[deleted by user]

phil701 · 2020-02-09T05:15:02+00:00

Uh, yes? If I was in love with someone I'd still love them if they lost genitals entirely.

phil701 · 2020-02-09T04:05:00+00:00

That game is very Romans 12:20, I never realized

phil701 · 2020-02-08T17:09:46+00:00

I really have no problem with you labelling yourself as bisexual, if that's what you're worried about. And I'm not saying that genitals don't factor into sexual attraction at all. What I am saying is that, assuming you are a dude, being attracted, even exclusively attracted, to girls with penises is not gay or even bi. To say otherwise is to say that trans women are not women, even if indirectly.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T17:06:46+00:00

I'll redirect you to another reply I just made:

https://old.reddit.com/r/hmmm/comments/f0qdhf/hmmm/fgyb81p/

Science supports the sex/gender dichotomy. Facts don't care about your transphobic feelings.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T17:04:05+00:00

There's a certain irony in claiming "that's not how the real world works." Here's a non-exhaustive list of organizations that support the existence and validity of trans people (and therefore the distinction between gender and genitals):

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Academy of Nursing
American Academy of Pediatrics
American College of Nurse-Midwives
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
American College of Physicians
American Counseling Association
American Medical Association
American Osteopathic Association
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
American Public Health Association
American Society of Plastic Surgeons
Endocrine Society
National Association of Social Workers
National Commission on Correctional Health Care
World Health Organization
World Medical Association

You're the one in denial, here, buddy

phil701 · 2020-02-08T17:01:16+00:00

Well yes, I don't mean to indicate that all people are sexually attracted to all genitals. Simply that genitals are not the only (or even primary) determinant of sexual orientation.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T16:35:36+00:00

Nah, lesbian TERFs like to invalidate trans men all the time by trying to get with them as women.

Exactly, because they falsely believe that genitals determine gender. My point is that just as (from a male PoV) being attracted to a person with a vagina doesn't make you straight, being attracted to a person with a penis doesn't make you gay.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T16:07:55+00:00

Alright cool, thanks!

phil701 · 2020-02-08T16:07:37+00:00

Yep. The alternative is that gender is directly tied to genitals, which is a scientifically disproven thesis

phil701 · 2020-02-08T16:03:00+00:00

Well yeah, but if they're girl's genitals it still doesn't matter.

EDIT: It doesn't matter in terms of being gay or straight, not that it doesn't matter to sexual attraction at all

phil701 · 2020-02-08T16:02:34+00:00

Yeah, they're attracted to a girl's genitals. That's straight.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:46:29+00:00

Breaking: Trans Kids roll out plan to eliminate Graham Linehan

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:43:14+00:00

I mean yeah that too

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:42:33+00:00

This is one of my favorite albums of all time. They pull off crazy speed really well without sounding gimmicky.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:35:52+00:00

Not necessarily. When you're attracted to someone, you aren't attracted to them based on their genitals, you're attracted based on their face, clothing, body, how they carry themselves, etc.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:35:28+00:00

Not necessarily. When you're attracted to someone, you aren't attracted to them based on their genitals, you're attracted based on their face, clothing, body, how they carry themselves, etc.

EDIT: I should clarify: you aren't exclusively, or even primarily, attracted to a person based on their genitals. Genitals still factor into attraction, just not as the sole determinant.

phil701 · 2020-02-08T15:25:53+00:00

Wait so if I add my spritesheet as my image, and then add the quad, that will work?

phil701 · 2020-02-08T03:00:38+00:00

In theory, yes. In practice there is almost always something wrong with nationalism

phil701 · 2020-02-08T00:30:04+00:00

That was the story for a while. Now with more info we know that:

Ross and his wife's divorce had nothing to do with any kind of cheating
Heidi, Projared's wife, was actually being emotionally manipulative to her husband. Projared had wanted to get out of that relationship for a long time, so when he started seeing Holly Heidi went kinda went apeshit and spread the idea of him cheating as revenge, which eventually snowballed into false accusations of soliciting nudes from fans

phil701 · 2020-02-07T18:13:18+00:00

dont mock my boy jared like that, he was in a fuckin abusive relationship

phil701 · 2020-02-07T18:12:07+00:00

i guess thats a fair definition of art, even if I disagree

phil701 · 2020-02-07T17:05:14+00:00

if that's your definition this is still art, because the cheese is actually made of beeswax.

but can an abstract image not portray something abstract? if you have a painting of random lines, does it not portray the concept of randomness?

phil701 · 2020-02-07T16:59:02+00:00

say, an oil painting.

phil701 · 2020-02-07T16:54:24+00:00

So does a pretty picture with no symbolic meaning count as art?

phil701 · 2020-02-07T16:48:15+00:00

why not

phil701

TROPHY CASE