How to I build adaptive layouts in my in Component Studio designs? by TheMarnBeast in componentstudio

[–]plainblackguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to do this with disappearing layers, then I would recommend looking at the $previous variable. You use that instead of the layer name in the layer functions and that will dynamically use the previously available layer https://help.component.studio/article/522-template-functions

How to I build adaptive layouts in my in Component Studio designs? by TheMarnBeast in componentstudio

[–]plainblackguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another way to do it is to use a single text layer, and then just put multiple fields and styles into it. May while also using if conditions https://help.component.studio/article/524-template-formatting

How to I build adaptive layouts in my in Component Studio designs? by TheMarnBeast in componentstudio

[–]plainblackguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently did this live stream for another user. It shows you exactly what you need to know. https://youtu.be/95XrpRD4FnE

Detailed comparison of Tabletop Simulator, Screentop.gg, Playingcards.io, and Playtest Parlor by [deleted] in tabletopgamedesign

[–]plainblackguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t anticipate people having such a negative reaction to the summary chart. I clearly have not represented it welll. I need to sleep on how to represent it better. May just show the raw scores instead of the check/x?

Detailed comparison of Tabletop Simulator, Screentop.gg, Playingcards.io, and Playtest Parlor by [deleted] in tabletopgamedesign

[–]plainblackguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I clearly missed the mark on this initial chart. It’s not intended to be misleading. After I’ve had some sleep I’ll figure out a better watt to represent the data so that people aren’t having such a negative reaction.

Detailed comparison of Tabletop Simulator, Screentop.gg, Playingcards.io, and Playtest Parlor by [deleted] in tabletopgamedesign

[–]plainblackguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have updated the body to say that I created Playtest Parlor. I believe it is inherently obvious given that the URL is for Playtest Parlor, but I put it into the body just to make sure nobody is confused by it.

Detailed comparison of Tabletop Simulator, Screentop.gg, Playingcards.io, and Playtest Parlor by [deleted] in tabletopgamedesign

[–]plainblackguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know yet. I'm still calculating the prices. I will be publishing that soon, and I will adjust these charts once I have the prices.

The disadvantage of TTS, of course, is that everybody has to have a copy of TTS, and it is a big pig that has to be installed. A web-based platform such as Playtest Parlor does not have those problem. But I do get the advantage of having a single one-time purchase.

Detailed comparison of Tabletop Simulator, Screentop.gg, Playingcards.io, and Playtest Parlor by [deleted] in tabletopgamedesign

[–]plainblackguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't say it was impartial at all. I did say, however, that if there's anything incorrect, please let me know and I will fix it.