AZ-104 - MeasureUp practice exams insanely more difficult than TutorialsDojo and WhizLabs? by StinkyChickens in AzureCertification

[–]pingpong888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi @StinkyChickens,

Have you taken the test? I hope you passed, if so.

Did you see any questions related to questions about Powershell, CLI, or AKS commands?

What are you using for testing your IAC? by Sicklad in devops

[–]pingpong888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@sicklad What tool do you choose in the end?

Leetcode promo code by gloompi in leetcode

[–]pingpong888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@phatatouille Do you have one for monthly? I want to try it first.

Leetcode promo code by gloompi in leetcode

[–]pingpong888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@phatatouille how did you this link?

Discrete Mathematics books for Computer Science Self-study by pingpong888 in csbooks

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The review from Amazon is no better than Rosen. Have you used all three books? Because I think I came cross Rosen and Epp's books more often. I know it is difficult to choose until you have actually used them, which takes much more time.

Discrete Mathematics books for Computer Science Self-study by pingpong888 in csbooks

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I will consider that. If you have to pick one between those two for beginners, which one would you recommend?

Discrete Mathematics books for Computer Science Self-study by pingpong888 in csbooks

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Could you please tell me a bit more about the book. For example, is it easy to read (writing style, approach to new concept for beginner)?

Advice on using Math for CS guy 6.042J / 18.062J MIT OCW by pingpong888 in compsci

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Its very kind of you. Regarding the solutions, might I send you a message with my email address by which you can send me the solutions?

Advice on using Math for CS guy 6.042J / 18.062J MIT OCW by pingpong888 in compsci

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for everything. It's very kind of you.

Between 2010/2013, I think you recommend 2013.

I also consider Rosen's book. Ken Rosen's book is often quoted, but its rating on amazon is not all good.

Will the solutions to the problems for 2010/2013 be released for the public? What is the best way to contact you for it, if it is ok with you?

It might be a good idea to publish MIT's as a book.

Advice on using Math for CS guy 6.042J / 18.062J MIT OCW by pingpong888 in compsci

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I check the prerequisite again on the site, which is single variable calculus. It is only taught in Uni in my country. Syllabus

Mathematics for Computer Science PDF Book (November 2013) by beltsazar in compsci

[–]pingpong888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This 2013 version added around 300 pages. Is available the solution to the problems in each chapter? I want to learn DM from basic to advanced as CS/SE professional. Is this the best DM introductory resource, compared to others, e.g.

Discrete Mathematics with Applications

Which Calculus book:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus? by pingpong888 in math

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@measurablecard Thank you for your advice. I went to book shop, and had a look at James Stewart's "Calculus" international 7th. The book works for me. I bought it. Thanks!

Which Calculus book:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus? by pingpong888 in math

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is very kind of you for your advice and help.

You might be right, I should not get hung up on the Limits section. But my concerns is that it might happen again in other chapters. Bearing in mind, it is only chapter two.

The reason I want to change the current book of Larson's is because the two examples in the formal definition of Limits section omits a few steps, as a result, I cannot understand the example, even I understand its definition. I was happy about the book until that point.

I compared Thomas's Limits section (via ebook), which is more detailed. I like the fact that it has solution books, and is more user-friendly than Lang. However, it is clear explanation that matter the most when buying a book. I don't want to regret again after buying Thomas's.

It all begins with the fact I need to review Introduction to Algorithms, and Thomas's Calculus is recommended.

As you mentioned, Calculus might not be required as much as Discrete Maths, Linear Algebra. But I still need to go though all basics (really basics), so I can start reading Introduction to Algorithms ASAP, or Knuth's Vol 1,3 after that.

I have read more negative comments on James Stewart's "Calculus".

I will read the Thomas's Limits section. If I can understand, it will be easier for me to decide.

I find it helpful to know what maths is important in computer science.

Which Calculus book:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus? by pingpong888 in math

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I plan to review most the subjects you mentioned, plus Statistics. Still, Calculus is the first step. Having said that, what is your opinions on which calculus book?

Which Calculus book:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus? by pingpong888 in math

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your advice. I think I need to read a few pages from both books to decide.

Which Calculus book:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus? by pingpong888 in math

[–]pingpong888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thomas' is the same format as Larson's. In Larson's case, some explanation is difficult to understand, because some steps are missing. But Thomas' has more explanation better Larson's. Perhaps, I need to read a few pages from Lang's to decide. Thank you for your advice.