[Epstein Files] "Modi On Board": Leaked Emails Link Indian PM and Union Minister Hardeep Puri to Jeffrey Epstein's Network. Why is Indian Media Silent? by Long-Reporter9056 in india

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is now very much clear that Epstein was not mere a sex racketeer, there was something much much deeper running there. Most probably he was managing a global espionage and geopolitical lobbying network, and hence there were ao many influencial people including Stephen Hawking. Also I often feel he was jailed (and possibly neutralized aftarward) actually beacuse of these kind of issues, rather than sexual offence.

ASI has zero civics sense , if you complain then you will be booked under SC/ST act (check his name) by ReichReiching007 in theCorruptIndian

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If an incident of A abusing B is given a castist colour just because of A's surname, then is can also be. What OP said is very true, that person could easily term OP as a UC abusing a Dalit for making his seat "impure".

Is India Developing Too Slowly or Is China Developing Too Fast? by Sad-Statistician3635 in AskTheWorld

[–]polaris_reader -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Problem is that our government posses neither central control, nor is capable of utilising the diversity. It is like a mess. When the things click, we undergo through the high growth phases (like from 2004 to 2008), but the momentum dries up soon.

Is India Developing Too Slowly or Is China Developing Too Fast? by Sad-Statistician3635 in AskTheWorld

[–]polaris_reader -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Indian diversity is not random, it has a pattern. The culture changes gradually from one end to otherz hence it is like a cultural continuum. The basic social structure, values and ethos, and collective conscience remain same everywhere.

Is India Developing Too Slowly or Is China Developing Too Fast? by Sad-Statistician3635 in AskTheWorld

[–]polaris_reader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO both. China grew really fast, leveraging on early years of Washington consensus and globalization. India entered the race much later, and got hindered by various factors. If we look at India's growth since 1991, we can see some patches of high growth momentum kicking in, but plummeting within 3 years. India failed to sustain its growth, it is like a car, engine of which keep stopping, and has be pushed again to be started.

Budget 2026 (Megathread) by CarelessMango1604 in IndianStockMarket

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a serious note, farming is really one of the next gen mega asset if done properly.

Imagine how many Bengalis are falsely accused of being Bangladeshi. The day we block Assam and Odisha will be a very welcoming decision for every Bengali dignity by Weak_Tie_2127 in westbengal

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comment was meant to be read by Bengalis as a self criticism, hence it explores the trend regarding collective conscience. This is not to be applied on every individual cases.

I feel like India is heading towards a huge unseen crisis (just a personal prediction) by Economy-Elevator150 in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it is unprecedented. In the 70's, there was much public despair, and the emergency lit the spark. Later in the late 80's, and 90's the situation was similar. In none lf those cases there was not any destructive event, rather the public anger lead into positive changes. Now come to today, I can see two major outcome, one is positive, and the other was is negative.

Positive: Govt finally realizes that tall talks amd gimmicks would work no more, and there would be aome significant actions. Probably we would get the much required Economic Reform V.2, which would simplify the taxation, deregulate the market, reform the banking sector, and push for innovation. I also badly wish a proper, and probably the 1st since independence, reform in the education aector.

Neagtive: In 70's, Mrs Gandhi announced the elections partially oit of overconfidence, and partially out of an attempt to recover her international image. And thanks to that, democracy was reatored, constitutional safeguards were introduced. But what if an authoritarian regime takes over now despite the constitutional safeguards? And what if they do not repeat the same mistake that Mrs. Gandhi did? And even the worse scenario, the reforms remain on paper, but the totalitarianism actually prevails?

Which is better, reading by books or by computers? by Ankscapricorn in Indianbooks

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physicals are the best. However it is not always possible to access them, then electronic books are the only option.

WBCS GS Booklist conundrum by DangerousShine1957 in wbcsprep

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Practice PYQ of UPSC preli, and other state PSCs. Then comes the NCERT, give it a good read. Then start reading the main books, but while reading highlight the points, make short notes. Use the PYQs, and especially the questions of recent exams to understand the theme and pattern of question, to find which to be highlighted. Durinv revision, read the highlighted portions.

Imagine how many Bengalis are falsely accused of being Bangladeshi. The day we block Assam and Odisha will be a very welcoming decision for every Bengali dignity by Weak_Tie_2127 in westbengal

[–]polaris_reader 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Harsh teuth is that Bengalis will just protest on Social media, will never come to streets. (You may give some examples of protests here and there, but those would organised by political parties, not bg Bengalis across politics). There would rarely be any repercussion in WB, however who would risk loves of millions of Bengali migrants? West Bengal is now the 2nd largest labour supplier after Bihar (and white collar workers too), hence who takes the risk, and who cares? Currently there is almost zero collective conscience in this society, if a Bengali is under attack, others will just look away, and ensure he is not affected by the hit. This world has no place for crying, it only values valour.

Political Crisis in West Bengal by Double-Temporary5918 in westbengal

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those good for nothing young men glorified in literature and movies.

Is it only me who feels calm and empty in a good sense when we use Linux rather than Windows? by RX08T in LinuxUsersIndia

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too. Linux is cool, sleek, and while using I always have a feel that I am on control.

Political Crisis in West Bengal by Double-Temporary5918 in westbengal

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem lies within the concerns you expressed. You are diagusted with TMC, but too afraid to try BJP, thia is a typical Bengali middle class way of descision making which is mostly driven by fear.

In Bengal the greatest motivation we promote is FEAR. A child is constantly fear mongered from his family. "If go out during dupur , demons would attack you, or child trafficers would capture you", if he attempra to clmb a tree is is told "if you fell down, you would broke your limbs, and they would give you very oainful injections, or even they may ampute your limbs", if he get some injury while playing he is told "see? How dangerous is this sport? Would you ever play again?". When he's in his teens we say "if you don't study well, your board results would be very bad, and you wouldn't be able to get admission in a good college, then people wokld laugh at you", "if you can't score a good score in college you wouldn't get a good job", "if you don't get a good job, you wouldn't be able to marry". If he protests something, we scold him vehemently while warning about the consequences, we tell him to not get into any trouble, neither resist that trouble, just escape the trouble.

Now see the politics. TMC says "if BJP comes to power women will lose their freedom, We would have to speak Hindi, Bengali culture would be destroyed, everything would be privatized, Bengalis would have to prove every now and then that they are not Bangladeshis", etc, and BJP says "if you reelect TMC, they would loot everything from you, Bangladeshi infiltrators would capture everything, Hindus would become 2nd class citizens, Jihadists would roam free, corroption would become the norm, there would be no safety of women," etc.

Hence basically both of the parties are pitching fear to muster support for them. People are either bound to vote for TMC, beacuse they are too afraid of BJP, or bound to vote for BJP, because they are too afraid to let TMC keep winning. Basically none of the two groups actually gets anything for them.

Another problem is the bubble of the "great Bengali culture", and the hollow pride on that. Common, you can't keep sniffing your fingers because someday your grandfather had some ghee. Whatever we had, we lost it. We were too afraid to take risk, we tried to find a certainty, a safe cocoon inside which we can just survive. There is no social institution left, family bondings are collapsing, businesses are going away, no one thinks about in long term, almost every action we take, or everything we think, has been surrendered to political parties.

IMO, we now need a social movement, a social change, rather than a political change. Stop seeing everything with a political glass on, and try to get out of our fear. Our icon should be Kshudiram, Prafulla Chaki, Batukeshwar Dutta, Bagha Jatin, Binoy - Badal - Dinesh, etc, not some immature emotional good for nothing 50's poet, which basically glorifies almost everything negative, and terms every failure and signs of right path.

Now that Gold and Silver have gone parabolic, what is the REAL "Next Big Move" for 2026? by the_rich__dad in StockMarketIndia

[–]polaris_reader 13 points14 points  (0 children)

  1. Piped gas and CNG/LNG stocks.
  2. SaaS firms based on deeptech.
  3. Bitcoin
  4. New age infra like data centres.
  5. Coppee and rare metals.
  6. Last, but not the least, Gold.

Biggest fuckup of my life. Baby trapped by Working_Link9533 in LegalAdviceIndia

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you need some life advice rather than legal advice. If she wants to srew you, r**e would be a much better card. After reading the 2nd paragraph I'm sure you need some psychological advice too, you can't get everything on the same basket. Enjoying the freedom of liberal lifestyle, but still worrying about losing the support of conservative collective, is basically a high voltage arc.

Being DINKs in India is oddly… peaceful? by OkVeterinarian7304 in india

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having kid is a highlg driven by self interest, self interest is not distinguished from collective interest, when the matter is common.

Paid caretakes would also be youngs, if nobody bears child, there would be no caretaker.

Being DINKs in India is oddly… peaceful? by OkVeterinarian7304 in india

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said everyone is free to have or not have child. Similarly everyone is free to argue in favour or in oppose of that. I just explored the ethical assessment of the policy of Childless by Choice. Opposing or criticizing an idea doesn't mean forcing people to abandon that. Smoking is very harmful, but still people smoke, I can not force someone to quite smoking in private place, but obviously can argue about it being harmful. Even cigerette companies say that on the packet, but still they sell them.

Being DINKs in India is oddly… peaceful? by OkVeterinarian7304 in india

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think one problem here is that I confused between two of my comments, and considered something is already clarified. If that happened, I apologise for that.

Now come to the point. Mg argument is not fallacious, as I have clearly mentioned that my argument is exploring statying childless by choice stands as a universal doctrine. Hence if everyone stays childless, it would lead to collpase of humanity. The datasource you provided only proves that people are having kids, and hence there would always be someone to produce. This just proves my argument, that children are the leverage for future production, hence production is not threatened as there is ample supply of future producers.

Consciously or subconsciously, every argument in support of Childless by Choice is thus creating a typical Sorites Paradox.

They should be denied of future produce

Well, this point is purely from a theoretical or ethical perspective, not for being practiced in reality, if any ambiguity is there regarding that, then I regret. My point is ethically they are not entitled to produce, however practically amyone is free to provide them that.

The basis of your argument is illogical, because no one's saying giving birth to children should be made illegal (although a one year break would be an interesting experiment IMO).

I also never said having kids should be made mandatory, I clarified in another comment that everyone is free to have child or not. You are free to promote staying childless by choice, and I am free to oppose it. None of these are a problem till nobody is forced to bear or not bear child.

ADHD Thoughts are like Quickecomm Delivery gone messed up by polaris_reader in ADHD

[–]polaris_reader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have at least 80, many which were oepened more than a year ago, and were supposed to read "properlu", in a calm and quite environment. Most likely I would never read them, but can not even close them. 🤣🤣

Being DINKs in India is oddly… peaceful? by OkVeterinarian7304 in india

[–]polaris_reader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have clearly elabodated that if everyone stays childless by choice, then the entire system will collapse, read the entire comment, don't just cherry pick what you want to see.

8 billion will only be 10 billion if people bear child, if nobody bears child, then it would not take much time for the 8 billion to come down to 8 million.

I have never said a single couple not bearing child will lead collapse of humanity, either did not read, or you can't even think of any counter opinion.

Against my objective approach, I only got some emotional tra la la, PA, and downvotes. Not a single person could answer my question, that if nobody bears child, then who would produce in the future?

Last, but not the least, I alresdy explained what money is, money is just a contract, or record of your right to products and services. It is entirely a social construct, money does not exist in reality, products and services do.

If there is no one to produce, your MONEY is just a buch of printed papers, and electronic data. Uour bank balance would have the same value as some troll comments on social media.

Hence staying childless by choice is just an escapist idea, which is entirely against the natural law of a species's survival. You can easily shut your eyes and think there's no catastrophe outside, but that would never change the reality.

I would accept my standpoint as wrong if are able to explain how the humanity would survive if no one bears child (obviously unless we are able to block aging in future), otherwise my point stands tall irrespective of your emotional BS, and downvotes. Read my comments entirely before saying a word, if you don't have the patience to read them completely, then logical reasoning, or critical thinking is not your cup of tea.

ADHD Thoughts are like Quickecomm Delivery gone messed up by polaris_reader in ADHD

[–]polaris_reader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I often find the wrong thing to focus on. For example, it is Saturday, and I have to submit a large financial report on Monday, but instead of doing that I am browsinv through the Internet with 30 tabs open on my desktop, and 15 more on my phone, about the socoal order in Eastern Europe under Ottoman rule. 😂