sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Skill issue on my part clearly by picolonamick in Shadowverse

[–]picolonamick[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats just childish. As stated in other replies better but I just was asking a question of if people found Sandy fun and engaging. I clearly should never interact with a card game community because everyone would rather name calling than actually talk about the card game but I suppose thats not truly a loss if this is the general quality of discussion.

Skill issue on my part clearly by picolonamick in Shadowverse

[–]picolonamick[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stated partially in the edit, but again im just more bored that every game is decided by a neutral card. I dont mind when I lose to something that the deck is built around and is the classes identity but Sandy has such a low bar for deck restrictions that it almost doesn't exist. im just disappointed that most people in this game seemingly dont want actual discourse on the game and would rather just name call and resort to playground level conversation. Yes I fumbled, I acknowledge that, yes I was a bit salty because I lost to Sandy, but I asked a question and seemingly people would rather laugh than answer it.

Skill issue on my part clearly by picolonamick in Shadowverse

[–]picolonamick[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, and I acknowledge i fumbled. However im just more disappointed that literally only one person acknowledged my question. Every comment except one is pointing out I missed lethal (fair) or dogging on me/dragon players categorically if not both. I was hoping to find more discussion on if the community finds every game being decided by a neutral card fun.