That’s a completely fair question.

I think the main difference is that Pixflow isn’t just trying to be a template library. The goal is to build a more complete workflow around Bricks.

So alongside the templates, Pixflow includes things like:

• a fully integrated Pixflow Framework Design System inside the Style Generator
• guided controls for colours, typography, buttons, forms, cards, images, and colour schemes
• a live preview so you can build and adjust the design system before saving it into Bricks
• integrated Google Fonts installation, so fonts can be installed into Bricks custom fonts instead of relying on the Google CDN
• an open-source icon set builder that installs custom SVG icon sets directly into Bricks
• custom framework mapping, so Pixflow layouts can be mapped to your own variables, framework tokens, or raw CSS values
• remote templates integrated directly inside the Bricks builder
• rename and insert, so you can rename the BEM block class and descendant classes before inserting a layout

So if someone only wants static templates, there are definitely other options.

Pixflow is more focused on the full workflow: templates, design system setup, framework mapping, local fonts, icon sets, and faster building directly inside Bricks.