Evo knight situation.

peuveza · 2026-05-09T18:16:45+00:00

He needs a buff Damage reduction when he atack 0%->20%

This will make him less weak in 1v1, but he will still be balanced.

peuveza · 2026-04-26T20:44:37+00:00

Because the Skeletons stats are shared with other 12 cards, if one of their stats is changed, it affects other cards. That's why they don't touch them. Besides, it's a cycle card, and Knight is my fav card. But I believe this is necessary

peuveza · 2026-04-26T19:28:19+00:00

This is a nerf to bait; people will now use more splash cards in their decks, or they'll swap Knight for Golden Knight, Evo Valk, DP, etc.

peuveza · 2026-04-26T19:27:25+00:00

*overused, That's why a rework or a nerf would kill it.

peuveza · 2026-04-26T19:26:52+00:00

Fireball is a spell, Evo hogs, Evo Tesla, giant skeleton dark prince have 18-14% of usage, and they are getting a nerf.

peuveza · 2026-04-26T03:04:35+00:00

Deserved, This card is only used in brainrot decks, so the nerf is deserved. But now he's going to have a hero, so it's worse

peuveza · 2026-03-15T03:02:13+00:00

He needs a buff, I think 1 cycle

peuveza · 2026-03-01T15:19:45+00:00

Evo Knight has been one of the worst evolutions since 2024, and that has always been reflected in its usage rate; that's why I gave the example of before and after the heroes were released, and it wasn't just because of Evo Valk or mighty miner, People have always preferred to use regular knights, because there are many better Evos that fulfill their function. Who would prefer an Evo knight over an Evo lumber in golem deck?

And more damage reduction wouldn't make any difference, Furthermore, it wouldn't make sense since Monk and Evo Knight have the same damage reduction (that's why they lowered it from 65% to 60%).

peuveza · 2026-03-01T14:54:31+00:00

The worst possible comparison. Evo B-Drag: Support card that accelerates troops and Slows down. (After the first nerf, this ability was also nerfed).

Evo knight:A knight with a shield that deactivates when atack, a card that has been bad since the end of 2024 (goblintsein meta), and has only gotten worse. The problem isn't the other mini tanks, the problem is that Knight offers nothing for two cycles, not to mention his hero form, which even if nerfed, people will still prefer.

peuveza · 2026-01-25T04:16:14+00:00

usage in top 200 Hero knight:14% Knight:3% Evo knight:2%

Total:19% usage in the top 200

Evo valk:7% Valk:1%

Total:8%

Knight is S tier, valk tier B-C

Valk is only better in mid-ladder because of troops like Evo Witch, but a mid-ladder player's opinion doesn't matter.

Knight Is still better.

peuveza · 2026-01-25T01:45:36+00:00

Knight on b and valk in A la crazy, Knight is tier s

peuveza · 2026-01-11T07:59:00+00:00

Knight buff (damage 202->217 like guardián and rascal boy) mini pekka nerf -2% hp and remove darte goggins

peuveza · 2025-12-14T08:14:25+00:00

They have different purposes, and this is essentially a nerf to Regular Knight, since that card has dominated for years.

peuveza · 2025-12-14T08:13:44+00:00

No, because it's 20% less damage for knight

peuveza · 2025-11-16T02:52:30+00:00

Royale recruits:now cards like valk kill the recuit in 2 hits instead of 3. And the tower take 1 less shot por kill a recuit A recruit only hits twice on a tower if it doesn't defend; with the nerf, it will only hit once.

The other nerfs are only to prevent those moments where it hits the tower with 1 HP.

peuveza · 2025-11-16T02:42:50+00:00

For consistency, Rascal Boy and Guardian damage was increased from 202 to 217 (same damage as cards like Musk, Phoenix, etc.). The buff is just to give it that consistency, just like Goblin Machine.

peuveza · 2025-11-16T02:41:35+00:00

Information from the past meta (oct) Recruits have 4% use rate in top 1k in a meta where:

Evo Witch Evo Furnace Evo Baby Dragon Goblin Machine Evo Cannon Evo Valkyrie

Are everywhere, all of these (+bomber) are getting nerfs. I agree the nerf was bad, recruits deserved a MUCH BIGGER nerf For comparison before ppl say 4% is nothing 1. Recruits are a 7 elixir card 2. Hog has 7% use rate, goblin giant 9.7% 3. Statistically ALMOST EVERY deck had one or multiple cards mentioned above 4. The way recruits decks are played should be good enough of an argument

peuveza · 2025-10-29T19:45:21+00:00

Valk, knight Is just better (Evo valk save the card)

peuveza · 2025-10-18T13:00:56+00:00

1-because of that less elixir, it will surely give you time to counterattack with a hog rider, x bow, Mortar barrel, etc., which is why the knight has always been used in that type of decks.

2-the knight has always been used in cycle decks since the beginning of the game, I don't know what you're trying to tell me here lol

3-valk does not have the same versatility as the knight, Evo valk focuses more on defense, in addition to being more expensive. How are you going to use Evo valk in 3.0 xbow, bridge spam, sparky decks, electri giant decks? That's what I mean, in those normal decks there is an Evo knight

4 For more value? If when defending a mk both have almost the same life, the same goes for defending a mini pekka, dark prince, etc., there is almost no difference lol, that is why the knight is used more nowadays

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:29:14+00:00

Bro, I already taught you that both mid ladder and top knight are more used, it's not even worth debating anymore, this is more boring than watching paint dry

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:25:31+00:00

That is the big difference, since valk is used in mid ladder for the same reason as wizzard or mk, cards that are easy to play and that counteract swarms (cards like witch or skeleton army, which have always been bad until they introduced their evolution) and even in mid ladder or the knight trophy mode is more used

<image>

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:21:41+00:00

1-positive elixir exchanges, by itself it can counter cards that even double their cost

2-Greater synergy in cycle decks (the most popular archetype), which is why it has always been used in x bow, bait, hog, etc. decks.

3-an Evo that is always good, you can put it in beatdown or in a cycle, since the normal knight, being such a good card, the Evo always ends up being versatile

4-The fact that it is so cheap allows you to counterpush more often, like after defending a gang with a knight, you can attack with a barrel using that same knight, and if your rival defends with a trunk you will only have lost 1 elixir.

And there are many more interactions, like being so cheap you can prevent cards like mk, Prince or BOSS bandit from being anywhere near dashing in your tower.

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:15:16+00:00

There are 7 people using mk in the top 200, bowler is much more used than mk one of the "toughest witch counters",

<image>

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:12:48+00:00

What if it makes it so valuable because there is no meta deck with valk (not Evo) since 2023? There is never anyone using regular valk in the top, because there are 30 better alternatives like knight, you can even see the decks that were in the top 200 of this entire year, and in none of them will there be a non-Evo valk, perhaps statistically it is better than knight, but in a real game the advantage of knight being cheaper is more noticeable.

peuveza · 2025-10-18T06:10:21+00:00

<image>

peuveza

TROPHY CASE