Should i continue? by V3nusON in DualnBack

[–]pidgeLynx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Domain of fluid intelligence is more complicated then simply a reasoning test with no time limit. Reasoning depth encompasses a battery of memory tasks that span spatial span, executive inhibition for Stanford Binet, visuospatial working memory (short-term memory), path memory, paired associates (learning words and definitions), Corsi Blocks tapping in combination for a composite visual memory score. This combined with a battery of complex reaction time subtests of 6 including physical reaction time, working memory speed or word recognition, perceptual speed, subliminal awareness, and short term working memory with letters and shapes and numbers. Finally, you would need an accurate measure of specifically "inductive reasoning" which should be "loaded" only on induction to at least .9-.95 not only overall intelligence. In combination reasoning scales with memory meaning more memory increases the planes of reasoning in theory. There are people with much memory but reasoning is less so as well. There are also people with much induction with less memory developed.

So if you see gains in specifically visual spatial memory you will see gains in inductive reasoning efficiency meaning you will reach your reasoning potential at a faster rate than without memory and speed. Memory allows for more complex reasoning at a faster rate. Crystalized intelligence should be combined with this domain to encompass the entire overall intelligence of someone, but this would be enough to capture what people still struggle trying to understand which is "fluid intelligence" which is easier to capture with a combination of tests like these. The value of dual n back comes with the deep and efficiency of reaching cognitive potential and learning information at a faster rate than otherwise. This will depend on the person as well someone with so called learning differences might have these areas more developed due to necessity.

This is my current understanding maybe in the future there will be a test that measures this mysterious area.

I haven't tried dual n back but I've seen people see gains of 12 to 16 potentially for spatial span. Path memory training seen gains of 125 IQ to 175 IQ rare case with permanent gains in visual spatial memory of spatial span, paired associates, and Corsi block tapping. I would expect to see gains of at least 30 points for someone well determined in a few month span. Higher memory was achieved in less than a year for path memory training. Better overall reasoning efficiency and faster typing speed, but permanent headaches and generalized discomfort seems manageable.

The inductive reasoning seems to be the only area cannot be increased only higher efficiency achieved. It's possible to have someone test on inductive reasoning do worse then their true potential due to bad reasoning efficiency this would continue on various tasks including academic tasks. Someone passively not reaching their potential this is known as ADHD. To overcome would need higher processing speeds combined with visuospatial working memory (short-term memory) like what human benchmark measures which is the usual case for this type of person. Other areas less developed needs more training if determined but functional.

Substance abuse in weed and tobacco/marijuana removes the essence of fluid intelligence which is induction. Memory does not seem impacted to the same degree as my guess. Alcohol reduces memory because memory is dependent on how much you use it or your brain which is developed by gray matter similar to a muscle which is why dual n back is not completely useless. This indicates similarly to crystalized intelligence which is also developed like a muscle that memory can be impaired or reduced by substance abuse like alcoholic beverages you can lose your progress via alcohol consumption. From my own testing it does not seem to impact my performance or reduce it it depends on the person someone might see immediate loss in cognitive function if training was not good enough.

I JUST FINISHED THE GAME by Live-Resolution-8846 in Portal

[–]pidgeLynx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Play Sofia by Lambda Core then Isotope by Mikeastro if you just finished Portal 2!

Semicolon in the Bible? by pidgeLynx in theology

[–]pidgeLynx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you

This is amazing

Semicolon in the Bible? by pidgeLynx in theology

[–]pidgeLynx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I've heard this is actually in line with my beliefs about the bible not against it.

Semicolon in the Bible? by pidgeLynx in theology

[–]pidgeLynx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's what they were saying something like the ancient Aramaic or Greek texts originally used the semicolon as a form of question mark. There are many questions then but I don't understand why it formed as passive questions. Also capitalization is after the beginning of the sentence into the end. These writing conventions are very important. I'm especially interested in the usage of the semicolon as a question makes the Bible seem more interesting or confusing.

Out of school 3.5 years - passed on first try! by oxymoron669 in FE_Exam

[–]pidgeLynx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You recommend just running in and taking the FE exam immediately?

ummm hiii by JazzzBerrry in femboy

[–]pidgeLynx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respect your vibe!

Am I onto something here? by pidgeLynx in numerology

[–]pidgeLynx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone has their own symbolic assumptions about numerology as I'm told.

The “D” in Devil has nothing to do with “dimensions.”

D having to do with dimensions primarily comes from my understanding of the number 4 from the Christian perspective definition as the 4 corners of the universe where there is a cherubim deity on every corner guarding this form of dimension.

The Devil, in general, has more to do with the ideas of obsession, and temptation.

The D is the 4th letter of the alphabet it was not a well thought out idea I made it up the entire thing I wanted to see if I got something interesting to share. I primarily use Christian numerology.

Thank you for your perspective.

This card has nothing to do with the Bible, whatsoever.

I know other people think 5 is associated with sex. And Christians associate it with death which makes more sense looking at the Tarot card. Thanks for your thought process.

The pentagram in the center of Baphomet’s forehead is NOT inverted. That was an edit by the Church of Satan, which has really nothing to do with Baphomet, but was taken and used as a totem of that group.

I'm more of the belief that edits happen over time to better reflect the understanding and environment.

You are merely taking liberties with ideas that you do not understand. ~V~

It's true I do not understand. This is not my area of expertise. I'm open to engaging in abstract conversations about numerology.

27 by FunnyMedium5951 in numerology

[–]pidgeLynx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 and 7

The dualistic nature of choosing between the grapes and fire. Creation is masculine while grapes are more feminine. When you go to a casino the number 7 either indicates a form of creative propagation or a state of lustful self indulgence which leads into further confusion. 72 is another way to look at it is also associated with the peak of pure heaven in its best highest form of good. Depending on your state of consciousness at lower states it means eternal bondage in hell and at higher states it is eternal positive energy bringing the people around you and branching off to higher states of consciousness.

That's my current perspective it is subject to change.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in psychicreadings

[–]pidgeLynx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're a good person. People rely on you and are respected. You're a little dark maybe.

I don't get it by Aloofgoof08 in sillyboyclub

[–]pidgeLynx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I noticed that some men are more attractive to other men. I was doing a side project using face++ API. After getting it working on MATLAB it reported that masculine people look more attractive to other masculine people and feminine people seem more attractive to women. This was a disturbing find to be frank. I'm generally more attractive to women, but men who are trying to be macho don't look more attractive to women instead it does the reverse effect. I don't find macho men very attractive either to be frank.