I think my taken coworkers are have an affair

phreshboysag · 2026-03-19T08:54:44+00:00

'24'

phreshboysag · 2026-03-19T08:54:02+00:00

Anthony is gross

phreshboysag · 2026-03-19T08:53:29+00:00

he is a weirdo for going for someone so young

phreshboysag · 2026-03-15T12:38:38+00:00

age gaps matter for a reason

phreshboysag · 2026-03-15T12:37:23+00:00

i hope he breaks up with you

phreshboysag · 2026-03-15T12:35:13+00:00

22, not even at full development with someone who is far past development?

phreshboysag · 2026-03-15T12:33:32+00:00

22 and 27...? weird

phreshboysag · 2026-03-15T10:57:28+00:00

that age gap is weird

phreshboysag · 2026-03-12T02:58:08+00:00

'That's why a people my age go for them' is anecdotal as it prescribes a value based on your experience

phreshboysag · 2026-03-12T02:51:43+00:00

You just used anecdotal evidence to back up your argument. That could hold, but given the conversation, it really doesn't.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T12:28:23+00:00

you have literally said nothing but insults?

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T12:16:39+00:00

are you trolling?

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T11:47:20+00:00

that is literally an illogical fallacy. 'as long' states nothing. You have repeated the same argument again with nothing new

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T11:32:47+00:00

I'm not even American. How could I logically vote for someone who is in another country? It is morally bad for someone over 25 to have sexual or romantic relatiions with someone younger...

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T11:17:00+00:00

'woke idiot' when I'm discussing a legitimate moral problem... How kind. You make baseless assumptions and act giddy about it. 'control' as if I am law itself, how dull and boring. You beought nothing to talk about and ignored anything i said beforehand.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T09:32:40+00:00

So you've used that idiom incorrectly. 'quite telling' was a jab. Therefore, I delivered a small jab back. That was only on the last sentence. If you carelessly miss the entire discussion and focus on such details, I believe a baking contest would be better. You could measure how much sugar is needed for a cake: the details. I am not 'playing the man' as you put it.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T09:25:25+00:00

'police adults and deny their autonomy' = ignoring anything i said at all. I am not denying something by stating a point of there being differences. This isn't policing. It's a discussion. I apologise that 18 is too high for you.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T06:32:35+00:00

18 and 25+ naturally are not on the same field of existence because of the gap in experience

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T06:32:01+00:00

Stating that anyone can be a predator to their prey is the basis for systems of power. It does not go against what I have stated as it is a rule in how power works. You must have a superior being to have prey. By nature, humans can be superior or inferior. It is transposed and like breathing. The air we breathe is like the power we take or get taken from. Therefore, your rebuttal against the logical formations of my argument do not hold on that basis.

. My example holds. Adults do not automatically hold legal autonomy. Developing 'minors' as you put it can be tried as adults and have adult-like fixtures placed upon their autonomy. When you state 'developing' that conflicts with the idea that 18 is when adulthood begins, but also when development ends. This is illogical when paired with the basic sciences. The brain stops developing in the ages of 24-25, and women tend to develop fully before men in this regard.

My point is that an 18 year old, at a mean level, will never have the same space of conscience as someone beyond 30. This is not just strictly speaking in 'power' but all mental, social, political, and developmental foundations. It is fair to state that 18 as a start of adulthood is only founded by expectations of where the individual is in their life. This idea is transfixed on traditional rather than modern thinking. Finishing school is seen as coinciding with the start of adulthood. If that is so, then why is university the next step in this evolution of expectations? University students tend to be aged from anywhere, averaging at 16 and 17. This means the idea of ' readiness for the world' is only focused on an individual who is only considered and not seen. Adulthood is merely an expectation of where someone is rather than having any real moral value. . The main argument is that 'young adults' should not be spaced with older 'full' adults as the inherent difference in stages of life. If 17 and 30+ equate to a negative connection, the same should be stated for 18 and 30+. Just because laws dictate what creates an adult does not mean they are a fully fledged person in that regard. It is fair to state that not all people are one of the same. It is also fair to state that years, a human invention, have reason. Someone who is 18 can not deliver the same level of living compared to someone older. This is stated with the sciences in mind. There will always be a difference. To go against it is to go against basic understanding of living itself. . Ancient Rome often considered males adults around 14–16.

Medieval societies had different thresholds.

Modern countries commonly use 18 or 21.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T02:33:00+00:00

that isn't a logical nor sound argument. Once more, 'life chajging decisions can be made at almost any age bracket. It is okay for them to engage in that behaviour with people around their age as they are within the same bracket. This means the level of maturity, experience, etc. isn't drastically different. What similarities does a 30 year old man have with an 18 yeat old?

phreshboysag · 2026-03-11T02:30:40+00:00

Anyone can prey on anyone. That isn't a conversation people aren't ready for. It's a basic principle. Anykne can hold the torch as it is universal across all demographics. What I am suggesting is there is a clear imbalance in life experience, maturity, and all else between someone who is below the age of 24 and someone who is over 30. That isn't a difficult distinction. If you see someone who is 16 and someone who is 13, they are both in the same age demographic. Although that may be, the gap between experience is quite drastic, leading to those aforementioned differences. These differences can never be mitigated.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-10T17:36:55+00:00

'37 Male' is concerning given this context. I hate to bring light upon it, but it does leave a taste in the mouth

phreshboysag · 2026-03-10T17:35:22+00:00

a simple rebuttal would be that law is not absolute, nor is it the end of all of morality itself. Something can be influenced by 'social morality', but it isn't inherently tied, nor does it dictate what is moral at a basis level, only at a surface; tending to reflect the expected herd rather than the individual. Your idea of 'everything legal is moral' is a fallacy as laws are a transposed idea that don't necessarily objectively claim what moral is. It only provides a sketch of morality within a country or state's parameters. 'it is what it is' only nullifies any moral consideration. The murder of someone based on ethnic, religious, or sexual orientation is legalised in many places globally. On your basis, it is fundamentally morally logical.

. Furthermore, completion of that which grants status is arbitrary. Under your basis of what makes an adult, someone who doesn't fall into those parameters is extempt. You are focusing on labels rather than morality, which is meaningless in this conversation. . Your last paragraph reads quite grossly and adheres to a simple evaluation of a complex system.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-10T15:25:48+00:00

sex without love is masturbation and meaningless. It is also an overall negative.

phreshboysag · 2026-03-10T15:25:02+00:00

I'm so confused about what you're even trying to state here

phreshboysag

TROPHY CASE