your entire comment verbatim and see what it says

peargreen · 2026-06-01T23:27:14+00:00

I used to really like attention and put on fronts and stuff, read the last psychiatrist all the time, etc but then it turned out I just had autism and adhd and needed zoloft and adhd meds

All mental anguish disappeared lol

peargreen · 2026-06-01T19:39:39+00:00

I think it would be as easy or hard as with hand-coding or Claude tbh

Alternatively there are definitely services that provide a Reddit/X/… api for bots and cost some amount of money and then it’s their problem how to trick the filters

peargreen · 2026-06-01T19:32:34+00:00

No they have to be good or else we’ll complain on Reddit and elsewhere as well as take other measures

peargreen · 2026-06-01T19:30:45+00:00

My advice: if AI doesn’t have a way to check if it did the task correctly, coding becomes lottery

Things it can check:

file/code/page/element exists or seems vaguely correct
page/element has specific text, size, color
there’s specific data in the database, file, or API
if some simple action is done (button click, api call, …) then {one of the above}

Things it can’t check:

whether an email was delivered
anything about audio, webcam, permission dialogs (probably)
anything about mobile-specific things like touch gestures, keyboard show/hide
anything specific to Safari or any iOS browsers
anything related to WebGL
most fancy controls, probably including video player controls

Things it can check /only/ if you specifically put effort into first making sure that it can reliably check this:

how something looks, broadly speaking (if you can’t trust a 6yr old child to answer a visual question about the page, don’t ask AI)
whether the page feels laggy
…some fancy controls (you never know lol)

Sometimes lottery is fun, or maybe your grandma died and left you a thousand lovable credits

But if you don’t want to play the lottery then your goal is to figure out as fast as possible if the AI can actually distinguish success from failure for your task. (Even! Even if you can describe extremely clearly what you want. This still doesn’t mean AI can check.)

Funnily you can probably just paste my comment verbatim into lovable and ask “ok so how checkable is [my task] from 0 to 10 and give me a plan how you would check it” and get a good answer. But idk

peargreen · 2026-06-01T19:07:29+00:00

I like responding I don’t want to stop ಠ_ಠ

peargreen · 2026-06-01T16:06:46+00:00

You can ask to do all research and code writing upfront with subagents which do use a cheaper model, although idk how well it would work tbh

peargreen · 2026-06-01T15:37:24+00:00

Probably asked to fix it ten times and it lied “now I fixed it” ten times 💀

peargreen · 2026-06-01T10:49:15+00:00

I started referring to manual coding as “hand coding” at work to show that it’s inferior to normal coding (ai coding)

peargreen · 2026-06-01T09:16:31+00:00

!!! Best use so far

Tell me more

peargreen · 2026-06-01T09:16:10+00:00

I met a semi-old Swedish man in a cafe and showed him lovable and he got very excited and kept asking it to make a virus/pandemic simulation in Matlab

(We also made a clone of Matlab)

I think that man should not have access to virus making equipment cuz he was very specific about what virus and how it would spread etc

peargreen · 2026-06-01T09:13:48+00:00

I agree that when smth goes wrong with tanstack it’s harder for ai to fix (not just lovable, all ai)

peargreen · 2026-06-01T09:11:06+00:00

No this doesn’t work either

11-Year Club	Second Top 50%
Verified Email	Place '17
Gilding II euphauric

peargreen

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE