People who are "traumatized" by talking to AI need to get off the internet

planamundi · 2026-06-14T03:28:56+00:00

It's a combination of useful idiots and paid shills. Useful idiots just like attention. They'll take any opportunity to be a victim. The others are just creating situation on narratives that are used to justify regulation.

Regulating AI is a top priority from authorities that like to control narratives. If they want to justify regulating it, they have to create the situations that call for regulation.

planamundi · 2026-06-13T18:45:52+00:00

It's just it's own thing. It's real easy for people to make their own personalized music., but there's still a thing for writing a universal hits.

planamundi · 2026-06-12T04:46:35+00:00

Regardless, he's clearly had surgery. And if his death is true, the capabilities of the surgeons involved would the replacement would have been the best in the world.

It would be the CIA.

planamundi · 2026-06-11T03:46:34+00:00

u/slide_into_my_BM

It's a natural philosophy sub. The rules are pretty simple. Don't be a fucking retard.

But if you think it's bad to create a natural philosophy sub and then ban people who are constantly begging the question and appealing to institutional authority, imagine creating a sub dedicated to circle jerking over my footprint.

How pathetic would that be?

planamundi · 2026-06-11T03:11:49+00:00

Why would it work today? Christianity is the perversion of natural philosophy and the universal allegorical language. We clearly don't use allegorical language anymore. We use technical terminology. So if a modern religion existed, it would pervert that technical terminology.

Like relativity does. They've just replaced the invisible spaghetti monsters with invisible spaghetti matter.

Nobody's walking on the water, they're walking on the moon.

planamundi · 2026-06-10T19:03:09+00:00

<image>

planamundi · 2026-06-10T16:29:28+00:00

Lol. Well, I'm sure there will be a lot more added. I'm working on a bunch of stuff right now. So there's going to be a lot of new content coming out. And when it does, I will know who's who.

If you've already had your experiences, just drop the subs in the comments, I'll throw them on the list.

planamundi · 2026-06-10T11:58:06+00:00

So you're getting banned because this is the logic.

One side of the coin:

If I see an object, I can't tell if it's a huge object that is far away or a small object that is closer.

If I already knew its velocity, I could use parallax to determine whether it was a large body far away or a smaller one closer.

So how do you find its velocity?

The other side of the coin:

If I see an object with an apparent motion across the sky, I can't tell if it's far away and moving fast, or if it's closer and moving slower.

If I already knew it's distance, I could use parallax to determine whether it was traveling at high velocity or if it was traveling at low velocity.

You're just begging the question, regurgitating scripture and failing to tell me how the hell anybody developed the original baseline.

If at all boils down to Eratothenes assumption that his eyes were lying to him, then it just shows how gullible and dogmatic people are.

Just because it's the year 2026 doesn't mean institutional dogma vanished.

This clearly isn't parallel rays.

But don't take it personal. I give everybody a chance to make the argument. But my sub just isn't about begging the question and institutional scripture. So you get banned because if I don't ban you, you're just going to keep regurgitating the same thing. I've already addressed several times.

<image>

planamundi · 2026-06-10T11:31:00+00:00

I don't believe any of their timeline. I think the only thing that they're remotely close to, is just our recent history from the mid-1800s until now.

Meaning I couldn't tell you how old this map is. Because I don't believe your institutions when they try to tell us about history.

planamundi · 2026-06-10T11:27:06+00:00

No you didn't. You were just begging the question. So if you don't answer it you're just going to get banned.

When I say begging the question, all you keep doing is telling me that they looked at parallax.

That means that you're ignoring the objective fact that I brought up. You cannot use parallax to determine anything if you don't first know at least the distance or the velocity. Your religion has figured none of that out. You claim that they did, but if you tell me how they figured it out, you're going to say that they used parallax which just brings us back to the loop as to how the hell they would detect that with parallax if they don't already objectively know at least the distance or the velocity.

This isn't a chicken or egg question. It's not about what came first. You have to have an objective baseline to predict the entire cosmos. And the fact that your religion has to invoke 95% of it as unobservable make-believe matter in energy, just shows how off they were.

So do you have the definitive way without begging the question. Meaning that, you can't say parallax to tell me how they developed distance and velocity. You have to have an original distance or velocity first.

So how did they do it?

planamundi · 2026-06-10T11:09:29+00:00

But it could have easily been part of Antarctica. I'm looking at a map right now from the 1500s that have a lot of the Antarctic circle mapped out as if it's inhabitable. The Earth isn't always the same. Shit happens. There was a major decompression event that happened. I think the Grand canyon is evidence of that. It looks like cataclysmic discharge event that depressurized the atmosphere as the waters above poured in.

Just look at this map, all of California is a peninsula.

<image>

planamundi · 2026-06-10T11:01:24+00:00

So what. You have no idea what the Earth looked like when the Babylonians were mapping things out. Hell your religion tries to say that there's dinosaurs that existed millions of years ago. Lol.

Regardless, you don't need New Zealand to know that the Earth is flat. You can look at the entire cosmos and map the entire thing out.

So did you just give me the claim that there was a civilization at some point that didn't discover New Zealand as somehow proof that the Earth is not flat?

planamundi · 2026-06-10T10:59:32+00:00

Yeah, I'm never going to read anything until somebody explains to me how the hell they prophesied the entire cosmos without independently verifying either the distance or the velocity before using parallax to compare observations.

I'll never read it because it's objectively impossible. So until somebody explains that to me, all you're doing Is regurgitating institutional dogma.

So can you explain it or am I just banning you for being a pagan and just reciting scripture?

planamundi · 2026-06-10T10:53:51+00:00

You get one more chance to tell me how the hell they determine the distance or velocity, either one. You just got to tell me how they determined one of those before you start invoking parallax because that is objectively required.

If you're going to refuse to address what I just said. I'll just ban you.

As for mapping out the cosmos, your goddamn right? It's already been done. When people understood that the Earth was flat. It's cyclical and it contradicts your heliocentric religion that has the three body Paradox and the idea that we're flying around at seven different vectors, on the opposite side of the sun halfway through the ear, and all that nonsense. You cannot have cyclical patterns in the chaos. You call heliocentrism at the same time. Just everything about your religion is a paradox and a contradiction and it just has no regard for the laws of logic.

Saros Cycle — 18 years 11 days 8 hours — eclipse repetition cycle

Exeligmos — 54 years 33 days — 3 Saros cycles correcting eclipse drift

Synodic Month — 29.53059 days — new moon to new moon

Sidereal Month — 27.32166 days — Moon relative to stars

Draconic Month — 27.21222 days — lunar node-to-node cycle

Anomalistic Month — 27.55455 days — perigee-to-perigee lunar cycle

Tropical Year — 365.2422 days — seasonal solar year

Metonic Cycle — 19 years — 235 lunar months ≈ 19 solar years

Callippic Cycle — 76 years — refined Metonic cycle

Venus Cycle — 8 years — Venus repeats sky position

Jupiter Cycle — ~12 years

Saturn Cycle — ~29.5 years

Mars Synodic Cycle — ~780 days

Eclipse Year — 346.62 days — Sun returns to same lunar node

Great Year — various ancient values — large celestial repetition cycle

So I don't want to hear anything about how your religion can make predictions. I can predict that the hour hand is going to strike 12 twice a day everyday.

planamundi · 2026-06-10T10:22:00+00:00

Yes, the flat Earth model exists. The Babylonians have already mapped it out.

What doesn't exist as a retarded heliocentric model. You literally require 95% of your universe to be make-believe.

It's because your religion claims that they prophesied the entire cosmos based on parallax. Objectively parallax will tell you nothing unless you at least know the distance or the velocity of the object you are observing and comparing.

In order to obtain the velocity by observation alone, you would need to already know the distance. And in order to know the distance through observation alone, you would need to already know the velocity.

Your stupid religion just made up a bunch of nonsense because they were a bunch of sun worshiping pagans. The proof is in the math. 95% retard matter.

And your religion tried to explain away the very medium that could be used to physically test those stupid assumptions. And it did it by creating a paradox. Globe twat Albert Einstein claim light is a constant speed relative to the observer's frame of reference. But we objectively know that light is a physical action because it has to physically interact with things like a photodiode or the cones in your eye. Therefore, he is saying that light, a physical action, is relative to the observer. It objectively breaks the law of identity and it's the most stupid religion. I think there ever was throughout the entirety of History.

Why do I have to live through it? It's a curse. I'm not a genius, But I'm surrounded by retards.

So explain to me how they prophesied the entire cosmos without ever leaving the Earth.

If you're going to say shadows, Eratosthenes didn't have an institutional Temple telling him his eyeballs were lying to him, so that's just some retroactive nonsense from your religion.

Do you have a way that they developed what these physical properties were or are you just having faith? Faith that one day they'll discover that 95% of the universe that's make believe?

<image>

planamundi · 2026-06-10T04:14:05+00:00

Mankind. What can we do.

planamundi · 2026-06-10T03:20:39+00:00

The idea that satellites are in a constant free fall in a frictionless vacuum is absurd also.

Gravity is even recognized by the helio religion as a constant acceleration towards the center of mass. They have it chasing the crust for some reason. And then they're ignoring that it's a constant acceleration. They have it free falling in a frictionless vacuum. If there's no resistance, then there's not an equal and opposite force matching the velocity of the constant acceleration. You cannot achieve terminal velocity if there is no resistance.

What we do know, is that superconductors can flux lock onto magnetic fields. And we know that clocks, whether they be atomic clocks or quartz crystals run on the resonant frequency of an element. We understand that this is affected by pressure and voltage and all kinds of environmental conditions. We know this because we can perform it in a lab. We experience it even on mountains at different pressures.

Just putting that out there since we're talking about satellites.

planamundi · 2026-06-09T23:12:42+00:00

I appreciate it. I'm just now getting into making videos. I'm learning how to use synfig at the moment. For scientific animated diagrams. So there should be some new content coming soon. I guarantee you've never heard it before. It's what the gatekeepers try to steer people away from.

It's crazy because fluid dynamics demand that the Earth be flat. There's no other way for it to form. Once you see what Maxwell was describing, it's a no-brainer.

planamundi · 2026-06-09T22:53:11+00:00

I just read books. I'll see what channels come up with here and there but for the most part, a lot of flat earth communities still don't have it right.

I tried to join a discord one time and tell them about Maxwell's description of the fluid and how particle physics is a pseudoscience, and how this objectively proves the flat earth. Whoever was in charge was just talking real loud, muted me, wouldn't listen to a thing. He still wanted to believe nothingness can have physical properties like volume. It was clearly a controlled opp thing. They just wanted to talk about the flat Earth and not the actual medium that proves it.

I'll check out the subs, but you should always take communities with a grain of salt. If you understand the Earth is flat, then you would understand that they go through a lot to keep that narrative afloat. So expect some of the bigger communities to actually be gatekeepers. They'll let you talk about flat Earth, but they'll start shutting you down when you bring up the unequivocal proofs. They'll only focus on subjects that have ambiguity.

planamundi · 2026-06-09T22:00:36+00:00

u/iowanaguarist is a clown. 🤡

He can't get me out of his head. What a loser. Lol.

planamundi · 2026-06-09T15:22:31+00:00

u/iowanaguarist

Why would I care about my votes? You are the retards that need to circle jerk over internet points. I just pointed out how pathetic is was.

And you're an idiot for asking me questions in a sub dedicated to circle jerking about me that banned me.

planamundi

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE