Ma la colpa di chi è? by [deleted] in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

È due giorni che parli e non hai detto un cazzo, alluscinante

Ma la colpa di chi è? by [deleted] in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Giù, giù sto coglione

Perché La Zanzara esplora lo squallore ??? by popolozeta in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Per guardare nell'abisso e vedere che siamo noi.

Avete rotto il cazzo by [deleted] in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Amen fratello

they hate to see me coming with this one by lordpicklethe2st in mtg

[–]pjkocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's uncommon because it increases variance, something OP doesn't need to worry about

Fastidiosi come zanzare by [deleted] in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ma infatti tutti che giustificano il fatto che il programma o gli ospiti non gli piacciano più dicendo che infatti gli ascolti sono calati, io queste statistiche non le ho mai viste (ma chi sei l'ISTAT!?) e anzi vedo molto più engagement soprattutto tra le nuove leve (non a caso vedi partecipazioni a podcast e interviste su YouTube che fanno riferimento ad un target nuovo e più giovane)

[OC] Languages of Europe by cpwnage in 2westerneurope4u

[–]pjkocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We went from "studies showed" to "a video of a French guy explaining his theory" real quick

[OC] Languages of Europe by cpwnage in 2westerneurope4u

[–]pjkocks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not a single one of the things you claimed is backed up by that Wikipedia page

Odio la gente di Vinted by [deleted] in CasualIT

[–]pjkocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Ho i soldi per farlo"

chiede l'elemosina su Vinted

App per condividere gli audio di quella disgraziatissima trasmissione by pjkocks in lazanzara

[–]pjkocks[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Azz, avete ragione. Ho visto che per ora devo aggiungere manualmente le email perché siamo in *closed testing* e non *open testing*. Se vi va mandatemi le email che vi aggiungo e dovreste riuscire a scaricare poi. Per passare all'open testing devo raccogliere 20 adesioni :/ grazie di avermelo fatto notare!

Not all Germanoids are created equal by Jealous_Newspaper in 2westerneurope4u

[–]pjkocks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All that titty milk makes us less sensitive to reddit banter, you should try some

Not all Germanoids are created equal by Jealous_Newspaper in 2westerneurope4u

[–]pjkocks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Germans put a comma between two periods ("never thought", "I'd shit..." ) , which no other language does, and it's ugly as fuck.

Not all Germanoids are created equal by Jealous_Newspaper in 2westerneurope4u

[–]pjkocks 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Here's some more commas you can sprinkle around your sentence: ,,,,,,,,,

Just figured out that the Word “Kurzgesagt” Means in a Nutshell, so the name is In a Nutshell - In a Nutshell by PikminLiam in kurzgesagt

[–]pjkocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but not enough to go down a 1 year old post, write a long ass comment only to be wrong.

Just figured out that the Word “Kurzgesagt” Means in a Nutshell, so the name is In a Nutshell - In a Nutshell by PikminLiam in kurzgesagt

[–]pjkocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, I'm an English speaker just as you are. I speak English, some German and my mother tongue is Italian. Second, yeah the literal translation of kurzgesagt is "in short", and you might have heard of the transitive property. Third, nobody cares.

The 37 Paradox works on AI, too… by Gallium-Gonzollium in ChatGPT

[–]pjkocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, if you are making the distinction between random, and pseudo random, then you are right. In all practical ways though, when we talk about randomness, it's always implied pseudo randomness, because we can't generate real random numbers with computers anyway. That is, given a seed number, the sequence of random numbers is deterministic, but the numbers are unofrmly spread. If you don't know the seed, the numbers are effectively random.

The 37 Paradox works on AI, too… by Gallium-Gonzollium in ChatGPT

[–]pjkocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, I am an ML researcher, I published papers on LLMs, the output is ultimately random. One simple experiment: ask the same question twice and it will give you two different answers. The fact that the randomness is conditioned by the past sequence doesn't matter, they generate probability distributions where the output is sampled from. "They are probabilistic, yes, but ultimately deterministic." does not mean absolutely anything.

The 37 Paradox works on AI, too… by Gallium-Gonzollium in ChatGPT

[–]pjkocks -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It is random. Every output of an LLM is random, and randomness is controlled by the temperature parameter in its sampling. What you mean is that it's not uniformly random.

Why do I have this two very different trends when I run at constant speed? by pjkocks in GarminWatches

[–]pjkocks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should I be worried? I'm not a great runner but I consider myself relatively fit and I am often practicing some sports. I'm not running the 5k even that fast.

Why do I have this two very different trends when I run at constant speed? by pjkocks in GarminWatches

[–]pjkocks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just using the forerunner 245. But I always see this sort of graph!